It's a hot, humid Sunday morning in northern India, but the oppressive heat does not deter a group of about 15 farmers from trudging door-to-door, offering advice and sometimes warnings.
"Do not sell your precious land. Even if you are offered millions of dollars, do not sell. It is your only source of livelihood," Mahavir Gulia, the leader of the group, tells a villager in Mundha Khera, 100km from New Delhi.
"Sell your land and you will lose your identity," he warns another as the group winds its way through the cluster of austere mud, brick and cement homes.
PHOTO: AFP
Gulia is trying to spell out the dangers to locals whose land has been earmarked for a Chinese-style business enclave -- a joint venture between the Haryana state government and Reliance Industries, India's largest private conglomerate.
"We want to be sure our fertile land that gives us three crops a year does not end up as part of the Reliance empire," he said. "We don't want Reliance to colonize us. Land is what sustains us farmers with food, respect and dignity."
In Neemana village, 10km away, Pratap Singh, 75, understands the message -- but a little too late.
Eight months ago, he was the owner of an 8 hectare fertile field that yielded three harvests a year.
"My sons were lured by the promise of good and quick money. They persuaded me to sell most of my land to the big company," Singh said, squatting on the sandy floor of the one-room house that he and his wife share with a buffalo.
He did get some cash, but it did not last him long in the world outside his usual farming routine.
"We have a saying here that our land is our mother," Singh said sadly. "How can you get any respect when you have sold your mother?"
Singh's land is now part of the 10,120 hectare Reliance-Haryana government Special Economic Zone (SEZ) -- a project encouraged by the Indian government to spur industrialization, infrastructure development and push economic growth into double digits.
For foreign and domestic corporate giants, the SEZs are a tempting option -- promising a way around the country's notoriously slow, spirit-crushing and often bureaucracy.
But opponents say the government is merely sidelining the still-crucial farm sector -- stealing labor and prime land from a sector that employs more than 60 percent of the workforce and generates more than a fifth of India's GDP.
Journalist-turned-activist Praful Bidwai said that last year and this year "will be noted in history for the launch of the Great Land Grab."
"It's happening across India," social activist Vandana Shiva said, pointing to farmers' protests in the Communist-ruled eastern West Bengal State in March.
Fourteen farmers were killed when police entered their village to evict them from land designated for a SEZ -- causing a furore and polarizing public opinion.
Not that land grabbing is a new concept in India -- tribal peoples have long seen their forest land shrink with the march of urbanization.
But SEZs are different, Shiva said.
"These are enclaves of privilege, insulated from the laws of the land -- whether it is labor laws or environment laws."
So far, India has approved 303 SEZs and set aside 1,400km2 of land on which they are to be built.
The Indian trade ministry said that the 126 enclaves already operating have generated 32,578 jobs and that this would swell to 1.5 million by December 2009. It also hopes SEZs will generate US$25 billion worth of exports next year and in 2009.
While the figures look impressive, critics argue that Indian democracy is suffering.
"When there is large scale displacement of people involved, you need their consent. In a democracy, people have the right to decide their own future," prominent community activist Aruna Roy said.
Economist Paranajoy Guha Thakurta said India's ambition to emulate the Chinese SEZ model is basically flawed -- "because India is a democracy."
"The Chinese SEZs are like giant urban agglomerations, independent nation-states with their own rules for labor and environment," he said.
India following the same model will only create "huge islands of industrial affluence in a sea of deprivation and poverty.
"This will be unacceptable in a democracy," he said.
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to