The people of Taiwan have every right to be outraged by the case of the four-year-old abuse victim recently declared brain-dead at a Taichung hospital. Moreover, the demands for greater regulation and oversight of the medical system in Taiwan are in line with the severity of the case. However, in reality this case is not simply a matter of medical malfeasance. The attitudes of the doctors at Taipei Municipal Jen Ai Hospital, the operators at the Emergency Operations Center and the Taipei hospital personnel that refused to take the case reflect an aspect of Taiwanese society that needs to be addressed.
Having lived in Taiwan for close to three years I have noticed that service, accountability and responsibility are weak concepts here. More dominant is the desire to do what is easiest and best for oneself at the expense of others. We do not have to look to extreme cases to see that in Taiwan, "what can I get away with" seems to be the national creed. Three basic examples from daily life can demonstrate this point.
For most people in Taiwan cable television is the norm. However, I have been watching the same movies for nearly three years. Movie channels such as HBO, Cinemax and Star Movies swap movies so that programming is redundant. To make matters worse, all of the channels that offer English-language programming replay movies and episodes of programs at lease twice, sometimes four times, in a 24-hour period. Essentially, consumers have no choice, no exit option and no avenue of complaint. Add to that the steadily decreasing broadcast quality and it is clear that cable providers have no real sense of service, responsibility or accountability to the consumer.
Driving habits offer another example. The driving situation here is not a matter of poor driving skills, but horrendous driving habits. The driving culture illustrates a near total lack of respect for the rules of the road as indicated in the number of vehicles that run red lights at high speeds.
Walk into any high school or university classroom and one can see this social dynamic played out in one of its most devastating venues. Teachers stand at the front of the room and talk, as if they are alone, rarely looking at the students. Students, if they go to class, often chat, sleep or read.
The teachers take little or no responsibility for classroom management, assuming that just showing up and giving the lecture fulfills the responsibility. Students take little or no responsibility for mastering the material, choosing rather to cram for a minimal passing grade at exam time.
The actions of both students and teachers exhibit a mutual lack of respect. These actions also exhibit a lack of respect for education and a lack of personal responsibility -- students and teachers both doing the minimum that they can get away with to justify their position. There may be exceptions, but I defy anyone to prove me wrong on this point.
Should doctors Lin Chin-nan (林致男) and Liu Chih-hwa (劉奇樺) be punished for their negligence? Should Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) be taken to task for municipal and administrative failures? Should Taipei hospitals and the national Emergency Operations Center be held accountable? Should the public now demand a review and overhaul of the medical system? Of course the answer to all of these questions is a resounding yes.
At the same time, anyone living in Taiwan knows that the same dynamic of irresponsibility, unaccountability and duplicity exhibited in the case of "Little Sister Chiu" manifests itself millions of times each day throughout Taiwan in myriad venues. Such behavior seems to be a basic part of Taiwanese society and culture. As such, we are all responsible for what happened to "Little Sister Chiu."
The parents that allow their children to believe that running a red light is okay as long as you do not get caught are responsible. The neighbor that refuses to report child abuse because the abused child is not a member of their family is responsible.
Every policeman that waits at a corner to give out tickets for right turns on red to fulfill his monthly ticket quota, rather than taking the time to chase down and ticket the motorist that runs a red light, is responsible.
Every politician that plays party politics at the expense of the interests of the people of Taiwan is responsible. Every bureaucrat that chooses to do things the same old way because it is easy is responsible.
Every teacher or professor, foreigners included, that does not make the education of their students a priority is responsible.
The manufacturer that puts old TV parts in new TV cases and the factory owner that lies about toxic pollutants are responsible. Anyone that uses Chinese or Taiwanese "culture" as an excuse for this social condition is responsible.
I do not introduce these points to trivialize the events that lead to the death of "Little Sister Chiu." Nor do I make these points as a result of culture shock or to berate the people of Taiwan. I know that any nation is very sensitive to criticism from a non-native, and I do respect and appreciate that.
However, the sad fact is that if Taiwan as a nation, a people, a society and a culture does not honestly look into this socio-cultural dynamic then we have not seen the last "Little Sister Chiu."
George Thompson is an assistant professor in the department of applied foreign language at National Penghu Institute of Technology.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS