The vassals of Beijing -- UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and his timid administration -- are once again hiding behind Resolution 2758 instead of protecting the UN Charter for freedom and universal human rights. One might expect Beijing to use Resolution 2758, because communist dictators can never truly understand the rule of law. But one should have much higher expectations of the world's supposed watchdog of liberty and justice.
Instead, the UN has become the watchdog of political correctness, complacence, appeasement and timidity. One good word of chastisement from Annan might shut Beijing up. But Annan's continual pandering to Beijing has emboldened the communist tyrants to use every means to crush Taiwan's very existence. The complicity of the UN in this racism, oppression and imperialism is an indictment of its anachronistic existence. Either it acts the part of an organization designed to protect humanity against naked aggression -- such as that of Beijing against Taiwan, Tibet and the many hundreds of millions oppressed throughout China -- or it should fold its tent and go home.
A recent example of Beijing's heavy-handed and highly public oppression of Taiwan is its attempt to prevent public discussion on Taiwan's application for UN membership through an international group of reporters at the UN. What kind of truly independent and freedom-loving association would bar 23 million people from having a voice in order to argue why they should be allowed to have a voice? But Beijing has relentlessly used the UN as a mouthpiece for its repressive communist dictatorship policies, and Kofi Annan has become Beijing's favorite parrot.
International reporters sought to hold a video conference with President Chen Shui-bian (
As for Resolution 2758, it says nothing about Taiwan or the 23 million people of Taiwan. It merely states that the People's Republic of China represents China, and the "representatives of Chiang Kai-shek (
For Beijing to assert that Resolution 2758 prevents Chen from speaking to the UN is reprehensible enough. But for the UN Secretariat to state it demonstrates that it is merely the mouthpiece of communist China. How tragic.
One cannot be surprised by this turn of events. Instead of leading the world organization with strength and conviction for what is right, Annan has steadfastly done nothing, steering a neutral course to avoid conflict in every case.
How can the UN be proud of anything when black Africans are raped and murdered in Darfur every single day while the UN sits around and debates the definition of "genocide," millions of Tibetans are targeted by Beijing's policy of eugenics and 23 million people in Taiwan are excluded from the world under a legal interpretation of a UN resolution provided by dictators who hold absolute power in a country where there is no rule of law?
Edmund Burke said "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Kofi Annan is the paradigmatic example of this inherent truth. Under his leadership, the UN will never "be all that it can be." His tenure at the UN cannot end too soon.
Lee Long-hwa
United States
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS