The World Health Organization (WHO) is convening its annual World Health Assembly (WHA) later this month in Geneva. So President Chen Shui-bian (
Because this platform does not involve the conflict over Taiwan's national sovereignty, and because Chen's re-election has established Taiwan as a model for democracy in Asia, the international community should accord Taiwan just and fair treatment on this issue. The international community cannot continue to bow to China's unreasonable pressure and keep isolating Taiwan and its people.
Despite support from the US and Japan, Taiwan's attempts to win WHO membership were pre-empted for the seventh time at the WHA meeting last June.
Few have forgotten how China's representative to the UN in Geneva, Sha Zukang (
Last year, the Chinese dictators concealed the SARS outbreak and created a global epidemic that caused great economic and social harm in many countries, and particularly in Taiwan.
As the SARS epidemic hit Taiwan and created a need for international assistance, Beijing claimed SARS was a domestic issue and kept the WHO and other international medical organizations from helping Taiwan. China's Vice Premier Wu Yi (
When Taiwan's lonely fight against SARS was won and it was willing to share its experiences and medical resources with other countries, Beijing applied further pressure to keep Taiwan's health officials and organizations from participating in international medical meetings. China relied on its satellite states to block Taiwan's accession to the WHO.
This treachery showed Taiwan's people the Chinese leadership's true colors. But it also lent legitimacy to Chen's decision to hold the nation's first-ever referen-dum, and it helped the Democratic Progressive Party find a major theme for its presidential election campaign -- holding hands to protect Taiwan and to defy China's threats.
China cannot have expected that its suppression of Taiwan's attempts to gain WHO entry would mark the beginning of a new Taiwanese consciousness.
Almost a year later, Sha's poisonous question continues to have unintended positive effects. Chen and Taiwanese consciousness won the presidential election with a majority of the vote.
During the campaign, even China-friendly politicians from the anti-independence Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party were forced to criticize China and use strong language to warn Beijing against further offending Taiwan's people.
Further from home, EU countries now follow the US and Japan in expressing their support for Taiwan's democratic achievements. These allies are willing to help Taiwan participate in the international community on normalized and equal terms.
Will the Chinese government finally wake up and accept Taiwanese mainstream opinion? Beijing often claims to pin its hopes on Taiwan's people.
The WHA offers China a great opportunity to turn savagery into benevolence and political considerations into human concern. We hope that Beijing's new generation of leaders will see that continuing its past tough approach will only further alienate the Taiwanese people.
A humane and sensible approach would reflect the demeanor of a great power. But if China persists in its old bullying attitudes, Taiwan's year-end legislative elections will result in yet another slap to Beijing's face.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this