A recount of ballots cast in the presidential election finally began yesterday -- the largest vote recount in Taiwan's history. The local media's old habits of reporting unconfirmed information and rumors will probably recur in the coming days as the judicial authorities carry out this notable event.
This phenomenon can be seen from yesterday's television coverage of the recount story. Taiwanese audiences will probably fall victim to endless live reports once again during the recount. The media organizations' abuse of the fourth right of democratic societies will drastically diminish their little remaining credibility.
Yao Jen-to (
Although this kind of survey is not entirely trustworthy and Yao's mention of the ranking was meant to satirize the news media, undeniably much harm has been done to Taiwan's media organizations since the presidential election campaign. The problem lies in the media's over-emphasis on sensationalism, and the competitive pressure to be the first to report a story -- even if this means not making efforts to confirm it.
The problem is that the "news stories" the media have fought to report first are not facts but inaccurate reports made up either by these media organizations or by others. On the evening of the presidential election, for instance, all cable TV channels used false numbers before 6 pm to mislead the public to believe that the pan-blue camp's candidates, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
A call-in show host, Wang Ben-hu (
As the recount is under way, we understand that the pan-blue camp's aspiration is to alter the presidential election's results. The green camp hopes that the recount will prove that its victory has been legitimate.
Yet Taiwan's voters are also watching closely the two camps' performance during this period. Their decisions regarding which parties they will support in the year-end legislative election will be based on the camps' behavior during this event.
Both camps should therefore refrain from attempts to use the media to disseminate false information to influence the recount results. Otherwise they are not only making the media accomplices in the crime of destroying harmony in our society, but the politicians and parties that deliberately mislead the public also will be cast aside by the voters once the truth is known.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the