US Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly's congressional testimony well outlined the present policy of the US towards China and Taiwan. He pointed out that the Taiwan Relation Act is the foundation for the US to maintain peace and stability in the region and emphasized maintenance of the status quo as the best way to preserve stability.
He also made clear that it is irresponsible of leaders of both the US and Taiwan to treat China's military threats as meaningless. Taiwan should share the US's concern and should refrain from acts or rhetorical statements that may be misinterpreted. The US should also send a clear and unequivocal message to China that it views "any use of force against Taiwan with grave concern [and] will maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion against Taiwan." To alleviate tension, the US "continues to urge Beijing and Taipei to pursue dialogue as soon as possible through any available channels, without preconditions."
Meanwhile, the US commits itself to "explore with our friends in Taiwan" how to promote "Taiwan's successful story for democracy in Asia and around the world ... to a global audience, and how we [the United States] can help to make Taiwan's instructive example available to all countries that are attempting to institute democratic reform."
The plight of Taiwan is not the question of whether it is an independent country or whether it is generally recognized as a member of the international community. The US recognized Taiwan as a sovereign country until formal diplomatic relations was severed on Jan. 1, 1979. In so doing, instability was introduced into cross-strait relations.
Over the past 25 years, while democracy progressed in Taiwan and China's threats intensified, tension between the US, Taiwan and China has escalated. Circumstances have dramatically changed, particularly in Taiwan. Since the Shanghai Communique was entered into in 1978, Taiwan transformed itself from a dictatorship. Martial law was abolished; general elections were adapted for the election of members of parliament and the president.A constitution is to be made according to the free will of the people of Taiwan.
Twenty-five years ago, the US adapted its "one China " policy because the governments on both sides of the strait claimed their China was the real one. Now the "one China" policy obviously becomes the root of problem. It is time for the US to re-examine and update its policy toward Taiwan. The burden of using military force to deter China's "grave actions" against Taiwan rests almost entirely on the US. The US should shift part of this burden to the international community by allowing Taiwan to join international organizations as an international entity, if not a country.
Taiwan's success as a democracy and economic force certainly should not be overlooked by the international community.
The US should bring proof of Taiwan's governmental and economic success to the world's attention so that Taiwan's existence will be recognized, and the security of the western Pacific be supported by the international community and protected by the rule of law.
It is laudable that "the United States continues to be a strong supporter of Taiwan's participation in international organiza-tions." To implement this goal, the US must take the initiative. The effort of the US to attain these goals, based on past history, lacked initiative. The US efforts appeared to be at China's behest.
The US must be able to break through the barrier of appeasing China. Taiwan's participation in international organizations is as important as arms sales for maintaining peace and stability in the region.
International organizations are also a forum for Beijing and Taipei to pursue dialogue.
Y.T. Hung is a lawyer practicing in Virginia.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
RSS