Last Wednesday, after Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) proposed to cool China's breakneck economic growth, Taiwan's stock market plunged 10 percent in three days. The NT dollar also continued to lose ground. But his announcement came as no surprise.
The possibility of China losing control of its overheated economy has posed a long-standing problem for officials. Economists around the globe have their eyes glued on China. The pegging of the Chinese yuan to the US dollar has kept the yuan quite strong, other governments are pressing China to revalue its own currencies. The strength of the yuan has also increased the flow of hot money into the Chinese market and has invited creeping inflation. Although a appreciated yuan had been expected, Wen's announcement that China's feverish economy would be calmed to some degree still managed to trouble stock markets across Asia.
Taiwan must pay close attention to China's economic situation. With the nation's exports to China exceeding 36 percent of total exports, China has overtaken the US as the nation's biggest trading partner. Therefore, the maintenance of a smooth trade relationship across the Taiwan Strait is becoming yet more critical in safeguarding national economic development.
Unlike the "trade over investment" approach to the Chinese market adopted by many other countries, Taiwan has been dumping valuable investment resources rather than engaging in trade with China. "China fever" has accelerated not only Taiwan's capital hemorrhage but also the outflow of talent and technology. Many Taiwanese businesspeople, after investing in and setting up factories in China, return to compete with domestic companies, thus weakening Taiwan's long-term competitiveness.
Indispensable as they are for cooling down an overheating economy, Wen's measures highlight the fact that China's economy is still curbed by an authoritarian government. In the face of economic fluctuation, governments of most capitalist economies let the market determine interest and exchange rates, and hence currency supply and demand. It is uncommon for a government to intervene too closely in economic activity, except when drastic changes occur in the market.
Ignoring market forces, Beijing is attempting to rein in its economy by executive order, putting a halt to major construction and investment projects both nationally and locally. Such strong-arm tactics may illustrate the Chinese government's determination, yet it totally disregards the market, thereby wreaking havoc on the interests of local and foreign investors. It is the non-economic risks of investing in China that most suffering foreign investors have neglected.
Beijing's measures hope to cause only short-term harm -- but with it long-term benefit. No one, however, can be sure that similar measures will not be adopted in future to tighten the economy, nor can one predict the scope, duration or impact of any other measures on industry.
There is one thing of which we can be sure: Beijing's heavy-handed policy has on this occasion served as valuable shock therapy for China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and foreign investors. Investing in China is not as profitable as it appears after all. The capitalist's gold mine is actually a minefield of concealed dangers of every variety -- and the economy is merely one of them.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS