Iraq's deadly complexities will bedevil US-led forces in the country they have so far failed to pacify, whatever interim government takes over after June 30.
General John Abizaid, head of US Central Command, said on Wednesday the post-handover period could become even more violent, perhaps requiring the deployment of more US troops.
Analysts said the new government, whose composition and powers are still uncertain, will struggle for legitimacy, even if it gleans the formal blessing of the United Nations.
Buffeted by Iraqi insurgency and shamed by the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal, Washington's aim to turn postwar Iraq into a pro-American democratic model for the region looks beyond reach. Militants will relentlessly challenge any bid to portray the June 30 transfer as a real end to US occupation.
"US troops will still be there, with a job to do, but must represent themselves as a background force, not an occupation force, and present the Iraqi police and civil defense corps as frontline forces" said British security analyst Simon Henderson.
"On a quiet day, this is a fiction that can just about work, but there have not been many quiet days recently and one fears there won't be many in future," he said.
Washington, which insists Iraq's fledgling armed forces stay under US command after the handover, might prefer its troops to remain "over the horizon", holding the ring and ensuring that no one seizes power or intimidates the government by force.
But this looks impracticable, given the unreliability of Iraqi forces whose loyalties were split by last month's US military crackdown on Sunni insurgents in Falluja and on Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr's militia in the south.
Abizaid told a Senate hearing the United States might have to increase the 130,000 troops it now has in Iraq. "I would predict ... that the situation will become more violent even after sovereignty because it will remain unclear what's going to happen between the interim government and elections," he said.
Calm returned to Falluja only after a deal that gave control of the city to a local militia led by former officers in Saddam Hussein's army. Clashes with Sadr's fighters in Najaf have alternated with efforts to negotiate a solution, even if that means enlisting his men into an ad hoc force for the holy city.
Iraq historian Charles Tripp said such compromises carried their own dangers in a land where other Shiite and Kurdish militias have been allowed to survive since former president Saddam Hussein's overthrow.
Militias given a security role were unlikely to act simply as a local police force, but would seek political power, carving out turf, extracting money and snuffing out rivals, he said.
"This structure of latent violence is very problematic for those at the centre. Do you root them out in the name of national unity, or try to co-opt them?" Tripp asked.
"It brings violence closer to the surface of politics and we haven't really seen Iraqi politics emerging yet. It has all been under US auspices," he said. "Trying to develop politics in the shadow of gunmen is quite a dangerous recipe."
The interim administration, to be selected by US envoy Lakhdar Brahimi in consultation with the US-led authorities and Iraqi leaders, is expected to organize elections in January for an assembly that will then pick a transitional government.
Abdel-Bari Atwan, editor of the London-based Al-Quds al-Arabi daily, said most Iraqis and Arabs would view any new government as a tool of American occupation as long as US troops were in Iraq, regardless of US involvement.
"I see no sign there will be a representative government, you can't send it in by parachute," he said. "I can't see how it will function, given the dreadful security situation."
Brahimi's original plan for a caretaker team of respected technocrats has run into stiff opposition from some of the politicians on Iraq's US-appointed Governing Council. If the old faces reappear in the interim government it could undermine chances for international and Iraqi support.
"I don't think such a government would have a shred of legitimacy," said Iraq expert Toby Dodge. "It won't have power because [US administrator Paul] Bremer has stitched things up beforehand and it won't have popular support. "This will lead to a further dip in hope, a jump in cynicism and more alienation from the political process."
Tripp said militants, who killed the head of the Governing Council in a suicide bombing this week, would instigate more violence after June 30.
They would attack soft targets such as foreign contractors or Iraqis working with Americans to draw in US forces and expose the interim government's dependence on US protection.
With so much going wrong in Iraq, but with so much at stake, the Bush administration has three options, Dodge said.
"They can cut and run, but they can't do that before the presidential elections in November; they can adopt a radical change in policy -- Brahimi's plan to cut loose the old guys and move to a sustainable transition; or they can muddle through.
"Muddling through probably looks to them like the most seductive option, but it won't work," Dodge said.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
With the addition this year of Sweden and last year Finland to NATO, the Baltic Sea has been dubbed a “NATO lake” by some analysts. A glance at a map shows that is largely (but not completely) true — the coastline has a couple of slivers of Russian territory. The rest of the coastal littoral is in NATO hands: Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark. Russia controls a bit of coast between Lithuania and Poland because of its strange enclave of Kaliningrad. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in control of the far eastern corner of the Baltic Sea