Last Wednesday, after Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) proposed to cool China's breakneck economic growth, Taiwan's stock market plunged 10 percent in three days. The NT dollar also continued to lose ground. But his announcement came as no surprise.
The possibility of China losing control of its overheated economy has posed a long-standing problem for officials. Economists around the globe have their eyes glued on China. The pegging of the Chinese yuan to the US dollar has kept the yuan quite strong, other governments are pressing China to revalue its own currencies. The strength of the yuan has also increased the flow of hot money into the Chinese market and has invited creeping inflation. Although a appreciated yuan had been expected, Wen's announcement that China's feverish economy would be calmed to some degree still managed to trouble stock markets across Asia.
Taiwan must pay close attention to China's economic situation. With the nation's exports to China exceeding 36 percent of total exports, China has overtaken the US as the nation's biggest trading partner. Therefore, the maintenance of a smooth trade relationship across the Taiwan Strait is becoming yet more critical in safeguarding national economic development.
Unlike the "trade over investment" approach to the Chinese market adopted by many other countries, Taiwan has been dumping valuable investment resources rather than engaging in trade with China. "China fever" has accelerated not only Taiwan's capital hemorrhage but also the outflow of talent and technology. Many Taiwanese businesspeople, after investing in and setting up factories in China, return to compete with domestic companies, thus weakening Taiwan's long-term competitiveness.
Indispensable as they are for cooling down an overheating economy, Wen's measures highlight the fact that China's economy is still curbed by an authoritarian government. In the face of economic fluctuation, governments of most capitalist economies let the market determine interest and exchange rates, and hence currency supply and demand. It is uncommon for a government to intervene too closely in economic activity, except when drastic changes occur in the market.
Ignoring market forces, Beijing is attempting to rein in its economy by executive order, putting a halt to major construction and investment projects both nationally and locally. Such strong-arm tactics may illustrate the Chinese government's determination, yet it totally disregards the market, thereby wreaking havoc on the interests of local and foreign investors. It is the non-economic risks of investing in China that most suffering foreign investors have neglected.
Beijing's measures hope to cause only short-term harm -- but with it long-term benefit. No one, however, can be sure that similar measures will not be adopted in future to tighten the economy, nor can one predict the scope, duration or impact of any other measures on industry.
There is one thing of which we can be sure: Beijing's heavy-handed policy has on this occasion served as valuable shock therapy for China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and foreign investors. Investing in China is not as profitable as it appears after all. The capitalist's gold mine is actually a minefield of concealed dangers of every variety -- and the economy is merely one of them.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS