President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) plans to hold Taiwan's first referendum on the day of the presidential election. This major democratic occurrence has become a thorn in the side to the blue camp and it has joined up with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in reviling it. Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) even prompted French President Jacques Chirac to condemn the referendum.
The wave of referendum bashing has proved one thing: democracy did not fall from the skies. It has been brought to us by hardworking people with a sense of mission. Over the past decade, Taiwanese society has been influenced by the unification media's constant nihilism. Fewer people have a sense of democratic mission, but, luckily, political leaders such as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen have not lost their way. They have spent more time considering the great Taiwanese democracy plan.
During his presidency, Lee engineered the re-election of the whole legislature and direct presidential elections, froze the provincial government and scrapped the National Assembly. He also declared the "special state-to-state" model of cross-strait relations. This was Lee's "democratic line."
In addition to his powerful advocacy of "one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait," Chen last year announced "referendum, legislative reform and the drawing up of a new constitution," or Chen's "democratic line," which has had conservative anti-reform groups jumping with rage.
Not a single item in Lee's and Chen's democratic lines escapes China's vilifications. As the CCP rails, Taiwanese unificationist politicians and media dance to China's tune, gradually creating anti-Lee and anti-Chen sentiment.
For example, ever since the referendum was first mentioned, it has been vilified and satirized by the hypocritical unificationist China Times.
Immediately after the CCP started railing against the referendum, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did the same. Chen was even, inexplicably, called a "criminal caught in the act."
Does a referendum bite? Is democracy a frightful beast? Those afraid of letting the people be in charge are the ones possessed by beasts. Ma used to be the biggest opponent of Lee's democratic line. Now he rants and raves over the referendum plan. Although Ma is not willing to give up his anti-democratic ways, he still wants to enjoy the fruits of democracy. Lien or Soong never supported Lee, they only wanted power that Lee could not give. Now they revile Chen's democratic line, which is only appropriate for someone who sees no shame in being the spokesman of those wanting to restore authoritarianism.
When the founder of the China Times was still alive -- and neither the faction advocating popular election of the president nor the faction advocating election by committee would yield -- it was still capable of neutrality. Now that the founder's son has taken over, there are merciless attacks on Chen's democratic efforts at holding a referendum.
How can such a paper have the nerve to call itself a member of the intelligentsia? If the people really are master, can holding a referendum to show their will be such a bad thing? Such media and politicians would fit in better in China than in Taiwan.
Chen faces tough challenges. Only one thing is certain -- he is tough and daring to break through his limitations. I'm sure he will follow through with the referendum. I hope the Democratic Progressive Party will remember its leader's difficult situation and make an effort to protect his democratic line, for the sake of Taiwan.
Lao Pao is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS