The pan-blue post-election effort to reverse the voters' decision has stumbled badly over the issue of the attack on President Chen Shui-bian (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Lee dispatched three experts to visit the crime scene, review the evidence, interview witnesses and check out the Criminal Investigations Bureau and Tainan prosecutors' investigative efforts.
The team did all that and more, even obtaining permission to examine Chen's wound.
Their conclusion: Chen and Lu indeed appear to have been shot on March 19, and at the time that cameras and witnesses suggest they were shot. One of the experts, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Coroner Cyril Wecht -- who was highly critical of the controversial Warren Commission investigation of the 1963 assassination of former US president John Kennedy -- said: "Everything is completely consistent -- no discrepancies, nothing strange." He said that the president's wound "is completely consistent with a gunshot wound," and added that the investigation of the incident was being conducted in a "completely open way -- not the way it was done in 1963 in America."
If that is the case, and given who invited Wecht and his colleagues into this investigation in the first place (a point not mentioned in most media reports), one has to wonder at Lien and Soong's further demands. Why the need for another "independent" investigation of the shootings if the current investigation is being done openly and handled well according to their own experts?
Meanwhile, if the investigation so far suggests that the shooting was a genuine attack on the president and vice president, how on earth can the pan-blue team claim, as they are now doing, that the decision to put the military and police around the country on alert was simply a political scheme to keep soldiers and cops from voting? I would argue that had the government not put the military and police on some kind of higher alert status following the attack, it would have been at best derelict, and at worst, open to the suspicion that somebody knew the shootings were bogus.
I can state with some confidence that if the president and vice president of the US were shot and wounded at the same time, and if the perpetrators were not immediately caught, the US would be on a high state of alert. (Why do people think US Vice President Dick Cheney has spent most of his time since Sept. 11 in hiding?)
Certainly there are questions that should be answered: Who came up with the foolish idea of having Chen and Lu repeatedly appear in public together? And who could have come up with the equally foolish idea of having them ride down crowded streets in an open jeep?
But at this point, continuing to charge that the shootings may have been staged, as the pan-blue leaders are doing, is nothing but dangerous demagoguery.
A recount in such a close election, carefully monitored and openly done under court supervision, makes absolute sense.
As for the rest of the pan-blue demands, charges and insinuations, they should be seen clearly for what they are -- the desperate ploy of people who have lost but won't admit it.
Dave Lindorff is a Fulbright Senior Scholar in residence at National Sun Yat-sen University.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS