The first court hearing in the suit filed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Apparently the KMT-PFP alliance has again changed its mind -- now, instead of a total recount of the votes, it wants a partial recount of only those votes cast for President Chen Shui-bian (
This news came as a surprise even to the alliance's most loyal supporters -- those who have been chanting "immediate and total recount" for two weeks at rallies that have been taking place at the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall or in front of the KMT headquarters. Reportedly, some of them couldn't help but ask, "Isn't it more fair to have a total recount?"
Indeed, leaving aside the sense of frustration that the KMT-PFP alliance's indecisiveness has produced, the popular consensus built since the election has been for a total recount, not a partial recount. It was due to this overwhelming public expectation that Chen and Lu waived their legal rights and agreed to a total recount. Otherwise, according to the Presidential Election and Recall Law (
Moreover, no one who genuinely wishes to resolve all disputes regarding the votes once and for all can be satisfied with a partial recount, which would forever leave the country under a cloud of skepticism about the election result. A partial recount could only be bad for the stability of the country.
Besides, during the hearing on Friday, Lien and Soong's attorneys charged that the numbers of votes cast for the two camps had been erroneously reversed in some cases. In order to verify whether that accusation is correct, the votes cast for both camps would of course have to be recounted. Otherwise, the recount would be meaningless.
The main reason that the KMT-PFP alliance is asking for a partial recount is that it is unwilling to fork out money for the enormous expenses that would be entailed in a complete recount. According to KMT Secretary-General Lin Fong-cheng (
Since Chen and Lu are the defendants being dragged into this lawsuit and are cooperating out of good faith, the pan-blue camp just doesn't seem to be playing fair. This is not to mention that since, according to current law, the party losing the lawsuit will have to pay for a recount when all is said and done, all these calculations and conniving about who should pick up the bill just seem like a waste of time.
Moreover, it isn't as if the KMT-PFP alliance does not have the money to pay for a recount. Leaving aside its own great wealth, it is receiving around NT$200 million (US$6.06 million) from the government -- NT$30 for each vote garnered -- as a campaign subsidy.
Finally, since the alliance can afford to run whole-page ads in major newspapers on a daily basis to make wild allegations against the government and the president, it is hard to believe that it cannot pay for a recount.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers