Beijing is wielding the big stick against Hong Kong. This must worry Taiwan, if it were to contemplate union with China. Hong Kong, after all, is supposed to be the model for an autonomous Taiwan. Beijing is now pointedly telling Hong Kong that it should learn to live within the parameters laid down by China, or else.
Worried by the democrats' gains in the district council elections last November, Beijing is determined not to let it get repeated in the September legislative polls. A senior Chinese official has warned Hong Kong democrats to toe the line or face the consequences. He reportedly said, "I have a knife. Normally, I would not use it. Now it is the democrats who force me to use it."
When asked by the assembled journalists in the territory to amplify the word "knife," he added, "Please note that the Basic Law has provided for the dissolution of the legislature." And to make clear that Beijing was not simply bluffing, he said that they replaced the British-sponsored legislature under then-governor Chris Patten after China took over the territory in mid-1997, as they had warned.
For added emphasis, he said that at the time "our national power was still far behind what it is today, and yet we still had the courage to do so." He elaborated, "Given our greater economic might now and Hong Kong's heavy dependency on China," Beijing wouldn't hesitate to abolish a democratic legislature working against its dictate. And: "We are not afraid that such a move would trigger capital flight."
Beijing's warning is primarily directed at the territory's democrats and the people in general; though it is also meant to ward off international disquiet and criticism -- from the US in particular. One might recall that it was unnerved by the massive public protest last July against the proposed draconian internal security law and had to back off. The subsequent district council elections in November only showed that the democratic sentiment was alive as ever.
Hence, the need to forewarn that any attempt by a newly elected legislature to speed up the process of democratization for universal franchise to elect the territory's chief executive by 2007 and the legislature by 2008 will not be tolerated. In other words, Hong Kong could end up losing its "autonomy."
At about the same time, Bei-jing was telling Hong Kong Secretary for Administration Donald Tsang (
Beijing spelled out two more conditions. First, in the "one country, two systems" model, "one country" must always take precedence over "two systems." Two, the center would honor Hong Kong's status as a special admin-istrative region only with "patriots" as the linchpin of the system. In other words, it would like to exclude democrats not approved by Beijing -- notwithstanding their popular appeal.
And who are these unpatriotic people? They are members of organizations aiming to overthrow the communist regime in China. This refers specially to the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, formed in 1989 to protest against the Tiananmen democracy movement crackdown. Always a thorn in China's side, it has invited even more ire by the disclosure of its chairman, Szeto Wah, that he had spurned Beijing's overtures to step down in exchange for speedier democratization in Hong Kong.
It is noteworthy that Beijing's definition of "patriots" excludes people who refuse to equate communist rule with loyalty to the motherland. They don't buy the party line that it has the monopoly on political power and hence the credentials to demand absolute loyalty indistinguishable from the nation.
But Hong Kong is a dilemma because Beijing is committed to a special autonomous status for the territory with a timetable for implementation of universal suffrage by 2007 and 2008. Beijing, though, is not keen on doing this for fear of losing total control of the territory's political process and its deeper implications for China. And it is prepared to go to any length to thwart the democratization process unless it was carefully crafted with the legislators doing its bidding as "patriots."
Such naked exercise of coercive power, which threatens the spirit, if not the letter, of the law enshrining a special 50-year status for Hong Kong, has an important message for Taiwan. Beijing has by now created an important constituency in Taiwan keen to broadly toe the Chinese line. For them, the absence of crude political interference in Hong Kong's governing process could become an acceptable model (with some variations and over a period of time) for another "one country" and "two systems." But, as we have seen, Hong Kong is now receiving an alternative message to shape up or ship out with its special status.
Compared to Hong Kong, Taiwan is much more evolved as a political entity with its own democratic processes and institutions. The nation will find it hard to compromise itself to fit into Beijing's policy. Even more difficult will be the requirement to equate the communist party rule with loyalty to the nation, with no hope in the foreseeable future of living under a plural and changeable political system. The coming presidential election will, therefore, be an interesting barometer of Taiwan's political weather.
Sushil Seth is a freelance writer based in Sydney.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder