When Taiwan's representative office in Britain issued a new passport and documents authorizing real estate transfers to Yeh Hsiu-chen (葉秀貞), the wife of Andrew Wang (汪傳浦), who is wanted for his involvement in the Lafayette scandal, it caused a political storm.
The entire country is now wondering how such a mistake could occur, not once, but twice.
Pan-blue legislators have raised tough questions that suggested the scandal was not just a mistake, and the Taiwan Solidarity Union's (TSU) legislative caucus has reported the issue to the Control Yuan, asking it to investigate the officials handling the matter: Tien Hung-mao (田弘茂), Taiwan's representative to Britain, and former foreign minister Eugene Chien (簡又新). TSU Legislator Chen Chien-ming (陳建銘) has pointed out that liability for administrative negligence among foreign affairs staff should also be investigated, as well as whether collusion between officials and business leaders was involved. Chen also demanded that the government review the role of civil servants and whether illegal practices still exist.
At this time, there is no concrete proof of collusion between Wang and people inside or outside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. However, given the political integrity of those involved, the ramifications could be damaging.
For example, before becoming foreign minister, Chien had to resign from his post as transportation and communications minister in connection with corruption surrounding highway construction projects. However, coming from a respected Taoyuan family adept at manipulating private relationships with high-level leaders, Chien was still trusted and given important posts by two consecutive presidents, even after his resignation. He advanced quickly in rank, from Taiwan's representative to Britain to advisor to the National Security Council; then from Presidential Office deputy secretary-general to the foreign ministry. This was met with much surprise, but the strong reaction did not affect him thanks to his presidential ties.
During Chien's term as foreign minister, he fulfilled his duties faithfully and energetically. His development of diplomatic relationships and state visits is praiseworthy, and he succeeded in reforming the old bureaucracy of the ministry. However, when weighing his successes against his failures, the government and the public may disagree on whether his legacy is positive or negative. It is most certainly a great failure.
If the upcoming investigation reveals a conspiracy in aiding suspected criminals, we cannot help but wonder why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government continues to recruit officials with a history of corruption who worked in the old Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government. Is our government completely lacking talent? Or is it because these corrupt officials are needed to raise political donations?
President Chen Shui-bian (
It is time to reform and clean up the culture of corruption left over from the old KMT government. The DPP government should take this opportunity to get rid of politically appointed officials with a poor track record of integrity, lest they continue to embarrass the Chen administration.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS