Mexico held unprecedented elections yesterday allowing voters to choose their judges at all levels, in a country where drug cartels and other vested interests regularly seek to alter the course of justice.
The Mexican government said the reform making Mexico the world’s only country to select all its judges and magistrates by popular vote is needed to tackle deep-rooted corruption and impunity.
However, there are concerns that the judiciary would be politicized and that it would become easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery.
Photo: Reuters
While corruption is already an issue, “there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organized crime than other methods of judicial selection,” said Margaret Satterthwaite, the UN special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers.
Judicial elections also “entail a risk that the electorate will not choose candidates based on their merit,” the independent expert said.
The run-up to the vote has not been accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico.
However, cartels are likely trying to influence the outcome in the shadows, said Luis Carlos Ugalde, a consultant and former head of Mexico’s electoral commission.
“It is logical that organized criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them,” Ugalde told a roundtable hosted by the Inter-American Dialogue.
Carlota Ramos, a lawyer in the office of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, said that while the risk of organized crime infiltrating state institutions was real, it had already been present and “invisible.”
The new system allowed greater scrutiny of aspiring judges, Ramos said.
Rights group Defensorxs has identified about 20 candidates it considers “high risk,” including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel cofounder Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.
“Every person has the right to counsel,” Delgado, who is standing to be a judge in the northern state of Chihuahua, said.
Fernando Escamilla, who is seeking to be a judge in the northern state of Nuevo Leon, was a lawyer for Miguel Angel Trevino, a former leader of the Los Zetas cartel, renowned for its brutality.
Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the US for drug crimes.
“I’ve never sold myself to you as the perfect candidate,” Leopoldo Chavez said in a video.
Yesterday, voters were to choose about 880 federal judges — including Mexican Supreme Court justices — as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder is to be held in 2027.
Candidates are supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed “a good reputation,” as well as no criminal record.
An American scientist convicted of lying to US authorities about payments from China while he was at Harvard University has rebuilt his research lab in Shenzhen, China, to pursue technology the Chinese government has identified as a national priority: embedding electronics into the human brain. Charles Lieber, 67, is among the world’s leading researchers in brain-computer interfaces. The technology has shown promise in treating conditions such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and restoring movement in paralyzed people. It also has potential military applications: Scientists at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army have investigated brain interfaces as a way to engineer super soldiers by boosting
Jailed media entrepreneur Jimmy Lai (黎智英) has been awarded Deutsche Welle’s (DW) freedom of speech award for his contribution to Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. The German public broadcaster on Thursday said Lai would be presented in absentia with the 12th iteration of the award on June 23 at the DW Global Media Forum in Bonn. Deutsche Welle director-general Barbara Massing praised the 78-year-old founder of the now-shuttered news outlet Apple Daily for standing “unwaveringly for press freedom in Hong Kong at great personal risk.” “With Apple Daily, he gave journalists a platform for free reporting and a voice to the democracy movement in
PHILIPPINE COMMITTEE: The head of the committee that made the decision said: ‘If there is nothing to hide, there is no reason to hide, there is no reason to obstruct’ A Philippine congressional committee on Wednesday ruled that there was “probable cause” to impeach Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte after hearing allegations of unexplained wealth, misuse of state funds and threats to have the president assassinated. The unanimous decision of the 53-member committee in the Philippine House of Representatives sends the two impeachment complaints to deliberations and voting by the entire lower chamber, which has more than 300 lawmakers. The complaints centered on Duterte’s alleged illegal use and mishandling of intelligence funds from the vice president’s office, and from her time as education secretary under Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Duterte and the
Burmese President Min Aung Hlaing yesterday cut all prisoners’ sentences by one-sixth, a blanket measure that a source close to deposed leader Aung San Suu Kyi said would further shorten her detention. Aung San Suu Kyi has been sequestered since a 2021 military coup, but the senior member of her dissolved National League for Democracy (NLD) party said that while her term had been reduced, her remaining sentence is still unclear. “We also don’t know exactly how many years she has left,” the source told reporters, speaking on condition of anonymity for security reasons. The military toppled Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government