English teaching woes
The Taipei Times points out that the problems of English language teaching in Taiwan have to do with methodology and suggests that foreign teachers might be helpful to "train local teachers" and "compile teaching materials" ("A lot to learn about teaching English," Jan. 7, page 8).
I am very familiar with Taiwanese scholarship in foreign language teaching. I have attended the last two meetings of the English Teachers' Association of Taiwan and have read the proceedings of all meetings held since 1993. There is just as much expertise in language teaching in Taiwan as there is anywhere in the world. There is no need to bring in foreigners, often from monolingual countries that do not support bilingualism, with little knowledge of the local situation. I agree with the Taipei Times that methodology can be improved, but I suggest that the Ministry of Education first take advantage of its own experts.
Stephen Krashen
University of Southern California, CA
Your editorial made several excellent points concerning English-language education in Taiwan ("A lot to learn about teaching English," Jan. 7, page 8). You placed the blame, for example, squarely on the teaching methods and the emphasis on memorization. You also made a good suggestion as to how to use foreign teachers to train our local teachers. I would like to add a few cents of my own.
Firstly, the memorization problem is driven by our archaic notions about learning, which have been carried over from the old test-centered mandarin examination system. It really can't be effectively applied to evaluate language skills and functional competency.
Secondly, teaching methods are also driven by testing requirements, which are by and large a static approach to language acquisition.
Thirdly, we really need to change this teaching approach from static to dynamic. By dynamic, I mean that we need to learn to use the language instead of studying it solely to pass tests.
To be able to use the language we need to learn to speak the language first. From my own teaching experience, I disagree with your view that English-language acquisition can't be achieved through English without the aid of explanations in another language. As a matter of fact, we all learned our mother tongue through our mother tongue. It is the method that counts. (Using real objects in live situations initially will resolve the problem of guesswork, as you contended.)
Yes, if our teaching methods and preoccupation with testing remain unchanged, what would be the point of hiring foreign teachers at a high salary? It might be a waste of time and would deplete our national treasury which is not so full at this point in time.
Chang Yen-chung
Taoyuan, Taoyuan County
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
RSS