Lynn Gaines is the office worker's answer to Martha Stewart.
In her 18 years as a designer and illustrator at American Greetings Corp in Cleveland, her cubicle has undergone several renovations: For a few years it was a garden, complete with an arch of fake ivy, pink silk roses and sparkly little lights. Last month she went retro, festooning the arch with rainbow-color fringe and light-reflecting colored plastic disks.
"It's an extension of who you are," Gaines said of her work space.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
Her company, she said, advocates office personalizing for its 2,200 employees -- who include designers of greeting cards, gift wrapping and party favors -- to encourage creativity and increase productivity.
But American Greetings is apparently in the minority. A national telephone survey of 640 white-collar workers -- conducted by Steelcase, the office furniture maker, and Opinion Research and released in August -- found that only 40 percent of companies encourage employees to personalize their work space. That number fell from 56 percent a decade earlier.
Office workers are taking the hint: Only 59 percent said they personalize their work space, compared with 85 percent who did so in 1996.
Employees said they didn't want to bother co-workers with whom they share office space, didn't have enough space or a permanent space or wanted to avoid seeming unprofessional.
Sometimes, it isn't their choice. The Hearst Corp, the media giant that owns Cosmopolitan, Harper's Bazaar and Country Living, among other magazines, limits personal knickknacks and vacation photos in the shiny new Hearst Tower designed by Norman Foster in New York.
The policy, which was e-mailed to the 2,000 employees who relocated to the tower and has been posted on the company Intranet, specifies limiting "the amount of personal items, stacks of paper and other materials" kept in the blond-wood and gray-metal work spaces and bans carrying in "furniture or lighting without prior approval."
David Masello, the articles editor at Country Living, says his small new cubicle has less room for "things that give me comfort and inspiration."
"It's things like pictures, postcards and paintings," he said. "In my old office, I had a wall of them. Now, I have one-tenth of that."
At Calvin Klein, the company's minimalist aesthetic trumps employee style. In July 2004 executives decreed there could be no desktop displays of photographs, mementos, toys, awards, plants or flowers, other than white ones.
An e-mail directive sent to employees included, as a guide to decorating, a photograph of a black desk with a small number of appropriate, mostly black accouterments.
Malcolm Carfrae, the company's senior vice president for global communications, declined to confirm whether the policy was still in effect.
Written company directives about office decorating are unusual, said William Casey, a management consultant in Golden, Colorado.
"It's difficult to write clear policies on this issue without coming off as a bureaucratic nut," he said.
"The general rule is your self-expression ends at the point that you disrupt work," said Casey, the president of Executive Leadership Group.
"You can hardly write a policy that says, `Don't put up cartoons,'" said Wendi Peck, the chief executive of the company.
They had a client with an employee who plastered his cubicle with Dilbert cartoons.
The collage created such a "negative and depressing" atmosphere, Peck recalled, that the supervisor ordered them removed, though there was no ban.
Even personal photographs can be anathema. After her second child was born, Kelly Welter, who worked for a large accounting firm in Salem, Oregon, had to jettison her older child's baby picture in favor of an image of the children together, because her employer allowed only one personal picture to a desk.
"I was told that the office had to be extremely professional because clients came in," Welter, 34, said.
In a study, Jeffrey Sanchez-Burks, an assistant professor of management and organizations in the business school at the University of Michigan, found that once personal items exceeded 20 percent of a work space, managers began to question a worker's professionalism,
Sanchez-Burks said he had concluded from studies of the US workplace that there is an unwritten rule that workers separate their personal and work lives.
An antiseptic space, though, can sometimes raise employer suspicions.
"In a Denver insurance company, one exec did nothing to personalize his space at all," said Casey, who is also an organizational psychologist.
"It was completely sterile. His boss worried that he wasn't planning on staying," he said.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should