A decision in the legal case against a 22-year-old man surnamed Chung who shared music files over the Internet without the permission of record labels was hailed by the music industry yesterday as a landmark in the fight against online piracy.
"This case proves that peer-to-peer file-sharing infringes copyright," International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) Taiwan branch secretary-general Robin Lee (
The music industry has claimed since 2000 that peer-to-peer Web sites break the law as they allow subscribers to download music via the Internet without paying royalty fees to the rights holder.
After successfully closing only one Web site -- Napster -- the industry changed tack earlier this year and started going after site users.
"We will use this case to let everybody know that users of peer-to-peer Web sites are breaking the law, and we will bring more cases to court if peer-to-peer doesn't stop," Lee said.
In Taiwan, the IFPI -- which represents 12 local and international record companies -- launched three cases against individuals, and two against the peer-to-peer Web sites Ezpeer.com.tw and kuro.com.tw (Kuro,
The decision against Chung is the first result in the court cases. Last week, the prosecutors office of the Panchiao District Court decided to defer prosecution in the case against Ezpeer subscriber Chung after he admitted that he infringed the copyright law and agreed to publish an apology in the local press. The apology appeared last Friday.
Chung also signed agreements that he would not use peer-to-peer Web sites again, or share music files without the prior permission of rights holders. Under the deferred prosecution framework, Chung could be dragged back in front of the courts if he breaks the agreement and starts sharing files again.
One legal expert said the decision was important, but not final.
"This represents some kind of victory for the music industry," said Liu Yen-ling (
The news comes as Taiwan's music industry struggles to survive. Taiwan's legitimate market in recorded music has dropped dramatically in value from NT$12 billion in 1997 to NT$4.9 billion last year, according to IFPI figures.
Meanwhile, peer-to-peer sites are raking in the cash. Kuro charges its 500,000 users NT$99 per month, netting the company NT$600 million per year. Ezpeer charges NT$100 per month with 300,000 members, which means NT$360 million per year.
Officials from Ezpeer and Kuro were not available for comment yesterday afternoon, but both have repeatedly claimed that their services are legal as they do not store songs on their servers, or charge subscribers to download music.
Consumers in Taiwan can buy music over the Internet without fear of prosecution. Earlier this month, iBIZ Entertainment Technology Corp (
Chunghwa Telecom Co's (
"If you go the legal way, the record industry will support you," he said yesterday.
The government yesterday approved applications by Alphabet Inc’s Google to invest NT$27.08 billion (US$859.98 million) in Taiwan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said in a statement. The Department of Investment Review approved two investments proposed by Google, with much of the funds to be used for data processing and electronic information supply services, as well as inventory procurement businesses in the semiconductor field, the ministry said. It marks the second consecutive year that Google has applied to increase its investment in Taiwan. Google plans to infuse NT$25.34 billion into Charter Investments Ltd (特許投資顧問) through its Singapore-based subsidiary Fructan Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd, and
Micron Technology Inc is a driving force pushing the US Congress to pass legislation that would put new export restrictions on equipment its Chinese competitors use to make their chips, according to people familiar with the matter. A US House of Representatives panel yesterday was to vote on the “MATCH Act,” a bill designed to close gaps in restrictions on chipmaking equipment. It would also pressure foreign companies that sell equipment to Chinese chipmaking facilities to align with export curbs on US companies like Lam Research Corp and Applied Materials Inc. The bill targets facilities operated by China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings’ planned acquisition of Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations has yet to enter the formal review stage, as regulators await supplementary documents, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said yesterday. Acting FTC Chairman Chen Chih-min (陳志民) told the legislature’s Economics Committee that although Grab submitted its application on March 27, the case has not been officially accepted because required materials remain incomplete. Once the filing is finalized, the FTC would launch a formal probe into the deal, focusing on issues such as cross-shareholding and potential restrictions on market competition, Chen told lawmakers. Grab last month announced that it would acquire
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new
RSS