For many in Asia, the brief spate of market turmoil this week following Thailand's decision to defend its currency by setting limits on foreign investments was eerily familiar.
Nearly a decade ago, a crisis over the Thai baht dragged much of region into recession.
But for now, there seems little likelihood of an Asia-wide financial crisis similar to that triggered by a plunge in the baht in July 1997. Nearly a decade on, regional banks and economies are far more robust and better managed than back then.
PHOTO: AFP
"The risk levels for the two periods are incomparable," says economist Somchai Jitsuchon at the Thailand Development Research Institute, an independent think-tank.
In the go-go 1990s, many Asian countries were carrying huge overhangs of foreign debt. Crony capitalism trumped risk management at many regional financial institutions.
"There will be more problems, but it will not be like the crisis in 1997," said Sompop Manarangsan, an economist at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.
"[Back in the late 1990s] we had over-investment, over-consumption and over-borrowing and the macro-indicators were bad," he said.
Thailand, for example, had big trade and current account deficits. But now, the country runs a robust trade surplus and has nearly US$65 billion in foreign currency reserves, far more than it did in 1997.
Back then, the baht plunged in value, kindling speculative pressures that forced other nations in the region to allow their currencies to fall as well, making it difficult to repay dollar-denominated debts.
But this time, Thai authorities acted because the baht was judged to be too strong. Before Monday, it had gained 13 percent against the dollar this year, the most of any regional currency.
And although Thai manufacturers gripe about the strong baht, which makes their products more expensive overseas, exports are up about 20 percent this year.
In South Korea, the 1997 crisis hit hard -- but it also forced the country to reform its heavily indebted family-owned conglomerates, streamline its banking sector and improve the transparency of its corporations.
Indonesia, bankrupted and propelled into political upheaval by the crisis, now has foreign reserves worth US$42 billion. It plans to repay what it owes the IMF for a multibillion-dollar bailout ahead of schedule.
Still, Asia's rapid economic growth makes it a magnet for inflows of capital seeking high returns -- and that can become problematic.
For one, it's lifted Asian currencies like the Korean won, Thai baht, Philippine peso and Indonesian rupiah against the US dollar, hurting exporters.
It also makes those nations vulnerable to speculative pressures given the huge amount of money chasing investments in emerging markets, driving up stock and property prices as well as regional currencies.
"The problem is that financial markets have become so big and a currency like the Thai baht is so small the market can put it anywhere it wants to," says Andy Xie (
"A small country has a huge problem now," Xie says.
In the weeks leading up to Monday's announcement of foreign investment controls aimed at fending off the inflow of money, Thailand's central bank governor Tarisa Watanagase complained that broad dollar weakness was the key problem.
Others point to China's refusal to let its own currency, the yuan, appreciate faster against the US dollar.
The yuan has gained just 3.6 percent against the dollar since its revaluation in July last year.
Another factor is the so-called "carry trade," which involves heavy yen-denominated borrowing, thanks to Japan's low 0.25 percent interest rate, for investments in higher-yielding countries like Thailand, where the benchmark interest rate is 5 percent.
"Investors just jumped on that as easy money on the table," says Jonathan Anderson, chief Asia economist for the UBS brokerage in Hong Kong.
The conditions made it "very easy and attractive to speculate on the currency, so you get a virtuous or vicious circle, depending on whether you're an investor or a policy maker," he says.
Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves fell below the US$600 billion mark at the end of last month, with the central bank reporting a total of US$596.89 billion — a decline of US$8.6 billion from February — ending a three-month streak of increases. The central bank attributed the drop to a combination of factors such as outflows by foreign institutional investors, currency fluctuations and its own market interventions. “The large-scale outflows disrupted the balance of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market, prompting the central bank to intervene repeatedly by selling US dollars to stabilize the local currency,” Department of Foreign
ENERGY ISSUES: The TSIA urged the government to increase natural gas and helium reserves to reduce the impact of the Middle East war on semiconductor supply stability Chip testing and packaging service provider ASE Technology Holding Co (日月光投控) yesterday said it planned to invest more than NT$100 billion (US$3.15 billion) in building a new advanced chip testing facility in Kaohsiung to keep up with customer demand driven by the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. That would be included in the company’s capital expenditure budget next year, ASE said. There is also room to raise this year’s capital spending budget from a record-high US$7 billion estimated three months ago, it added. ASE would have six factories under construction this year, another record-breaking number, ASE chief operating officer Tien Wu
For weeks now, the global tech industry has been waiting for a major artificial intelligence (AI) launch from DeepSeek (深度求索), seen as a benchmark for China’s progress in the fast-moving field. More than a year has passed since the start-up put Chinese AI on the map in early last year with a low-cost chatbot that performed at a similar level to US rivals. However, despite reports and rumors about its imminent release, DeepSeek’s next-generation “V4” model is nowhere in sight. Speculation is also swirling over the geopolitical implications of which computer chips were chosen to train and power the new
The EU and US are nearing an agreement to coordinate on producing and securing critical minerals, part of a push to break reliance on Chinese supplies. The potential deal would create incentives, such as minimum prices, that could advantage non-Chinese suppliers, according to a draft of an “action plan” seen by Bloomberg. The EU and US would also cooperate on standards, investments and joint projects, as well as coordinate on any supply disruptions by countries like China. The two sides are additionally seeking other “like-minded partners” to join a multicountry accord to help create these new critical mineral supply chains, which feed into