In his latest book, titled Believe in Taiwan -- President A-bian's Report to the People, President Chen Shui-bian (
Describing China's rise as a power in Asia as the realization of the Chinese "Monroe Doctrine," Chen says China has become a hegemonic power in Asia, generating mixed feelings among Asian nations.
The notion of the Chinese "Monroe Doctrine" has resulted in an unbalanced cross-strait relationship in at least four ways:
First, no Chinese leader dares to take the initiative to adjust Beijing's Taiwan policy for fear of being victimized in an internal power struggle. Since Deng Xiaoping (
Nevertheless, the gradual opening of Taiwan's democracy, coupled with a growing national identity in Taiwan, has widened the gap between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
The fact is, the "one country, two systems" formula is opposed by over 70 percent of Taiwanese people and does not enjoy international approval either. Conservatism, rigidity and the fear of facing reality have shaped Beijing's inflexible policy toward Taiwan.
Second, the Chinese leadership has never had the courage to recognize the consolidation and deepening of Taiwan's democracy. While Chinese leaders have repeatedly stated that their "hopes lie with the Taiwanese compatriots," the people have countered their expectations with a grand transformation of economic liberalization and political democratization -- all within a span of less than 20 years.
At a time when China has only just entered the embryonic stage of democracy characterized by local elections, people in Taiwan already enjoy the more progressive "popular sovereignty" of national referendums.
Far outpaced by Taiwan's rapid democratic progress, China has no option but to suppress Taiwan's efforts to enhance its democracy.
Third, China always lacks the courage to face the fact that there is one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait.
In addition to threatening Taiwan's international place and rooting out the nation's diplomatic allies, Beijing has on many occasions used its influence to try to prevent Taiwan's accession to the WTO and its attempts to join the World Health Organization.
Such moves not only have pushed the people of Taiwan further away from but also failed to draw Taiwan into the narrow confines of the empty "one China" framework.
The fourth element contributing to an unbalanced cross-strait relationship is the military imbalance across the Taiwan Strait. The situation causes great concern among the Asia-Pacific countries and the US.
These inherent factors that lead to an asymmetrical cross-strait relationship deserves global attention.
To help balancing current cross-strait relations, a "peaceful referendum" can be regarded as the first step to demonstrate 23 million Taiwanese people's steadfast intention to call for a peaceful transformation of its relationship with China.
With a new mandate on such a peaceful resolution on cross-strait disputes, whoever wins the March 20 presidential election in Taiwan will have full legitimacy to deal with Beijing for the sake of protecting Taiwan's interests. Pragmatic policies can be implemented based on parity and mutual benefit.
This is the essence of maintaining the status quo.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS