The three times that Abbas Mehdi was interrogated by US soldiers, he claims that he told them the same thing: "I said, `You are creating enemies. You changed love into hate. Why do you make people hate you?'"
Released only two weeks ago from a succession of prisons here, Mehdi, a 51-year-old merchant with heart trouble, said he had not been treated as badly as the men he saw in photos that have shocked Iraq -- photos of black hoods, naked prisoners and leering American guards -- but roughly, all the same. It was not surprise that he felt when he saw the pictures on television last week, he said, but anger and disappointment at the US.
"I never would have expected this of them," said Mehdi, who said he was beaten so badly that he had to be hospitalized for three days after his arrest in December, when soldiers found a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, which he said was not his, in the garden of his rented house.
"They are civilized people. When the Americans came I was so happy. I said, `We will have democracy. We will have freedom,"' he said.
"After I was arrested," he added, "the picture changed."
Interviews with several former prisoners here turned up no accounts as horrifying as the military's own report on the abuse that took place at the hands of US soldiers in Abu Ghraib, Iraq's most notorious prison under former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, and apparently once again now.
But the prisoners and human rights officials said scores of complaints documented a pattern of excessively rough treatment, which they said made the recent reports of much worse treatment less difficult to believe. And the allegations come at a bad time for the yearlong occupation here -- already accused of heavy-handedness in the siege of the rebellious city of Fallujah -- when many Iraqis are prepared to believe the worst about Americans.
For example, Muhammad al-Mussawi, a lawyer with the Human Rights Organization in Iraq, said that as the fighting in Fallujah peaked early last month, women who were prisoners at Abu Ghraib smuggled out leaflets claiming that they had been raped.
"As educated people, we didn't believe this," Mussawi said. "But after the big shock on TV, we thought, `This could be true.'"
He referred to the barrage
of coverage of the abuse at Abu Ghraib.
It was not possible to verify the claims of the Iraqis who said in interviews that they had been mistreated by the Americans. But such claims are being reported in Iraq with much more attention now than in the past, including interviews with two of the men said to be in the photos broadcast Monday by the Arab news channel al-Jazeera.
A man who gave his name and age as Abu Ahmad, 30, said he was arrested in November on charges of carrying out attacks against Americans. He said he and other prisoners had been beaten regularly at Abu Ghraib and had been forced to strip naked and bend over a wall, leading him to believe he would be raped.
"I realized that the reason for this was to break the spirit of the detainees before interrogation," he told an Iraqi employee of The New York Times in Najaf, the Shiite holy city south of Baghdad where the rebel cleric Muqtada al-Sadr is hiding out from the US military.
He maintained that he had
had nothing to do with al-Sadr's militia, the Mehdi Army, until after he was released from prison.
"The Americans are an occupation force, not liberators, and we should fight to force them out of Iraq," he said.
Human rights officials say most of the complaints they have heard centered not on treatment in prisons but on the arrests. US soldiers, they complain, burst into houses with excessive force, breaking furniture and windows, using
foul language, placing hoods over suspects' heads and, often, beating them.
Mehdi said he was arrested
on the night of Dec. 2, when six
soldiers barged into his house, pointing guns at him, his wife and his children. He said they had handcuffed him, kicked him in the abdomen and placed a black hood on his head. In the garden, he said, the soldiers made him kneel down as they retrieved the rocket-propelled grenade launcher from a clay oven in the yard -- where he said, it had been planted by his landlord, who wanted to evict him.
Then, he said, one of the soldiers -- he said he could not see who because of the hood -- urinated on him.
"I could smell it," he said.
After what he said was a rough interrogation at a small military base, he was taken to a military hospital because of his heart condition and because he was beaten so badly. He said he stayed three days and had been treated every bit as well there as a wounded US officer in the bed next to him.
"I spoke with a nurse, and I told her: `I'm really confused. At the base, they beat me and tortured me. Here they treat me like a human being,'" he said. "She said, `They are animals.'"
Mowafak Sami, 28, a lawyer who has brought a legal claim against the US military, said he was arrested with his father and two brothers in early March, originally, he said, on suspicion of financing anti-US insurgents. During the arrest, he said, one soldier struck him with the barrel of his gun, blackening his eyes and opening a gash on his left brow.
In the prison at Baghdad International Airport, he said, he and other prisoners, including his 56-year-old father, a former general and construction company
owner with several contracts for rebuilding the country's wrecked infrastructure, were forced to
do knee bends until they were
exhausted. He said that at other times they were forced to stand on one leg, with both arms in the air, for an hour at a time.
His father was released after five days, and he was let out four days later, but his two brothers are still in prison, he said.
"We were very happy when the regime fell," he said, referring to the toppling of Saddam last year. "We were optimistic.
"But this savage process -- arresting the innocents, house raiding, attacking houses with bombs -- makes us feel aggressive against the coalition forces," he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing