The Lunar New Year cross-strait charter flights got off the ground on Jan. 29. The headline in the Taiwan Daily said "Regular cross-strait flights around the corner," while the China Times used nine pages to cover every aspect of the event. Airports on both sides of the Taiwan Strait arranged a series of events, and the red Chinese flag was raised at Taoyuan International Airport, as if Taiwan was going through yet another "retrocession."
"This is a historic moment," said an excited Billy Chang (張國政), director-general of the Civil Aeronautics Administration.
The younger generations didn't experience a similar historic moment 60 years ago, when 6 million people were welcoming new arrivals. Then it was the 62nd Army, and now it is Taiwanese doing business in China. The 62nd Army brought the 228 Incident and 38 years of martial law. I wonder what the businesspeople will bring?
It is true that history keeps repeating itself, maybe because of an innate human inability to learn from it. In 1987, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government followed up on a Democratic Progressive Party initiative and lifted the ban on people from Taiwan visiting relatives in China. The government stressed that the lifting of the ban was restricted only to visiting relatives, and that using that as a pretext for any other activity would be met with severe punishment.
But many things that were not allowed in Taiwan were permitted abroad, and so opening a small door was in fact tantamount to opening the floodgates: Visiting relatives soon developed into tourism, and tourism developed into investment -- China fever is a fact.
Similarly, although the Mainland Affairs Council said that the charter flights would only be open to Taiwanese businesspeople, even Filipino housemaids were able to board. Council officials can't be so stupid that they did not anticipate this result. The reasoning of travellers was, "If it is OK for Taiwanese businesspeople, then why wouldn't it also be OK for overseas students; if it is OK for overseas students, then why wouldn't it be OK for Filipino housemaids?"
Following this line of reasoning, if Lunar New Year's charter flights are OK, then why wouldn't flights on other holidays be OK? If flights on holidays are OK, then why not flights on normal days? Like Chang said: "Regular cross-strait flights are just around the corner."
There were reports that when the China Southern flight landed in Taoyuan at 9:27am on Jan. 29, applause and shouts of welcome broke out in the waiting room, where everyone present celebrated these ice-breaking flights.
But we should not let anyone forget that when the 2,160m-long bridge on Penghu Island was opened 37 years ago (connecting Hsiyu with the two other main islands of Penghu, cutting travel time from Hsiyu to Makung to half an hour), both the government and public celebrated, saying that the project would open the door for the development of Hsiyu.
Today the island is as desolate as ever, and the population has been reduced by half.
In August 1979, the opening of Makung airport was met with anticipation by residents and businesspeople alike. The champagne flowed and it was said to be a historic moment for Penghu. From that moment on, Penghu residents could fly directly to Taipei and Tainan, and everyone thought that Penghu's becoming the Pearl of the Taiwan Strait was just around the corner.
Penghu, however, has met with the same fate as Hsiyu. No matter how hard Penghu County commissioners have worked to attract businesses, Penghu's money and talent have kept flowing toward Taiwan.
Twenty-six years have gone by, and although the population of Taiwan has almost doubled, Penghu's population has dwindled, falling from 110,000 to a bit over 90,000. International examples of bigger economic entities absorbing smaller economic entities are too numerous to mention.
I sincerely hope that this part of history will not be repeated in Taiwan. But if we listen to our economic officials and the theories of unificationist scholars, then "market forces are unstoppable." Taiwan will follow in the wake of Penghu, and a repeat of history will be unavoidable.
No matter what, it is too late to change. Only history will tell what significance the historic moment on Jan. 29 held for the future development of Taiwan. We will know in 10 or 20 years' time.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS