The World Health Organization (WHO) still shuts the door and hasn't sent anyone over to Taiwan to help deal with the latest epidemic. The child of an American diplomat stationed in Vietnam is possibly infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The health authorities of Taiwan immediately extended a helping hand to this American boy.
Director-General of the Department of Health Twu Shiing-jer (
As a result, Twu had to explain that when an infected person travels back to Taiwan by plane, he or she exposes the crew and passengers to the risk of infection. However, the boy in question took a chartered plane. As a consequence, risk of widespread contamination was significantly lower.
The opposition lawmakers may have sounded like they were speaking on the behalf of the ill Taiwanese businessmen, when in reality they were simply grasping at straws in yet another attempt to besmirch the government. They need to remember that on Tuesday the PFP had made a proposal for direct cross-strait charter flights for Taiwanese businessmen, so that they wouldn't have to make transit stops in Hong Kong and Macau where the epidemic is serious. The PFP proposal triggered an uproar. Everyone thought that the PFP must have gone mad over its love for China to the point where it had no regard for people's lives. China is precisely where the epidemic is most serious. No wonder some people have commented that those charter planes would have become "flights of death."
This indicates that the opposition camp is not only using the issue to take jabs at the government, but also to warm up to China. They couldn't care less about the life and death of Taiwanese businessmen. Their dearly beloved China is precisely the one standing between Taiwan and the WHO.
During an interview with CNA, American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal praised Taiwan for its exceptional and timely measures in stopping further spread of the SARS epidemic. This is worlds apart from the way China has been lying to the WHO and the world about the epidemic. Too bad most countries sit idly by and allow the barbaric China to muscle Taiwan out of the WHO. When right and wrong have been distorted by blurring the line between them in international health policy, the people of Taiwan can only pray to God for a better future. Despite paying frequent lip-service to "international justice," some world leaders seem to have no concept of what that is when it comes to Taiwan's bid to join the WHO.
Under the circumstances, the arrival of two officials from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in particularly warms one's heart and tells people who Taiwan's true friends are. The WHO openly admits that its decision to refuse any direct contact with Taiwan was made out of political considerations. The political reason to which it referred was of course Chinese pressure and the fact that Taiwan is not a WHO member.
Although the US does not have diplomatic ties with Taiwan and faces similar pressure from Beijing, it has spoken out on the behalf of Taiwan on a number of sticky issues. Based on the principal of reciprocity, it is understandable that Taiwan has accepted the American boy for medical treatment.
The opposition lawmakers' behavior has simply exposed their obsession with China and indifference to Taiwan. Unfortunately for Taiwan, value judgements are made based on ideology, even those involving life and death.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS