The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) announced on Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Premier Yu Shyi-kun for libel and defamation. The suit was filed after Yu repeatedly claimed during legislative question-and-answer sessions that the KMT's assets are stolen "booty," and that whoever purchases the party's assets is buying stolen property.
According to the KMT's complaint, "The KMT assets are a legacy of history and the accumulation of years of effort. They have by no means been obtained by illegal means." Obviously, the thief still does not know what he did wrong. The KMT's wealth does in fact derive from theft. The concept of "the rule of law" did not exist during Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek's (
However, the KMT is not aware that times and the political system have changed. Under the rule of law, we must review the inappropriate damage to lives and properties in the past -- such as mishandled judicial cases, including those related to the 228 Incident, and the assets robbed by the KMT.
By turning its back on authoritarianism, the KMT might have openly embraced the rule of law with the arrival of democracy, carrying out party reforms to transform itself into a real democratic party. Unfortunately, it has not changed its authoritarian attitude. Not only is it holding on to its assets, but it has also resisted various reforms, as if the party is the driving force of Taiwan's "counter-revolution."
It is no wonder that, come election time, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) takes aim at the KMT's assets -- this is campaign ammunition that is ready at hand. In past elections, the KMT has adopted the tactic of shameless denial. To every accusation, the KMT would respond with all sorts of unreasonable nonsense. And so, with each election, the KMT loses a few more votes.
The period after each election is an excellent time for the KMT to engage in self-examination about making thorough internal reforms, but because of succession struggles and the unwillingness of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Over the years, the KMT's assets and bribery have been the two pillars of its electoral machine. It is the party's assets that allow it to buy votes. After many years of engagement with the KMT, the DPP is very aware of the KMT's tricks, and in every election Justice Minister Chen Ding-nan (
Which member of the KMT's localization faction has not joined that party with an eye to its massive resources? It's no wonder that the KMT is holding on to its assets for dear life, for without them, the party would disintegrate. The KMT's current suit against the premier is simply an expression of the dialogue between an authoritarian system and a democratic one. As there is no common ground, there is no choice but to take the matter to court. As for the people, their judgement will be expressed in the le-gislative elections next month.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS