Deadly attacks on US forces in Iraq have so far been the work of disparate insurgents, but anger at the US-led occupation could spark broader resistance.
"It's not yet a guerrilla war," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).
"There is no central control, it's not a unified movement and the attacks are concentrated in the western part of Iraq," he said.
This partly chimes with the views of General Richard Myers, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, who said at the weekend that resistance was fragmented and restricted to a Sunni Muslim triangle from Baghdad to the north and west.
He identified five groups behind assaults that have killed 29 US soldiers since President George W. Bush declared major combat over on May 1, three weeks after former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's fall.
These were Saddam loyalists, foreign fighters from Syria and Iran, the Ansar al-Islam group said to be linked to al-Qaeda, criminals freed by Saddam before the war and Sunni extremists.
Analysts agreed the resistance was fractured, but said US officials, at least in public, were understating the growing resentment of many Iraqis at the unsubtle tactics of American troops grappling to impose control in a postwar power vacuum.
"I see this as Somalia writ large," said Jonathan Stevenson, an American counter-terrorism expert at London's International Institute for Strategic Studies.
"So far atomized groups are becoming increasingly hostile to the American occupation," he said.
Much more is at stake for the US in Iraq than in Somalia, where a US relief mission ended in disaster in 1993 after 18 US troops were killed in a firefight with militiamen.
Stevenson said the Americans were meeting a "creeping but rather strong nationalism" in Iraq, where they were failing to deliver on perceived promises to improve living conditions and hand the country back to Iraqis after 35 years of Baathist rule.
Musclebound occupation
US firepower could suppress any direct military challenge from what he described as a nascent insurgency, but this would not produce the stability the Americans sought.
"They need a political solution that vindicates the war and wins the peace. They're still groping for how to do that," he said.
Stevenson said there was no solid indication yet that al-Qaeda or other "transnational terrorists" were meddling in Iraq, but argued that the US presence there was a tempting target.
"Even if they haven't yet penetrated Iraq, they would like to do so and hook up with indigenous Islamists there," he said.
US administrator Paul Bremer has said patience is needed to rebuild a shattered country, but time is not on his side.
"If the political failure continues, along with the difficulty in providing services, the economic crisis, the problem of the Iraqi army, some sort of organized resistance movement could develop into guerrilla warfare," Alani said.
He said US troops had made serious blunders, notably in the town of Falluja, west of Baghdad, where he said anti-US attacks had begun as revenge for the killings of 15 youthful demonstrators by American forces in late April.
Alani said the Americans should have made amends in line with the Sunni town's tribal, conservative traditions by sending mediators to apologize, pay blood money and perhaps promise to build a new school in memory of the dead youngsters.
"They did nothing and they have paid a high price," he said, referring to attacks in the Falluja-Ramadi area, where he said Islamist radicals had later joined forces with vengeful townsfolk.
"You can't kill people and just walk away," he said.
Toby Dodge, an Iraq expert at Britain's Warwick University, said events in Falluja and elsewhere proved that the US military had no understanding of Iraqi society.
"I can't see how they can impose stability without it," he said.
Baath revivalists
He said that while remnants of Saddam's security services, drawn mainly from his home area of Tikrit, were behind much of the anti-US violence, non-Tikriti Baathists might also be orchestrating attacks in line with the party's ideology.
"These people believe in the Baath party's worship of a strong state, its chauvinistic nationalism directed against outsiders, and its paranoia of imperialism," Dodge said.
He said intrusive searches by British paratroopers of homes in a southern Shiite town had led to the killings of six British military police there, but there were few signs that majority Shiites were actively combating the occupation yet.
"The Shiites are playing a waiting game," he said. "But they are also arming and organizing."
The Shiites, long oppressed by Saddam's Sunni-dominated Baathists, want their share of power in the new Iraq, but for now are waiting to see what political structure emerges.
"If they don't get what they believe they deserve, we will get an intifada [uprising]," Alani predicted.
Classic counter-insurgency tactics require much more than the overwhelming force that US troops have largely relied on in efforts to crack down on Iraqi gunmen, bombers and saboteurs.
Ellie Goldsworthy, head of the UK Armed Forces program at RUSI, said it was vital to stop the 1 percent of Saddam loyalists from gaining recruits among the 99 percent of Iraqis who might be disgruntled, but not sworn foes of the Americans.
"I'm aghast at how ineptly the Americans have handled this," she said. "Some things are difficult to handle, others are cheap and easy, like smiling and talking to people with respect -- you don't wear sunglasses when you are trying to build rapport."
Goldsworthy said the US military was focused on protecting its own forces and loathe to take risks to create a more benign environment, as British forces have tried to do in the south.
"The American approach to dealing with Iraqis is very similar to the way Israelis deal with Palestinians," she said.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences