When Marco Lachmann-Anke and his wife, Peggy, learned in January that hackers cracked a 40-character password and cleaned out their cryptocurrency wallet, they did not go to the police or alert the tokens’ issuer, the Berlin-based technology group IOTA.
They bought more coins.
The Cyprus-based German couple, who describe themselves as financial educators, figured they had no chance of recovering the coins and it was not even clear who might take up their case.
Yet they took the nearly US$14,000 loss in stride — something that comes with the territory when one bets on a new, exciting technology in a yet-unregulated market.
“We really believe in cryptocurrencies. We have studied this for about a year before investing, so we are aware of the risks,” Peggy Lachmann-Anke said. “There was nothing we could do.”
Far from unusual, the episode is emblematic for a market where few rules apply and where investors’ faith in the blockchain technology goes hand in hand with the belief that it also helps criminals cover their tracks so well that trying to catch them is a fool’s errand.
Patrick Wyman, an FBI supervisory special agent at the financial crimes section of the agency’s anti-money laundering unit, acknowledged that cryptocurrencies pose some unique challenges.
“A decentralized currency system like bitcoin, or another form of virtual currency, is not governed by any entity, suspicious reporting activity, and any anti-money laundering compliance,” Wyman said.
Various estimates have shown that cryptocurrency crime is on the rise, keeping pace with the market’s rapid growth.
That forces investigators to focus on high-profile cases, security professionals and officials said, effectively leaving small investors to their own devices.
“We do not pretend that every law enforcement agency is devoting resources to every single crime. That would not be possible,” said Jaroslav Jakubcek, an analyst at Europol, which serves as a center for the EU’s law enforcement cooperation, expertise and intelligence.
Officials still encourage people to report cryptocurrency theft to local police like any other crime, saying failing to do so only emboldens criminals.
However, because many victims simply do not see the point, cryptocurrency theft is far more common than any published estimates suggest, security professionals said.
According to financial research firm Autonomous Next and Crypto Aware, which works with investors affected by cryptoscams, about 15 percent of cryptocurrencies have been stolen between 2012 and the first half of this year, representing a cumulative US$1.7 billion in value at the time of the theft, and with a rising tendency.
In the first half of this year alone, more than US$800 million has been stolen, the data showed.
Yet Lex Sokolin, a partner and global director of fintech strategy at the firm, estimated that as much as 85 percent of crimes go unreported and said the published statistics only represent publicly reported heists.
Interviews with half a dozen victims painted a similar picture. Out of that group only two reported their losses to the authorities and one soured on cryptocurrency investments.
Armin Fischer, a Vienna-based IT specialist said that he lost about US$5,300 in ether coins in a phishing scam in the summer of last year and immediately alerted the local police just to find out that the duty officer had no idea what he was talking about.
He said it took many months of knocking on doors to get his case ultimately taken up by Vienna prosecutors’ office, but it is still pending.
Fisher said by now he has had enough.
“I have seen firsthand how big the security leaks are,” he said.
Others are more philosophical.
Dave Appleton, a blockchain developer for HelloGold Sdn Bhd, a gold-trading app company in Kuala Lumpur, said he lost about US$3,000 of ether coins when scammed by a fake site touting a start-up’s token presale.
He said he just moved on, glad he did not lose more.
“The point is there’s no one to report the crime to,” Appleton said. “I am not sure what country or jurisdiction it would come under.”
According initial coin offering (ICO) tracker Coinschedule Ltd, a record US$21.3 billion flowed into new tokens so far this year as investors keep snapping up ICOs, undeterred by high-profile heists, bitcoin’s and other cryptocurrencies’ slide from late last year’s peaks, and government warnings of widespread fraud and theft.
David Jevans, chief executive of cybersecurity firm CipherTrace Inc in Menlo Park, California, estimated that even when exchanges or trading platforms get hacked, perhaps only one-fifth of stolen coins is recovered because of the ease with which digital tokens can move across several borders.
“You have to get law enforcement in five countries interested enough, have time enough, and have evidence enough to open a case,” he said. “By the time they agree, get the information, do all the paperwork, the money has been moved.”
In most cases millions need to be at stake to justify such an effort, security experts said.
US entrepreneur and long-time cryptocurrency investor Michael Terpin, who said he got robbed twice, learned firsthand that not all hacks are created equal.
He said first time when criminals accessed his cellphone with stolen SIM card credentials, emptied a wallet connected to it and tricked his friends into sending money by impersonating him on Skype, he contacted a friend at the FBI.
However, once she learned that only US$60,000 got stolen, she advised him to file a report via the FBI’s Internet crime center Web site.
Terpin said he did, but never heard back.
Then, when in January last year he lost almost US$24 million in tokens from his mobile account, he went straight after the service provider AT&T Inc, filing a US$224 million lawsuit accusing it of negligence that allowed “digital identity theft,” a claim AT&T denies.
Undeterred, Terpin said he remains committed to blockchain, comparing it to the early days of Amazon.com Inc when the online retailer faced much skepticism and even derision.
“That’s similar to today’s narrative that all ICOs are scams and nothing will ever be developed of value because they’re not already fully deployed,” he said.
Steadfast commitment to the new technology and belief that it gives sophisticated criminals the upper hand mean that even some multimillion heists go unreported.
For example, when hackers in July last year stole about US$9 million worth of ether tokens from the Zug, Switzerland-based company Swarm City, the peer-to-peer digital platform did not report the theft to the police, business leader Bernd Lapp said.
“It’s impossible to track and return the funds. We live and die with this technology,” Lapp said.
Poland is betting on a flood of investments and technology transfers from Taiwanese companies to reengineer its US$1 trillion economy. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said yesterday that Poland will no longer be “just an assembly hub” as it pursues further investments from the likes of Foxconn Technology Group (富士康). The firm, whose full name is Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), last month agreed to build electric vehicles (EVs) in the European Union nation and now could be a partner in a semiconductor venture, he said. The government’s aim is to boost manufacturing and the country’s high-tech chops in an era
Taiwan remained the sixth-largest net creditor nation in the world last year, despite a fall of more than 10 percent in its net international investment position (NIIP) over the year, the central bank said yesterday. The NIIP is the difference between a country’s external financial assets and its external financial liabilities. Taiwan’s external financial assets hit US$3.27 trillion at the end of last year, up US$275.75 billion or 9.2 percent from a year earlier, the central bank said in its annual NIIP report. The growth largely reflected an increase in holdings of overseas marketable securities by residents in Taiwan, as well as a
RESTRICTION BREACH: ASML said that it denies ‘unfounded rumors regarding non-compliance with export controls concerning China,’ and enforces controls strictly US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in a series of recent meetings outlined concerns to Dutch chip-equipment giant ASML Holding NV’s senior leaders that one of its top-of-the-line machines might have made its way into China, in violation of US-led export restrictions. In the meetings, Lutnick expressed concern to ASML executives over the company’s extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines, people familiar with the talks said. EUV systems are used by firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) to manufacture processors for the likes of Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc. ASML has never been allowed to ship them to China because of curbs
BAD FAITH LITIGATION? The two companies, owned by a California-based private equity firm, could be seeking licensing fees or a settlement payout with the suit Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) Director-General Liao Cheng-wei (廖承威) said yesterday he suspected that two firms suing contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) for patent infringement are “patent trolls.” A patent troll refers to a company that buys patents not for manufacturing products, but to sue other companies for compensation, accusing them of using its patents. Patent trolls, formally called Non-Practicing Entities or Patent Assertion Entities, were responsible for more than 50 percent of lawsuits in the US last year, costing targeted businesses tens of billions of US dollars a year, according to the US-based LegalCharity Web site. Asked whether
RSS