Today, the country celebrates Double Ten National Day, the birthday of the Republic of China (ROC). One cannot help but sense the irony in holding such a celebration, since more and more people are beginning to see for themselves what the "ROC" really is to Taiwan. Former President Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) speech on Friday evening during a videoconference with US officials and academics in Washington, D.C. reflects the views of those here who have come to realize that the "ROC" -- far from being a blessing to Taiwan -- has become an obstacle.
Taiwan was not even part of the ROC when it first came into being almost 93 years ago. At the time, Taiwan was under Japanese rule. Moreover, the ROC was then the representative government of China. The association between China and Taiwan is at most historical and cultural, since the two have not been under the rule of the same government since Taiwan was ceded to Japan. In fact, for all practical purposes China was and continues to be an enemy state after the ROC lost power and the People's Republic of China took control of China. So it is a stretch to say that "China" is what ties the ROC with Taiwan.
The truth of the matter is that pretending the ROC is still alive and kicking has done nothing but hurt Taiwan. As pointed out by former president Lee, the use of the ROC Constitution and "ROC" name is creating both serious internal and external problems for the nation.
That Constitution, which was adopted in 1912 when Taiwan was neither under ROC rule nor part of China, was not tailored to meet the needs of this country. Despite repeated attempts to amend it, the Constitution's flaws are beyond repair. It continues to create serious crises for Taiwan and keeps the Chen Shui-bian (
The absurdity of the situation is further highlighted by the fact that this ROC Constitution continues to declare that China and Mongolia -- two sovereign and independent countries -- are under its rule. Lee was right in pointing out that this encroaches on other countries' sovereignty, in violation of international law.
To make matters worse, Taiwan has been exiled from the international community as a result of the "ROC" name, Lee went on to say. With the exception of some 20 countries, the majority of the world's nations do not recognize the legitimacy of the "ROC" and therefore do not hold formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan. The country is banned from using the "ROC" name at most international events, even those that are non-political in nature such as the Olympics, for which Taiwan must use the name "Chinese Taipei."
It is high time for Taiwan to have a new constitution that fits its needs. Taiwan is also entitled to use a name that is truly representative of the country. Pretending that the ROC still exists and that Taiwan is part of it is holding the country back from continued growth as a democracy.
But in order to accomplish these goals, both people in Taiwan and members of the international community must first repudiate the "one China" ideology and policy. Lee's speech on Friday was merely the first step of a campaign to open the eyes of the international community to what the problems are. Sooner or latter, the world will have to accept that Lee's speech is representative of a new majority, and of the popular will in Taiwan.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations