Three years after the Sept. 11 terrorist assaults on New York and Washington, two seemingly contradictory currents run through the veins of America, currents that will affect the US' relations with every nation in Asia.
The first is a mingling of nationalism and patriotism, which are closely related but not the same thing. This stream is perhaps best illuminated by the widely repeated phrase "you are either with us or with the terrorists," sometimes expressed as "you are either with us or against us."
The second current is a torrent of divisiveness accompanied by a decline in civility. Senator John McCain underlined this discord, the worst since the turbulent Vietnam era, with an eloquent plea when he addressed the Republican convention: "We are Americans first, Americans last, Americans always."
These two currents were not generated by this year's presidential election campaign but that contest, which has turned into a nasty, mudslinging match, has accentuated them.
The currents will surely surge through the debates in Congress, which reconvened last week, and will be in session until a few weeks before the Nov. 2 election.
For Asians, it will be important to recognize in coming months, no matter who wins the US presidency, that these conflicting currents will influence decisions in US foreign and security policy -- and may well make those policies inconsistent.
The US has often been accused of "unilateralism," or acting alone. The record shows that rarely to have been the case. Rather, the US has been nationalistic, giving priority to its own national interests and less weight to those of other nations.
Moreover, Americans appear to have become largely immune to criticism from other nations. The first cousin of nationalism, patriotism, or love of country, can been seen in the polls in which Americans express pride in the US, in flags flying in front of homes, bumper stickers on cars, and a renewed fervor in singing the national anthem. That zeal has subsided a bit since the emotionally charged days following Sept. 11, but not by much.
Shortly after Sept. 11, the Pew Center for the People and the Press in Washington said its surveys showed the terrorist attacks had "once again elevated the importance of nationhood" among Americans. Samuel Huntington, the Harvard scholar who has written extensively about the American search for identity, took that a step further, finding that US nationalism is "devoted to the preservation and enhancement of those qualities that have defined America from its inception."
Another scholar, Minxin Pei, of the Carnegie Endowment in Washington, has asserted that American nationalism was defined "by a belief in the supremacy of US democratic ideals."
"Americans not only take enormous pride in their values," Pei wrote, "but also regard them as universally applicable."
He cited a poll showing that 79 percent of Americans agreed: "It's good that American ideas and customs are spreading around the world."
McCain was more pointed: "As we've been a good friend to other countries in moments of shared perils, so we have good reason to expect their solidarity with us in this struggle" against terror.
In contrast, the unity that clicked into place on Sept. 11 has disappeared into a valley of division. Americans are experiencing a rupture that has been aggravated by bitter accusations and an absence of the willingness to compromise that had long been a mark of US democracy. This split appears to be rooted in the Vietnam era when Americans in their 20s clashed over the morality of the war in Southeast Asia.
Today, the issues are different but the people are the same, now being in their 50s and running the country as political leaders, government officials, military officers, business executives, university professors and news editors.
The US seems to be divided into three clusters: a large, conservative, religious right wing; an equally large, liberal, secular left wing; and a smaller, bewildered, hapless gaggle of independents. The rightists and leftists differ sharply, among many other things, over abortion, homosexual marriage, gun control, the death penalty for crimes, how to fight the war on terror, and the size and role of government -- and none will brook a compromise.
Little wonder that Americans can't even agree on whether the country is headed in the right or wrong direction, splitting almost equally on that issue. It was this dissension that McCain addressed in his plea for unity: "We must, whatever our disagreements, stick together in this great challenge of our time."
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Hawaii.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by