Those who are concerned about the cross-strait issue should keep in mind that since Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Chairman Joseph Wu (
For example, the council plans to allow Chinese actors and actresses to take part in Taiwanese movies. Late last month it announced that it would allow five major Chinese media outlets -- including the state-controlled Xinhua News Agency (
Due to competition from popular Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean movies and TV dramas, the number of outlets for local artists has shrunk significantly in the past few years. In practical terms, this openness would seem then to have few direct benefits. But it is a case of insisting on openness as a matter of principle.
This newspaper praises the council's insistence on openness, which proves that the goodwill of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) administration towards China was not just lip service. The actions of Wu and Chiu -- who have followed Chen for years and won his trust -- are the expression of this goodwill.
However, now that Taiwan has shown its goodwill, how has China responded?
Wang Zaixi (王在希), the vice minister of China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO), said Thursday that Beijing was "seriously considering creating a unification law" to make Taiwan a special administrative region of China. This makes us think of Beijing's attempt to use Article 23 of the Basic Law (基本法) to tighten freedom of speech in Hong Kong -- a move which sparked a 500,000-person demonstration in that city.
Putting aside the retrograde nature of any unification law, China is providing the pan-green camp with ammunition for propaganda. China should remember that in this year's presidential election, Chen was elected for a second term, defeating the pan-blue forces, despite a lackluster performance by his administration over the previous four years. Credit for this victory should be given to an awakening Taiwan consciousness.
China's actions at this time only serve to consolidate Taiwan awareness and increase the chances that the pan-greens will be able to obtain a legislative majority at the end of the year. The pan-greens must therefore be taking silent delight in the boost that the unification law has given them.
We would like to warn China that since the victory in the primaries to represent the KMT in Hsinchu City by Ko Chun-hsiung (柯俊雄), the former actor who registered to participate in the 1996 Hong Kong provisional legislative elections, the spectrum of the pan-blue camp has shifted into the red zone. The pan-greens are already preparing their attack should Ko be officially nominated. For the pan-greens, Ko's known soft spot for China is like a gift from heaven.
The TAO's Wang should be given special thanks for contributing to the pan-green legislative election campaign because of his use of the unification law to stimulate Taiwanese consciousness. At this point, it will be hard for the pan-greens to resist making use of their "Love Taiwan" propaganda once again.
We call on leaders on both sides of the Strait to put aside ideology and work toward building trust and furthering exchanges between the people of China and Taiwan.
Since we share a common language and culture, once the political issues are solved, Taiwan will always be China's friend, never its enemy. If we put aside emotion and insist on rational dialogue, we can help re-establish friendship between the two sides of the Strait.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS