Taiwan first lady Wu Shu-hen (
I believe the IPC's action is worthy of recognition from all who love Taiwan. The first lady and the entire Taiwan delegation are entitled to further support and encouragement from every Taiwanese.
Therefore, together with other progressive organizations, I have drafted an open letter to the IPC to commend it on its fair and just action, and to support the first lady -- who in spite of weak health continues to stand up for her people and country -- and all Taiwanese athletes.
This letter along with e-mail addresses are provided for public use, and I expect each Taiwanese send an e-mail to the IPC to support our delegation and speak out for the energetic Taiwan civil society. E-mails can be sent to the IPC at info@paralympic.org, or to the IPC's Executive Committee contact Leen Coudenys at leen.coudenys@paralympic.org.
Dear International Paralympic Committee President Craven,
I am writing this letter to commend the International Paralympic Committee for its courageous decision to respect first lady Wu as the head of the Taiwanese Delegation.
Both you and I have been expecting the positive inspiration that the Paralympic athletes' excellent performance will have on the global community of disabled people.
This will be demonstrated and appreciated through empowering outstanding disabled athletes to achieve sporting excellence in a fair and just competition.
The Paralympic spirit should above all be about fairness, which is often not given to people with disabilities. Today IPC's important decision to respect Taiwan's first lady as the head of the Taiwanese Delegation has demonstrated the true spirit of fairness and justice.
The vision of the IPC is "to enable Paralympic athletes to achieve sporting excellence, and inspire and excite the world."
The IPC creates the conditions for the empowerment of athletes with disabilities through self-determination. This vision is the reason why the IPC exists.
Today, your action demonstrates great moral strength and upholds this vision despite external intervention.
In this way you have helped protect the integrity and dignity of our athletes and their outstanding leader. For this, I highly commend you on your great moral courage and efforts.
I want to also express our appreciation and encouragement to the first lady and the entire Taiwanese team. Despite her weak health, first lady Wu has stood up for her people at a difficult time by committing herself to the enhancement of the human rights of the disabled, and the protection of national dignity.
I also appreciate our athletes' courage and confidence in supporting their leader and achieving sporting excellence in the coming games.
They have shown the best example possible for all disabled people around the world to stand up for a just cause and dignity.
Please convey my sincerest respect to the IPC, first lady Wu and the Taiwanese team.
Hsiu-min Wu
President of the Taiwan Northern Society, Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US