China's national security agencies announced Thursday that they have arrested another Taiwanese "spy." They also announced details of "spy" cases involving Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China and their addresses in Taiwan, and have invited Taiwanese journalists to interview these "Taiwanese spies."
The Chinese government has handled these spy cases in a sensationalistic way -- as Iraq did in publicizing photographs of war prisoners -- to initiate a psychological war against the Taiwanese people, and an intelligence war against Taiwan's intelligence agencies. This is a new wave of Chinese propaganda and military threats.
China has held four press conferences to announce Taiwanese espionage cases since late last year. The number of spies mentioned at these press conferences has ranged from 21 to seven, leaving us confused. Even more bizarre, the seven names publicized by Beijing Wednesday are the same as those mentioned by former New Party legislator Elmer Feng (馮滬祥) at a press conference last Friday. No wonder some say Beijing and Feng are working together.
The cross-strait situation has become very tense since former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The reports that the seven businessmen arrested by China have been prying into military matters and that Taiwan's MIB has obtained information from them may very well be false, or even the result of forced confessions.
China does not respect human rights. Any careless act by a Taiwanese businessman might be considered espionage. It is not very strange that Taiwanese officials and intelligence agencies have reacted by saying that this is all a political scheme by China aimed at helping the pan-blue camp attack President Chen Shui-bian (
Apart from the obvious political manipulation aimed at assisting the pan-blue camp's accusation that Chen's announcement of the number and location of China's ballistic missiles helped betray the identity of Taiwan's spies, there is also a behind-the-scenes cross-strait intelligence war going on. Late last year, military investigators cracked a case involving Chinese espionage in Taiwan's military intelligence system, and a network of Chinese spies in Taiwan.
There are complex motives behind China's disclosure of information about Taiwanese spies, including code names, aliases, salaries and contacts in the MIB. Laying the spy case so bare is an obvious display of force. Only the intelligence personnel on the two sides know the truth.
On one hand, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The cross-strait political standoff and confrontation do nothing to ease the tensions caused by the spy case. If Beijing really is sincere about resolving the problem, it should allow members of ARATS and Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (
Engaging in a war of words will only aggravate the situation. The best way to allay tension is to initiate dialogue and negotiations.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS