A recount of ballots cast in the presidential election finally began yesterday -- the largest vote recount in Taiwan's history. The local media's old habits of reporting unconfirmed information and rumors will probably recur in the coming days as the judicial authorities carry out this notable event.
This phenomenon can be seen from yesterday's television coverage of the recount story. Taiwanese audiences will probably fall victim to endless live reports once again during the recount. The media organizations' abuse of the fourth right of democratic societies will drastically diminish their little remaining credibility.
Yao Jen-to (
Although this kind of survey is not entirely trustworthy and Yao's mention of the ranking was meant to satirize the news media, undeniably much harm has been done to Taiwan's media organizations since the presidential election campaign. The problem lies in the media's over-emphasis on sensationalism, and the competitive pressure to be the first to report a story -- even if this means not making efforts to confirm it.
The problem is that the "news stories" the media have fought to report first are not facts but inaccurate reports made up either by these media organizations or by others. On the evening of the presidential election, for instance, all cable TV channels used false numbers before 6 pm to mislead the public to believe that the pan-blue camp's candidates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
A call-in show host, Wang Ben-hu (
As the recount is under way, we understand that the pan-blue camp's aspiration is to alter the presidential election's results. The green camp hopes that the recount will prove that its victory has been legitimate.
Yet Taiwan's voters are also watching closely the two camps' performance during this period. Their decisions regarding which parties they will support in the year-end legislative election will be based on the camps' behavior during this event.
Both camps should therefore refrain from attempts to use the media to disseminate false information to influence the recount results. Otherwise they are not only making the media accomplices in the crime of destroying harmony in our society, but the politicians and parties that deliberately mislead the public also will be cast aside by the voters once the truth is known.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS