The three times that Abbas Mehdi was interrogated by US soldiers, he claims that he told them the same thing: "I said, `You are creating enemies. You changed love into hate. Why do you make people hate you?'"
Released only two weeks ago from a succession of prisons here, Mehdi, a 51-year-old merchant with heart trouble, said he had not been treated as badly as the men he saw in photos that have shocked Iraq -- photos of black hoods, naked prisoners and leering American guards -- but roughly, all the same. It was not surprise that he felt when he saw the pictures on television last week, he said, but anger and disappointment at the US.
"I never would have expected this of them," said Mehdi, who said he was beaten so badly that he had to be hospitalized for three days after his arrest in December, when soldiers found a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, which he said was not his, in the garden of his rented house.
"They are civilized people. When the Americans came I was so happy. I said, `We will have democracy. We will have freedom,"' he said.
"After I was arrested," he added, "the picture changed."
Interviews with several former prisoners here turned up no accounts as horrifying as the military's own report on the abuse that took place at the hands of US soldiers in Abu Ghraib, Iraq's most notorious prison under former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, and apparently once again now.
But the prisoners and human rights officials said scores of complaints documented a pattern of excessively rough treatment, which they said made the recent reports of much worse treatment less difficult to believe. And the allegations come at a bad time for the yearlong occupation here -- already accused of heavy-handedness in the siege of the rebellious city of Fallujah -- when many Iraqis are prepared to believe the worst about Americans.
For example, Muhammad al-Mussawi, a lawyer with the Human Rights Organization in Iraq, said that as the fighting in Fallujah peaked early last month, women who were prisoners at Abu Ghraib smuggled out leaflets claiming that they had been raped.
"As educated people, we didn't believe this," Mussawi said. "But after the big shock on TV, we thought, `This could be true.'"
He referred to the barrage
of coverage of the abuse at Abu Ghraib.
It was not possible to verify the claims of the Iraqis who said in interviews that they had been mistreated by the Americans. But such claims are being reported in Iraq with much more attention now than in the past, including interviews with two of the men said to be in the photos broadcast Monday by the Arab news channel al-Jazeera.
A man who gave his name and age as Abu Ahmad, 30, said he was arrested in November on charges of carrying out attacks against Americans. He said he and other prisoners had been beaten regularly at Abu Ghraib and had been forced to strip naked and bend over a wall, leading him to believe he would be raped.
"I realized that the reason for this was to break the spirit of the detainees before interrogation," he told an Iraqi employee of The New York Times in Najaf, the Shiite holy city south of Baghdad where the rebel cleric Muqtada al-Sadr is hiding out from the US military.
He maintained that he had
had nothing to do with al-Sadr's militia, the Mehdi Army, until after he was released from prison.
"The Americans are an occupation force, not liberators, and we should fight to force them out of Iraq," he said.
Human rights officials say most of the complaints they have heard centered not on treatment in prisons but on the arrests. US soldiers, they complain, burst into houses with excessive force, breaking furniture and windows, using
foul language, placing hoods over suspects' heads and, often, beating them.
Mehdi said he was arrested
on the night of Dec. 2, when six
soldiers barged into his house, pointing guns at him, his wife and his children. He said they had handcuffed him, kicked him in the abdomen and placed a black hood on his head. In the garden, he said, the soldiers made him kneel down as they retrieved the rocket-propelled grenade launcher from a clay oven in the yard -- where he said, it had been planted by his landlord, who wanted to evict him.
Then, he said, one of the soldiers -- he said he could not see who because of the hood -- urinated on him.
"I could smell it," he said.
After what he said was a rough interrogation at a small military base, he was taken to a military hospital because of his heart condition and because he was beaten so badly. He said he stayed three days and had been treated every bit as well there as a wounded US officer in the bed next to him.
"I spoke with a nurse, and I told her: `I'm really confused. At the base, they beat me and tortured me. Here they treat me like a human being,'" he said. "She said, `They are animals.'"
Mowafak Sami, 28, a lawyer who has brought a legal claim against the US military, said he was arrested with his father and two brothers in early March, originally, he said, on suspicion of financing anti-US insurgents. During the arrest, he said, one soldier struck him with the barrel of his gun, blackening his eyes and opening a gash on his left brow.
In the prison at Baghdad International Airport, he said, he and other prisoners, including his 56-year-old father, a former general and construction company
owner with several contracts for rebuilding the country's wrecked infrastructure, were forced to
do knee bends until they were
exhausted. He said that at other times they were forced to stand on one leg, with both arms in the air, for an hour at a time.
His father was released after five days, and he was let out four days later, but his two brothers are still in prison, he said.
"We were very happy when the regime fell," he said, referring to the toppling of Saddam last year. "We were optimistic.
"But this savage process -- arresting the innocents, house raiding, attacking houses with bombs -- makes us feel aggressive against the coalition forces," he said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS