Sun, Mar 15, 2026 page9

• Canada preparing for arctic defense, with or without the US

  Icebreakers in the yards and upgrades at facilities in the far north are just part of a multi-billion dollar effort as the arctic becomes a hotter target

  • By Nav Rahi / AFP, NORTH VANCOUVER, Canada
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  At a massive shipyard in North Vancouver, Canadian workers grind metal beams for a powerful new icebreaker crucial to cementing the country’s presence in the increasingly contested arctic.

  Icebreakers are specialized, expensive vessels able to navigate in the frozen far north.

  And “this is the crown jewel,” said Eddie Schehr, vice president of production at the Seaspan shipyard.

  

  A worker welds the parts of a polar icebreaker under construction at Seaspan Shipyards in North Vancouver, British Columbia, on Feb. 13, 2026. Canada`s new Polar Icebreaker is designed to operate in the harshest arctic conditions, equipped for search-and-rescue, scientific exploration and intelligence gathering in a region fast becoming a strategic priority. But experts say the vessel also sends a clear message that Canada is reinforcing its position in the arctic, where ice thaw caused by climate change is opening a new era of geopolitical competition.

  Photo: AFP

  For Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who heads to Norway next Friday to observe arctic defense drills involving troops from 14 NATO states, Canada’s extreme north has emerged as a strategic priority.

  “Canada is and forever will be an Arctic nation,” he said ahead of the trip. During a stop in Canada’s Northwest Territories before flying to Norway, Carney announced nearly C$35 billion (US$25.3 billion) in arctic funding, with most of the funds dedicated to upgrading military infrastructure. “We cannot rely on other nations for our security,” he said. “We are securing every corner of this terrain.”

  Concerns about Russian aggression, especially after the invasion of Ukraine, have focused attention on the arctic, where territorial sovereignty is disputed in several areas.

  Climate change is intensifying competition, with previously inaccessible minerals increasingly available for exploitation as the ice thaws and new shipping routes open.

  For Wesley Wark, a national security expert at the Center for International Governance Innovation, icebreaker fleets are a key part of the defense innovation required to safeguard Canada’s position.

  “We’re in the business of trying to reassert ourselves as an icebreaking superpower,” Wark said.

  Two new ships are under construction, each costing more than C$3 billion. One is being partly built in Finland, due for delivery in 2030. The other ship, set to be ready in 2032, is being built at the Seaspan shipyards in North Vancouver.

  Senior vice president Dave Hargreaves said Canada’s icebreaking fleet is “getting old.”

  And this ship, he said, “gives Canada the ability to have a strong presence in the Arctic, which is where you start.”

  Canada’s decision to upgrade its icebreaker fleet preceded US President Donald Trump’s return to office.

  Carney has delivered stark warnings about new risks from the US since entering Canadian politics last year, including a claim from last year’s federal election campaign that Trump wanted to “break us so America can own us.”

  Wark said that Canada’s challenge in the Arctic has two main planks. First, Carney’s government wants “to show that it’s a strong NATO partner and to take part in NATO collective

  security,” he said, adding that NATO is “deeply concerned about Russian activities in the Arctic.” Russia has the world’s largest icebreaker fleet by far — Canada is a distant second — and Wark said Carney wants to signal to a domestic audience and allies that Canada can defend NATO’s “Arctic flank.”

  HARD POWER CAPACITY

  Canada must consider that “the US itself potentially represents a danger to Canadian security,” Wark said. Trump has discussed annexing Canada at various points in his second term. He again mocked Carney as the “governor” of a US state this week, renewing a taunt he first levelled at former prime minister Justin Trudeau. Wark maintains the chance of direct military confrontation with the US is low.

  The more immediate risk is that Washington might conclude Canada is incapable of defending the Arctic, compelling the US military to take charge, he said.

  “I think Canadian officials have come to understand that the US administration, Trump, people around Trump in positions of power and influence, do not hold Canada in high regard as a country... essentially arguing Canada has no military,” he said.

  For Canada, “the incentive to increase its hard power capacity is partly driven by those US concerns,” Wark said, while stressing that, “whatever the Trump administration might say, Canada is not a military freeloader.”

  Unlike Russia, Canada has no intention of arming its icebreakers.

  The ships are designed to operate in the harshest Arctic conditions, equipped for intelligence gathering, search-and-rescue as well as scientific exploration.

  The Seaspan ship “can go anywhere in the Canadian Arctic any time of the year, which is a very difficult requirement to meet,” Hargreaves said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    West Ham beat Brentford on penalties to advance

  • 2

    Yamal bends Barcelona past Athletic Bilbao

  • 3

    US’ reprieve will not matter due to lack of intensity

  • 4

    Taiwan’s largest snake fossil, at 4m, found in Tainan

  • 5

    Taiwan’s largest snake fossil found in Tainan