Rich in solar and wind power, and bulging in critical minerals for renewable energy technology, Australia touts itself as a leader in the race to net zero carbon emissions, but a political battle is being waged ahead of tomorrow’s elections over whether to change the nation’s trajectory and add nuclear reactors to the mix for the first time.
The row is reminiscent of the “climate wars” — a years-long political face-off over the need to slash carbon emissions — that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to end when he took office three years ago.
Australia sits on some of the world’s largest uranium reserves, but it has legally banned nuclear power generation for a quarter of a century.
Photo: AP
In the run-up to the vote, opposition leader Peter Dutton announced a US$200 billion plan to build seven large-scale nuclear reactors by 2050.
His proposal would ramp up gas production, slow the rollout of solar and wind projects, and ditch the clean energy goals set by Albanese’s government.
Dutton says nuclear power would be cheaper and more reliable than renewable energy.
“I haven’t committed to nuclear energy for votes. I committed to it because it’s in the best interest of our country,” he said in a televised leaders’ debate.
Interest in nuclear power is growing internationally as nations struggle to cut their dependence on fossil fuels. Thirty-one governments, including the US, France and Britain, have signed a pledge to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050.
Australia is a fossil fuel powerhouse with vast reserves of coal and gas, but it is also drenched in sun, with a broad landscape to accommodate wind turbines and solar panels.
The Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation estimates that the nuclear option would be 50 percent more expensive for the nation than renewable energy and take at least 15 years to become operational.
“The total development lead time needed for nuclear means it cannot play a major role in electricity sector emission abatement,” the government agency said.
Even countries with decades of experience in nuclear power generation struggle to get plants running on time and on budget.
France started its latest reactor, Flamanville 3, in December last year — 12 years behind schedule and about 10 billion euros (US$11 billion) beyond its original budget of 3 billion euros.
Albanese has embraced the global push toward decarbonization, pouring public money into the renewable sector.
The share of renewable energy in Australia’s electricity generation has increased to record highs in the past few years, contributing 35 percent in 2023, government data showed.
The energy industry has largely backed a renewables-first pathway as coal-fired plants are retired.
“We are in a position now where coal-fired power stations are closing — and they have done a great job for a long time, but they are old and need to be replaced by something,” Clean Energy Council spokesman Chris O’Keefe said. “The best economic response for Australia right now is to continue on the path we are on. That is, building batteries, solar farms, wind farms.”
“What we are seeing is a situation where nuclear energy is being used as an idea to placate the fossil fuel industry and the people they have been traditionally aligned with, but the problem is it will not deliver a single electron for close to two decades,” O’Keefe said.
Dave Sweeney, nuclear power analyst at the Australian Conservation Foundation, said switching the energy strategy now would cause “economic dislocation and rupture.”
“Why change horses from renewables when you are halfway there?” Sweeney said. “This is a 1950s piece of policy that is promoting a 1950s sense of technology.”
If Dutton’s coalition wins the election, there would be strong community, local government and stakeholder pushback to nuclear reactors being built, Sweeney said.
“It would cause uncertainty, contest, fights and a lack of action around secure and clean energy. We would be back to hostile and conflict-fueled and unproductive climate and energy wars,” he said.
Still, nuclear supporters say the spotlight on the issue is long overdue.
“Our decades-old nuclear ban no longer reflects the realities of modern reactor technology or the shifting attitudes of Australians,” said Kirsty Braybon, a university academic and nuclear law expert at the Nuclear for Australia lobby group.
While other countries were moving ahead with nuclear, Australia was “held back by outdated prohibitions that stifle innovation, jobs and the chance to power a cleaner future,” she said.
See THE WAR on page 7
DEADLOCK: Putin has vowed to continue fighting unless Ukraine cedes more land, while talks have been paused with no immediate results expected, the Kremlin said Russia on Friday said that peace talks with Kyiv were on “pause” as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin still wanted to capture the whole of Ukraine. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump said that he was running out of patience with Putin, and the NATO alliance said it would bolster its eastern front after Russian drones were shot down in Polish airspace this week. The latest blow to faltering diplomacy came as Russia’s army staged major military drills with its key ally Belarus. Despite Trump forcing the warring sides to hold direct talks and hosting Putin in Alaska, there
North Korea has executed people for watching or distributing foreign television shows, including popular South Korean dramas, as part of an intensifying crackdown on personal freedoms, a UN human rights report said on Friday. Surveillance has grown more pervasive since 2014 with the help of new technologies, while punishments have become harsher — including the introduction of the death penalty for offences such as sharing foreign TV dramas, the report said. The curbs make North Korea the most restrictive country in the world, said the 14-page UN report, which was based on interviews with more than 300 witnesses and victims who had
COMFORT WOMEN CLASH: Japan has strongly rejected South Korean court rulings ordering the government to provide reparations to Korean victims of sexual slavery The Japanese government yesterday defended its stance on wartime sexual slavery and described South Korean court rulings ordering Japanese compensation as violations of international law, after UN investigators criticized Tokyo for failing to ensure truth-finding and reparations for the victims. In its own response to UN human rights rapporteurs, South Korea called on Japan to “squarely face up to our painful history” and cited how Tokyo’s refusal to comply with court orders have denied the victims payment. The statements underscored how the two Asian US allies still hold key differences on the issue, even as they pause their on-and-off disputes over historical
CONSOLIDATION: The Indonesian president has used the moment to replace figures from former president Jokowi’s tenure with loyal allies In removing Indonesia’s finance minister and U-turning on protester demands, the leader of Southeast Asia’s biggest economy is scrambling to restore public trust while seizing a chance to install loyalists after deadly riots last month, experts say. Demonstrations that were sparked by low wages, unemployment and anger over lawmakers’ lavish perks grew after footage spread of a paramilitary police vehicle running over a delivery motorcycle driver. The ensuing riots, which rights groups say left at least 10 dead and hundreds detained, were the biggest of Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s term, and the ex-general is now calling on the public to restore their
RSS