The magnitude of the slump in the first quarter showed that the nation is in a deeper recession than the market expected, prompting economic officials to suggest sizing up the economy on a quarterly basis rather than on a year-on-year basis.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) announced on Thursday that the economy contracted by an unprecedented 10.24 percent between January and March from the same period last year.
The dismal showing led the statistics agency to revise the GDP forecast for this year to a decline of 4.25 percent from a 2.97 percent contraction predicted in February.
Council for Economic Planning and Development Chairman Chen Tain-jy (陳添枝) told a press conference later on Thursday that GDP dipped 0.37 percent based on a quarterly annualized formula, and would show improvement for the rest of the year.
Chen said the formula, which has been instituted in the US, Japan and Singapore, could better capture economic trends.
GDP shrank by 3.84 percent in the third quarter of last year from a 4.56 percent expansion a quarter earlier, indicating a severe downturn, Chen said.
The DGBAS has promised to compute economic data using both formulas starting in November, when third-quarter figures will be published.
Wu Ming-huei (吳明蕙), a CEPD section chief responsible for tracking business cycles, said the council has long adopted the annualized formula to monitor economic indicators.
“The quarterly annualized rate can better detect shifts in business cycles,” Wu said by telephone on Friday. “It is also a better tool to monitor the recession.”
Gauged quarter-on-quarter, GDP growth is likely to turn positive this quarter as the slump has slackened.
DGBAS predicted the contraction would persist but slow to 8.5 percent and 2.98 percent in the second and third quarters respectively, and reverse to a 5.2 percent growth in the fourth quarter, when compared with the same period last year.
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
Taiwan has enough crude oil reserves for more than 100 days and sufficient natural gas reserves for more than 11 days, both above the regulatory safety requirement, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday, adding that the government would prioritize domestic price stability as conflicts in the Middle East continue. Overall, energy supply for this month is secure, and the government is continuing efforts to ensure sufficient supply for next month, Kung told reporters after meeting with representatives from business groups at the ministry in Taipei. The ministry has been holding daily cross-ministry meetings at the Executive Yuan to ensure
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI
A new worry has been rippling across the stock market lately: Entire businesses, not just their employees, might be thrown out of work. While most economists say fears of an artificial intelligence (AI) job apocalypse are overblown, seismic shifts have happened in the past after big tech breakthroughs. The IT revolution of the 1990s led to a surge in productivity that sped up the US economy for several years. It also rendered companies or even industries largely redundant — from travel agents and stockbrokers to classified advertising and newspapers, or video rental stores. Economists expect AI would deliver higher productivity,