With the ruling Thai Rak Thai party expecting a clean triumph at the polls on Sunday, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra has little to worry about on the home front.
His main challenges over the next four years are more likely to come from abroad, analysts say.
"I think Thaksin's got the domestic situation all wrapped up, so he'll have to look to the international arena if he wants to make a mark in his second term," said Kobsak Chutikul, a former Foreign Ministry spokesman-turned-politician.
It is widely expected that the Thai Rak Thai will win more than 300 of the 500 contested seats in Sunday's general election, giving Thaksin and his party a clear mandate to pursue their own domestic policies.
Pursuing Thaksin's often ambitious goals abroad may prove more problematic. There are signs that his autocratic, authoritarian style has already irked some of Thailand's neighbors.
For instance, Thaksin's push to turn Thailand into a regional center for a regional tsunami early warning system in the aftermath of the Dec. 26 disaster was shot down at an international conference last weekend.
Among the chief objectors to Thailand's bid to take center stage was Indonesia.
A peeved Thaksin announced on Monday that Thailand would go ahead with setting up its own early warning system with or without regional cooperation.
"Some countries are concerned too much about themselves and are less concerned about the region," he said.
Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, has made clear its foreign policy goal of regaining more of a leadership role in the ASEAN, which it has lost since the fall of Suharto, another autocratic Asian leader.
ASEAN has a long history of autocratic leaders who transformed their countries from chaotic backwaters into successful modern economies, as Lee Kuan-yew (李光耀) did for Singapore and Mahathir Mohamad did for Malaysia.
Suharto, Lee and Mahathir, all powerful personalities, also emerged as leaders within ASEAN, a role Thaksin clearly aspires to as well.
"He doesn't want to be a leader of a developing country," said one Western diplomat. "He considers himself leading an up-and-coming industrialized country, and considers Thailand to be a leader in the region."
Thailand may be a leader economically -- certainly it has recovered quicker from the 1997 Asian financial crisis than Indonesia -- but it will take more than economic and business clout to lead ASEAN politically, observers note.
Thaksin annoyed neighboring Malaysia with his accusations last year that it was sheltering Muslim separatists responsible for the rising tensions in Thailand's three southernmost, predominantly Muslim, provinces where more than 600 people died in violent clashes last year.
With the southern problem far from settled, Thaksin can look forward to tense relations with predominantly Muslim Malaysia and Indonesia in the near future.
And Thailand's fairly close relationship with Myanmar, cultivated by Thaksin, could turn into a major ASEAN embarrassment if the country's military leadership does not free opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest by next year, when Myanmar will chair the regional grouping.
Another tough challenge for Thaksin will be his campaign to make Foreign Minister Surakiart Sathirathai a candidate to replace UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, who is scheduled to retire in 2007. Surakiart's chances to be named UN chief are deemed slim.
"The UN secretary general has to have an image of being his own man, because his first loyalty has to be to the United Nations," said one Asian diplomat.
Surakiart's first loyalty has always been to Thaksin.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on