Hong Kong is a poor model
Beijing's "one country, two systems" scheme is quickly revealing its true colors ("Hong Kong reform talks `just show,'" Feb. 17, page 1).
To add credibility to its unification plan, Beijing promised in 1997 that it would leave Hong Kong's socioeconomic system and way of life unchanged for 50 years. Pundits praised Bei-jing for assuring Hong Kong's anxious residents.
Ironically Beijing now can make good on this "generous" offer and deprive Hong Kong of a chance to democratize (perhaps until 2047) because the territory, despite its many freedoms, was not a democracy in 1997. If Beijing feels insecure, Hong Kong cannot democratize. Thus, "one country, two systems" looks increasingly like "one country, one system" -- China's, not Hong Kong's.
Before the handover the international community erroneously focused on whether Chinese tanks would roll through Hong Kong's streets. The real threat turns out to be China's steady encroachment on Hong Kong's freedoms. This is hardly a model for Taiwan.
Vincent Wang
Richmond, Virginia
Going for the record
I was pleased to see you chose the "overwhelming support" for the human-chain rally as your lead story ("Human-chain rally gathering steam," Feb. 17, page 1). I wonder exactly what a scheduled participant is, but if more than 1 million people have already stated their intention to participate, then it is a good start.
The Guinness Book of Records states that the longest human chain ever was up to 2 million people long and stretched 595km across the three Baltic states of Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
Maybe we have a chance. Maybe this is something people can get excited about. Wouldn't that make some blue-camp politicians grimace! And they would probably have to join in too.
Interestingly, and perhaps propitiously for Taiwan, the record-setting event was a big deal politically. At that time, in 1989, some nations had already escaped the grasp of Soviet rule, but the Baltic states hadn't. To quote the Central Europe Review, "this unprecedented protest action against Soviet rule brought the national liberation movements into the spotlight, setting an irreversible course for the three captive nations."
The event was held on the 50th anniversary of the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression treaty which led to the illegal invasion and occupation of those countries by the USSR. The rally was essentially a declaration of independence by the people, parallel to the Velvet Revolution or the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was followed by two turbulent years of ineffective repression by the USSR until the three states officially declared their independence and were quickly recognized both de jure and de facto by Iceland.
Interestingly, the US was among the very last countries to follow suit.
So now I wonder how many will actually turn out on Feb. 28. It doesn't matter if the record is broken or not. It will be another fine attempt to trump repression with mass-action nonviolence.
Who knows? Maybe it will turn out to be more important than either the election or the referendum. Maybe we can make a chain around the whole island next time. Or a giant happy face. That would surely make headlines around the world and redden Beijing's face.
Peter Dearman
Taipei
Soong is shameless
Your recent article ("Soong rails against `illegal' referendum and refuses to vote," Feb. 18, page 3) tells clearly that, after all these years, People First Party Chair-man James Soong (宋楚瑜) is still conspiring to deprive the Tai-wanese people of freedom of speech. Soong's mentality remains the same as when he headed the Government Information Office under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime in the martial-law era.
In those dark days, he was the one who did not observe the law and illegally suppressed people's viewpoints. Sadly, he is now shamelessly running for the office of vice president of a full-fledged democratic Taiwan.
He can't have his cake and eat it too.
Taitzer Wang
Cincinnati, Ohio
Stop gravel mining
I'm an American who has been in Taiwan for nearly 20 years, living in Taitung for 11 years of them. You should be aware that every day nearly 1,000 gravel trucks are carrying gravel out of Taitung. Every single riverbed from Tawu to Taitung is being systematically stripped.
The highway is falling into the ocean, the bridge stanchions are eroding away.
I don't know if gravel mining in the riverbeds and on the shore is legal, but it is sure to be a major environmental disaster in the very near future. The wetlands where the birds migrate are destroyed. The beaches near the river mouths are already washed away, rendering the coastline useless and eroding the bedrock below the recently completed four-lane coastal highway.
Ironically, at the same time, the national government is spending billions on developing the area for tourism.
This has already been going on for the past three months. It started shortly after the Taitung County Council decided not to accept the proposal for the nuclear waste repository. You should consider that the current gravel mining may be a reprisal for this, especially considering that the majority of the mining is being done in the Tawu area.
The current rate of mining deserves the immediate attention of the appropriate branches of government. And an environmental impact study should be conducted before the mining continues. The current condition is reckless, irresponsible and shows absolutely no respect for common decency, the environment or common sense. When the rainy season comes and the typhoon season comes, the damage done will surely be in the billions of NT dollars.
I'm told that the gravel industry and government officials who turn their backs on this kind of activity are `dangerous people' and that I should do nothing, say nothing, for my own safety. But I don't believe that. I have known only polite and courteous people here, in every branch of government. I'm sure that they simply don't realize what they are doing.
Malcolm Vargas
Taitung
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS