Contrary to his image as a humble and gentle politician, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
In a city government meeting on disaster relief on Monday, Ma reminded city officials and military personnel to prepare for a Chinese military invasion. He seems to believe that tensions across the Taiwan Strait still exist and that Taipei, especially the Chungchen and Hsinyi districts, would be the primary targets of a Chinese attack in case of war.
Then, in a newspaper article published yesterday, Ma wrote that he had opposed the central government telling the public that holding a referendum and enacting a new constitution are universal values, as well as ways to love Taiwan and support democracy. In his article, Ma stressed that "Taiwan indepen-dence, referendums and writing a new constitution" have gradually evolved into a new holy trinity -- an infallible moral cult that cannot be challenged.
Why did Ma only mentioned the Chungcheng and Hsinyi districts while leaving out the Ta-an District, where many government officials reside? He also omitted other military districts that are equipped with the ability to counter a Chinese attack.
Moreover, aren't referendums and writing a new constitution universal values endorsed by democratic societies? Why are these two necessarily jointed with Taiwan independence? While Ma reproached the green camp for labelling others at will, he should not couple Taiwan independence -- a unique political ideal -- with the universal values of referendum and writing a new constitution. If the new holy trinity was really an infallible moral cult, as Ma has claimed, how could he question it himself?
Ma's argument reflects that many blue-camp leaders have yet to overcome the frustration of losing the election; they appear dazed and confused. They are still threatening Taipei residents by claiming that China may attack Taiwan by force if the green camp continues to rule. They cannot see the potential crises that may occur during the inauguration.
Not only have some people publicly vowed to assassinate President Chen Shui-bian (
Looking at the logic Ma has used, it is clear that he's still looking back at those unpleasant days in the past, and has forgotten about protecting the important national event in front of him. Democratic rule of law is the basis for this nation to survive. It surpasses the interest of any one political party. If the presidential inauguration is ruined, Ma's political career will also be ruined. Is this want he wants?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath