The result of the legislative elections are out, and as such, the biggest question on everyone's mind has been answered: the pan-blue camp will continue to hold a slight majority in the legislature, having won 114 seats out of 225.
That is hardly good news for those who are fed up with the continued gridlock in the Legislative Yuan over the past four years, where many important bills were blocked as a result of political rivalries.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) remains the biggest political party in the legislature, holding 89 seats. At 38 percent, the percentage of votes earned by DPP grew in number from the last legislative election, earning the party two additional seats. However, this growth falls far short of the pan-green camp's ambition of seizing a majority in the legislature.
This suggests that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who received 50.1 percent of the vote in March presidential election, was unable to use his relative popularity to raise support for pan-green candidates in yesterday's elections. The fact that 59 percent of voters participated in the legislative elections -- compared to 80.2 percent turnout for the presidential election -- probably played a significant role in this outcome.
Presumably, those who decided to stay home are predominantly moderate or undecided voters. In other words, people who do not have consistent party affiliation chose not to go to the polls. In a country as divided as Taiwan, this makes perfect sense. The March 20 presidential election left the nation bitterly divided, and the controversies surrounding that election have continued to plague the country to this day. As a result, many people have become sick and tired of politics, and many wanted nothing to do with the legislative elections.
The campaign strategies used by all political parties across the political spectrum contributed to the wave of voter apathy. There were very few debates on substantive policies and issues, and party platforms did little to lure moderate voters. Instead, how voters should allocate votes, and which candidates should be "dumped" and which be "saved" became the focus of campaigning. These strategies were only successful in motivating steadfast party supporters to go out and vote. The results show that moderate voters were largely alienated and that parties did not do enough to seek support from outside their traditional voter bases.
A closer look at the outcome also shows that many incumbents who were seemingly popular in pre-election surveys were actually defeated by small margins at the polls. Cases in point include the Taiwan Solidarity Union's (TSU) Chen Chien-ming
The election result had much to do with the way the pan-green camp became too ambitious by nominating too many candidates in the same districts. It also had much to do with vote-allocation strategies. As a result of such strategies, many voters decided not to vote for candidates favored to win, and instead voted for those forecast to be underdogs. Interestingly, many "underdog" candidates got elected as a result.
Under the circumstances, it is comforting to know that this will be the last legislative election in which the "single-vote, multiple-member" system will be used, and that the problematic "save and dump" vote-allocation strategy it gives rise to will come to an end.
Finally, the number of legislative seats held by the pan-blue camp has not changed much as a result of this election. This indicates that voters prefer stability over unpredictability. Hopefully, the political camps and their successfully-elected candidates will keep this in mind in the coming years.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS