Tuntex group boss Chen Yu-hao (
On Monday morning, Chen was back in the news after faxing letters to the media and pan-blue legislators accusing President Chen Shui-bian (
Tuntex started out in real-estate development and expanded into textiles, cement, petrochemicals and telecommunications. The conglomerate enjoyed various privileges from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime. KMT-run companies invested in all of Tuntex's subsidiaries.
According to estimates by the Taiwanese media, Chen Yu-hao, his wife and children left behind debts totaling NT$50 billion in Taiwan. After he was indicted and failed to answer a court summons, the Taipei District Court issued an arrest warrant last May.
Chen Yu-hao has hidden away in the US and China, refusing to return to Taiwan to answer any summons on the grounds of illness or business-related travel. He is apparently now in Hong Kong. CTiTV aired an exclusive interview with him yesterday, thereby showing his pretext for not returning to Taiwan -- that he was not fit enough to fly back -- to be a lie.
Chen Yu-hao's propensity to tell lies is quite well known in Taiwan's financial circles. The worst example dates back to 2000, when reports about a financial crisis in the Tuntex group first arose. When Tuntex asked the government for a bail-out, the Ministry of Finance and the central bank invited more than 50 banks to help find a way for Tuntex to weather the crisis. The banks agreed to lower their interest rates and adopt other measures to reduce Tuntex's financial burden. One month after the bail-out, however, reports began to emerge that Chen Yu-hao was making massive investments in China.
As for the timing of Chen Yu-hao's letters, apart from retaliating against the government for issuing an arrest warrant, he may also be hoping to boost his chances of returning home if the pan-blue ticket wins the election. Otherwise, he has nowhere to go and can only rely on Beijing for survival. It is also possible that he is pandering to Beijing's political needs and attacking the government to show his loyalty to China -- perhaps in the hope of protecting his investments there.
No matter what Chen Yu-hao's motivation, voters and the media should think long and hard about the character of this man -- and not be willing to dance to the tune of an unscrupulous person. The Beijing regime has frequently used behind-the-scene maneuvers to attack its enemies -- in China, in Taiwan and elsewhere. If Beijing's strategy proves effective, then the destiny of the Taiwanese people could be similar to those of Hong Kong and Macau -- meat on Beijing's chopping block.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS