I am very disappointed, as a second-generation Mainlander in Taiwan, at the recent comments by the Coalition for Equal Opportunity (族群平等行動聯盟). I think the coalition's opinion on Taiwan's ethnicity problem only spotlights superficial harmony and lacks a deep reflection on history. From their perspective, it seems that anyone who proposes to examine ethnic inequality in Taiwan's history is guilty of accumulating ethnic hatred and escalating antagonism. I strongly oppose such thinking.
I think the key to easing ethnic tension lies in the Mainlanders' attitude. Politically and economically privileged in the past, Mainlanders should engage in public and continuous reflection and discussion of the inequalities of their past rule over other ethnic groups like Hoklo (more commonly known as Taiwanese), Hakka and Aboriginals. Also, politicians of Mainlander ancestry should educate and guide their Mainlander supporters to reflect on the privileged status they have enjoyed for a long time and not haggle over whether they are treated equally or misunderstood by other ethnic groups.
As my age and learning increase, I gradually realize how my status as a child of a serviceman led to my being treated better by the government than other ethnic groups because the government did not fairly distribute social welfare resources. At the same time, I have also recognized that, under the hegemonic Chinese culture at the center of which is the Mainlander group, Mainlanders often involuntarily reveal a superiority complex while Hoklo, Hakka and indigenous cultures are distorted and marginalized.
Admittedly, not all Mainlanders have enjoyed vested interests and a privileged status. There are also quite a few Mainlanders opposing "cultural hegemonism." However, to wash off the historical sediment of past ethnic injustice requires more energy and effort from the Mainlanders. Which politician of Mainlander ancestry is willing to stand up to oppose the preferential interest rate, a policy that distorts an equal distribution of social welfare, and the proposal to rebuild the veterans' communities?
What disheartens me more is that quite a few Mainlanders (and among them are many of my father's friends) still misunderstand and hold a grudge against Taiwan's democratic movement.
More than 10 years ago, I participated in a student demonstration and my kind father was suddenly beleaguered with blame from his friends. They claimed my father had not fulfilled his duty to educate his son and urged my father to repent for this piece of negligence. Amid this storm of criticism, my father, with tears running down his cheeks, warned me not to support the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) anymore, saying that someday the DPP would kick him and his friends back to China.
Surely, we Mainlanders did not choose to put ourselves in such an embarrassing position in history. We did not ask for privileges or deliberately antagonize others. Instead, we were made flag-waving and slogan-chanting puppets of the former authoritarian regime.This is a tragedy.
However, if Mainlanders can look closely at their situation, willingly shoulder the burden of historical mistakes and redress collective ethnic injustice, we will be able to transcend the destiny wrought by history and blood-ties. Then, we will taste the sweet fruit of true freedom.
Only by opening the scar and re-cleansing the wound can the festering sore be healed. Inward-looking reflection, I believe, is a better way to promote ethnic equality than the "alliance through blood donation" praised by the Coalition for Equal Opportunity.
Wong Ping-yun is a lawyer.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,