China's national security agencies announced Thursday that they have arrested another Taiwanese "spy." They also announced details of "spy" cases involving Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China and their addresses in Taiwan, and have invited Taiwanese journalists to interview these "Taiwanese spies."
The Chinese government has handled these spy cases in a sensationalistic way -- as Iraq did in publicizing photographs of war prisoners -- to initiate a psychological war against the Taiwanese people, and an intelligence war against Taiwan's intelligence agencies. This is a new wave of Chinese propaganda and military threats.
China has held four press conferences to announce Taiwanese espionage cases since late last year. The number of spies mentioned at these press conferences has ranged from 21 to seven, leaving us confused. Even more bizarre, the seven names publicized by Beijing Wednesday are the same as those mentioned by former New Party legislator Elmer Feng (馮滬祥) at a press conference last Friday. No wonder some say Beijing and Feng are working together.
The cross-strait situation has become very tense since former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The reports that the seven businessmen arrested by China have been prying into military matters and that Taiwan's MIB has obtained information from them may very well be false, or even the result of forced confessions.
China does not respect human rights. Any careless act by a Taiwanese businessman might be considered espionage. It is not very strange that Taiwanese officials and intelligence agencies have reacted by saying that this is all a political scheme by China aimed at helping the pan-blue camp attack President Chen Shui-bian (
Apart from the obvious political manipulation aimed at assisting the pan-blue camp's accusation that Chen's announcement of the number and location of China's ballistic missiles helped betray the identity of Taiwan's spies, there is also a behind-the-scenes cross-strait intelligence war going on. Late last year, military investigators cracked a case involving Chinese espionage in Taiwan's military intelligence system, and a network of Chinese spies in Taiwan.
There are complex motives behind China's disclosure of information about Taiwanese spies, including code names, aliases, salaries and contacts in the MIB. Laying the spy case so bare is an obvious display of force. Only the intelligence personnel on the two sides know the truth.
On one hand, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The cross-strait political standoff and confrontation do nothing to ease the tensions caused by the spy case. If Beijing really is sincere about resolving the problem, it should allow members of ARATS and Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (
Engaging in a war of words will only aggravate the situation. The best way to allay tension is to initiate dialogue and negotiations.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS