The Royal Dutch/Shell Group's former chairman, Sir Philip Watts, received a severance package worth £1.06 million (US$1.93 million), the amount he would have earned had he stayed on until retirement, the company said on Friday.
Watts was asked to step down in March, after an internal investigation found that the company had overstated its oil and gas reserves estimates for several years.
He was the head of exploration and production, the division in charge of reserves, from 1997 to 2000, when much of the overbooking occurred.
Watts, who turned 59 on Friday, had been scheduled to retire in June next year.
Shell said Friday that Watts received the payment, rather than three months of salary, a more standard severance agreement in Britain, because he resigned from his post by mutual agreement with Shell's board rather than being forced out.
The severance package is in addition to a pension of £584,000 (US$1.06 million) a year.
Last year, he was awarded 1.165 million stock options, worth £582,500 if they were exercised at Friday's closing price, and a salary of £843,000 (US$1.5 million).
Some investor groups said the severance payment was a clear sign that shareholder rights were still too weak.
"We think that shareholders need the power to specifically approve or reject these termination packages," said David Somerlinck, corporate governance policy manager at Pensions Investment Research Consultants, a London firm that represents institutional shareholders.
Last year, the British government weighed legislation that would give investors the power to vote down rich severance packages, but the bill was not approved.
Shell should have awarded Watts three months of pay, the minimum allowed under his contract, Somerlinck said.
Shell is facing several class-action lawsuits and investigations related to its reserves estimates that could cut into earnings this year or next.
Regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the US Department of Justice in particular, may impose hefty fines, analysts say.
The company first cut its proven reserve estimates by 20 percent in January, then trimmed them three more times.
Tomorrow, Shell's directors and managers will face shareholders for the first time at two separate annual general meetings in London and Amsterdam.
Attendance is expected to be high, and small shareholders in particular are likely to use the forum to criticize Shell's corporate governance.
In response to an investor outcry after the reserve estimates were cut in January, Shell has agreed to rethink its unique dual-board structure.
Investors are anxious to be part of any revamping of the company.
Some investor groups have already put forward specific proposals about the issue that may be addressed at Monday's meetings.
The California Public Employees' Retirement System, or Calpers, and Knight Vinke Asset Management will ask Shell to include two outside investor representatives in their review process.
"We're not looking for confrontation for confrontation's sake," said Lucy Butler, a spokeswoman for the Association of British Insurers.
The group would just like to make sure that Shell is communicating with shareholders about any changes, she added.
Shell also said on Friday that the expiration date for 2,847,000 stock options Watts has outstanding had been moved up. The last of the options now expire in March 2009, rather than March 2013.
The government yesterday approved applications by Alphabet Inc’s Google to invest NT$27.08 billion (US$859.98 million) in Taiwan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said in a statement. The Department of Investment Review approved two investments proposed by Google, with much of the funds to be used for data processing and electronic information supply services, as well as inventory procurement businesses in the semiconductor field, the ministry said. It marks the second consecutive year that Google has applied to increase its investment in Taiwan. Google plans to infuse NT$25.34 billion into Charter Investments Ltd (特許投資顧問) through its Singapore-based subsidiary Fructan Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd, and
Micron Technology Inc is a driving force pushing the US Congress to pass legislation that would put new export restrictions on equipment its Chinese competitors use to make their chips, according to people familiar with the matter. A US House of Representatives panel yesterday was to vote on the “MATCH Act,” a bill designed to close gaps in restrictions on chipmaking equipment. It would also pressure foreign companies that sell equipment to Chinese chipmaking facilities to align with export curbs on US companies like Lam Research Corp and Applied Materials Inc. The bill targets facilities operated by China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings’ planned acquisition of Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations has yet to enter the formal review stage, as regulators await supplementary documents, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said yesterday. Acting FTC Chairman Chen Chih-min (陳志民) told the legislature’s Economics Committee that although Grab submitted its application on March 27, the case has not been officially accepted because required materials remain incomplete. Once the filing is finalized, the FTC would launch a formal probe into the deal, focusing on issues such as cross-shareholding and potential restrictions on market competition, Chen told lawmakers. Grab last month announced that it would acquire
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new