Tuntex group boss Chen Yu-hao (
On Monday morning, Chen was back in the news after faxing letters to the media and pan-blue legislators accusing President Chen Shui-bian (
Tuntex started out in real-estate development and expanded into textiles, cement, petrochemicals and telecommunications. The conglomerate enjoyed various privileges from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime. KMT-run companies invested in all of Tuntex's subsidiaries.
According to estimates by the Taiwanese media, Chen Yu-hao, his wife and children left behind debts totaling NT$50 billion in Taiwan. After he was indicted and failed to answer a court summons, the Taipei District Court issued an arrest warrant last May.
Chen Yu-hao has hidden away in the US and China, refusing to return to Taiwan to answer any summons on the grounds of illness or business-related travel. He is apparently now in Hong Kong. CTiTV aired an exclusive interview with him yesterday, thereby showing his pretext for not returning to Taiwan -- that he was not fit enough to fly back -- to be a lie.
Chen Yu-hao's propensity to tell lies is quite well known in Taiwan's financial circles. The worst example dates back to 2000, when reports about a financial crisis in the Tuntex group first arose. When Tuntex asked the government for a bail-out, the Ministry of Finance and the central bank invited more than 50 banks to help find a way for Tuntex to weather the crisis. The banks agreed to lower their interest rates and adopt other measures to reduce Tuntex's financial burden. One month after the bail-out, however, reports began to emerge that Chen Yu-hao was making massive investments in China.
As for the timing of Chen Yu-hao's letters, apart from retaliating against the government for issuing an arrest warrant, he may also be hoping to boost his chances of returning home if the pan-blue ticket wins the election. Otherwise, he has nowhere to go and can only rely on Beijing for survival. It is also possible that he is pandering to Beijing's political needs and attacking the government to show his loyalty to China -- perhaps in the hope of protecting his investments there.
No matter what Chen Yu-hao's motivation, voters and the media should think long and hard about the character of this man -- and not be willing to dance to the tune of an unscrupulous person. The Beijing regime has frequently used behind-the-scene maneuvers to attack its enemies -- in China, in Taiwan and elsewhere. If Beijing's strategy proves effective, then the destiny of the Taiwanese people could be similar to those of Hong Kong and Macau -- meat on Beijing's chopping block.
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS