Israel’s sweeping campaign of airstrikes aims to do more than destroy Iran’s nuclear centrifuges and missile capabilities. It seeks to shatter the foundations of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s government and leave it near collapse, Israeli, Western and regional officials said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants Iran weakened enough to be forced into fundamental concessions on permanently abandoning its nuclear enrichment, its ballistic missile program and its support for militant groups across the region, the sources said.
He also wants to leave Khamenei’s government debilitated. The campaign is about “exhausting the regime’s ability to project power and maintain internal cohesion,” one senior regional official said.
Photo: AP
Iran’s Islamic government faces an existential crisis unlike anything since the 1979 Revolution — not even the brutal 1980 to 1988 Iran-Iraq war posed such a direct threat to clerical rule. Israel, the Middle East’s most advanced military, can strike anywhere in Iran with drones and advanced F-35 fighter jets, assassinations by Mossad operatives, and cyberwarfare technology.
In recent days, Israel has broadened its targets to include government institutions such as the police and state television headquarters in Tehran. Netanyahu’s government is planning for at least two weeks of intense airstrikes, although the pace depends on how long it takes to eliminate Iran’s missile stockpiles and launch capacity, four government and diplomatic sources said.
Dennis Ross, a former Middle East envoy and advisor to several US administrations, said Iran is feeling the pressure and might be inching toward the negotiating table after the strikes eliminated much of Khamenei’s inner circle, damaged nuclear infrastructure and missile sites, and killed top security figures.
Photo: AP
Despite US President Donald Trump’s belligerent tone in recent days, he would likely accept if Tehran offered a credible path to a deal, Ross said.
However, after Tehran offered no concessions during six previous rounds of nuclear negotiations with the US, Washington would need firm assurances from Iran that its goals, including the permanent abandonment of enrichment, would be met before it would support a ceasefire, he said.
“I think the cost to them is going to be high,” he added.
Photo: Reuters
For Iran, there is one key calculation: letting the 86-year-old Khamenei retreat without humiliation, two Iranian sources said. Strip him of dignity or the prospect of survival, and he might choose all-out conflict, they added.
After Trump demanded Iran’s “unconditional surrender” on social media on Tuesday, Khamenei promised in a televised speech that any US military intervention in Iran would be met with “irreparable damage.”
In recent days, Netanyahu has also overtly raised the prospect of regime change, promising Iranians “the day of liberation is coming.”
However, with the Iranian opposition fragmented and no signs of divisions within the powerful Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which has nearly 250,000 fighters, including its Basij militia volunteers, there is scant prospect that Iran’s ruling elite would collapse easily.
There have been no major protests on the streets of Tehran, and many Iranians profess anger toward Israel for the attacks. Without a ground invasion or domestic uprising, regime change in Iran is a distant prospect, the officials said.
Mark Dubowitz, chief executive at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank in Washington, said Trump ultimately wanted a diplomatic solution, but he was likely to allow Israel more time to pursue its military campaign to give the US more leverage at the negotiating table.
Dubowitz, an Iran expert who has been consulted by the Trump administration on its policy, said Israel’s main objective appears to be setting back Iran’s nuclear program as many years as possible. Central to that is removing its human capacity by killing nuclear and weapons scientists, Dubowitz said, adding that his team had identified 10 to 12 more who are likely being hunted by Israel.
Israel’s assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September plunged the Lebanese group into disarray, but regional officials and observers warned that killing the ageing Khamenei would not have the same impact.
“Real power now resides with his son, Mojtaba, and the IRGC, which is deeply embedded despite the loss of key commanders,” one regional source said. “They remain the regime’s spine.”
Killing Khamenei, a religious leader to millions of Shiites, could cause a major backlash.
Jonathan Panikoff, a former deputy US national intelligence officer on the Middle East during Trump’s first term, said that if the Israeli campaign does foment regime change in Iran, it could result — at least initially — in a more hardline administration.
“What is likely to follow a theocratic Iranian government is not democracy but Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps–istan,” said Panikoff, now at the Atlantic Council think-tank. “Israel might find itself in a perpetual, ongoing, and far more intense war that is no longer in the shadows.”
If the conflict does escalate, regional officials fear a collapse of Khamenei’s government would not lead to democracy, but to fragmentation — or worse: a civil war, fueled by Iran’s marginalized minorities — Arabs, Kurds, Azeris, Baha’is, Baluchis and Christians — could erupt in a dangerous power vacuum.
“And that, no one is ready for,” a Gulf source said.
Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute, based in Washington, said that shockwaves from the collapse of the government in Tehran would not stop at Iran’s borders.
“A destabilized Iran could ignite unrest from Azerbaijan to Pakistan. Its collapse would reverberate across the region, destabilizing fragile states and reigniting dormant conflicts,” he said.
FAKE NEWS? ‘When the government demands the press become a state mouthpiece under the threat of punishment, something has gone very wrong,’ a civic group said The top US broadcast regulator on Saturday threatened media outlets over negative coverage of the Middle East war, after US President Donald Trump slammed critical headlines from the “Fake News Media.” The US president since his first term has derided mainstream media as “fake news” and has sued major outlets over what he sees as unfair coverage. Brendan Carr, head of the US Federal Communications Commission — which oversees the nation’s radio, television and Internet media — said broadcasters risked losing their licenses over news coverage. “The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will
INFLUTENTIAL THEORIST: Habermas was particularly critical of the ‘limited interest’ shown by German politicians in ‘shaping a politically effective Europe Jurgen Habermas, whose work on communication, rationality and sociology made him one of the world’s most influential philosophers and a key intellectual figure in his native Germany, has died. He was 96. Habermas’ publisher, Suhrkamp, said he died on Saturday in Starnberg, near Munich. Habermas frequently weighed in on political matters over several decades. His extensive writing crossed the boundaries of academic and philosophical disciplines, providing a vision of modern society and social interaction. His best-known works included the two-volume Theory of Communicative Action. Habermas, who was 15 at the time of Nazi Germany’s defeat, later recalled the dawn of
The Chinese public maintains relatively warm sentiments toward Taiwan and strongly prefers non-military paths to improving cross-strait relations, a recent survey conducted by the Atlanta, Georgia-based Carter Center and Emory University showed. The “China Pulse” research project, which polled 2,506 adults between Oct. 27 last year and Jan. 1 this year, found that 86 percent of respondents support strengthening cultural ties, while 81 percent favor deepening economic interaction. The report, co-authored by political scientists at Emory University and advisors at the Carter Center, indicates that the Chinese public views Taiwan’s importance through a lens of shared history and culture rather than geopolitical
Cannabis-based medicines have shown little evidence of effectiveness for treating most mental health and substance-use disorders, according to a large review of past studies published in a major medical journal on Monday. Medical use of cannabinoids has been expanding, including in the US, Canada and Australia, where many patients report using cannabis products to manage conditions such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and sleep problems. Researchers reviewed data from 54 randomized clinical trials conducted between 1980 and May last year involving 2,477 participants for their analysis published in The Lancet. The studies assessed cannabinoids as a primary treatment for mental disorders or substance-use
RSS