The onslaught of the winter Typhoon Nanmadol made everyone forget the intense legislative election campaign, as early warning and disaster prevention mechanisms were initiated in the hope of minimizing damage.
Although everyone agrees that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure," an oft forgotten principle is that making preparations even before the threat of a disaster has appeared is more important than strengthening preparations when a disaster is already approaching.
Winter typhoons are extremely rare. Are they the result of climate changes, or are they natural disturbances in weather patterns? The scientific community is still unable to determine this. If recent phenomena are a part of these changes, we may be too late if we wait for scientists to propose a concrete solution before we act.
The Kyoto Protocol, aimed at restricting industrialized nations' greenhouse gas emissions, will take effect on Feb. 16 -- 90 days after the UN received Russian President Vladimir Putin's signature on the agreement. The convention on climate change affects societies, environments, economies and even national defense and diplomatic relations. Despite the effects this important convention will have on Taiwan's future development, the government has treated it as a low priority.
After the Kyoto Protocol takes effect, international reductions and measures will be implemented. As Taiwan faces this "storm," the government should not simply choose to let things take their natural course.
Although scientists are still unable to clearly forecast the temporal and geographic extent of climate change, a majority agrees that if greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, the climate will change, and it may become completely different from the current climate. Because we have no way of predicting the future, conservative hopes must not deviate too far from the current situation.
Scientists estimate that global greenhouse gas emissions should be reduced by 60 percent or more to keep concentration levels below 25 percent. The current stage of the Kyoto Protocol only requires an average reduction of 5.2 percent by 2010.
The main argument of those opposing immediate reductions is a lack of scientific evidence. But what they are really worried about is the costs of such reductions. If we consider the situation using a time-frame of 100 years, however, the benefits to future generations, ecology and socio-economic activities in reducing or eliminating greenhouse gas emissions are certain to outweigh the costs, and that is why such reductions should, and must, be carried out.
Doing this at an early stage will reduce the burden on future generations to carry out reductions, and that is why environmental activists unanimously demand immediate action.
Some members of government and industrial leaders, however, have differing opinions when it comes to the questions of how much, when and how reductions should be implemented, as well as how long it will be before costs are returned, and whether implementation of reductions will affect competitiveness, thus handing advantages to adversaries.
As a result of worries over future uncertainties and the possibility that the advantages of reductions will not appear immediately, little has actually been done.
Although there still is no conclusive scientific evidence that climate change will initiate an increase in adverse weather, 30 years of international insurance industry data show that losses caused by natural disasters have increased by between five and 10 times over the past 12 years. Even if we ignore the greenhouse effect, the government should be strict in its implementation of measures to minimize losses from natural disasters, just as it takes preventative action when a typhoon is nearing.
Some examples of this would be to prohibit development and cultivation in disaster-prone areas, encourage indigenous peoples to move to safe areas, strengthen education in disaster prevention and how to avoid exposing oneself to danger, carrying out an overall review of existing land programs, and to use legal and policy incentives to encourage the public to participate in soil, water and resource conservation measures.
The soon-to-take-effect Kyoto Protocol makes a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions even more unavoidable. Although Taiwan is not a signatory of the protocol, it cannot remain aloof. Nor can it rely on taking advantage of the actions of other countries.
The countries and industries of Europe and North America have on many occasions used international environmental treaties to set up trade barriers or prohibit environmentally unsafe products. These types of measures could seriously hurt an export-oriented economies like Taiwan.
Furthermore, when the Kyoto Protocol was written, most people were aware that reduction targets fell well short of what scientists were suggesting.
The hope, however, was that lower targets would attract the participation of more countries. The hope was also to use official measures to reduce questions regarding execution. In future, reduction targets will be expanded and the number of participating countries will increase. When most countries participate in reductions, the drawbacks for individual countries will decrease, and there will be even fewer opportunities for a free lunch.
Ninety-seven percent of Taiwan's energy is imported. Energy savings measures would not only decrease the use of foreign currency and a reliance on energy imports, it would also relieve the impact of fluctuations in international energy prices.
If many public institutions were to make small adjustments to their operations, many obvious results would follow, such as creating unambiguous and easily understood energy labels to allow consumers a choice, improving mass transportation and reducing energy needs and prioritizing the purchase of energy-saving products to point the way for manufacturing industries.
In addition, reusable energies such as wind power, solar power and landfill gas could create a more diverse energy system, offer more room for individual choice, and strengthen overall security of the energy system. Benefits would of course not be limited to the commercial sector.
Crisis can be an opportunity. International environmental agreements are becoming increasingly strict, and the need for fossil fuels is growing rapidly. This has already forced global energy prices to increase and made energy-saving methods and new energies more competitive.
The government should not only find ways of reducing losses from natural disasters, it should also promote energy-saving measures and develop reusable energy. It should also provide ample information to make the public understand the problems attached to a continued use of fossil fuels and allow industry enough time to prepare or even set up new industries.
Only by properly preparing itself can Taiwan be confident in handling the ever-changing international situation. The relationship between environmental protection and economic development has changed from one of opposition to one of mutual influence and growth. This understanding is a crucial link as Taiwan develops into an advanced country.
Gloria Hsu is a professor of atmospheric sciences at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS