Rich in solar and wind power, and bulging in critical minerals for renewable energy technology, Australia touts itself as a leader in the race to net zero carbon emissions, but a political battle is being waged ahead of tomorrow’s elections over whether to change the nation’s trajectory and add nuclear reactors to the mix for the first time.
The row is reminiscent of the “climate wars” — a years-long political face-off over the need to slash carbon emissions — that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to end when he took office three years ago.
Australia sits on some of the world’s largest uranium reserves, but it has legally banned nuclear power generation for a quarter of a century.
Photo: AP
In the run-up to the vote, opposition leader Peter Dutton announced a US$200 billion plan to build seven large-scale nuclear reactors by 2050.
His proposal would ramp up gas production, slow the rollout of solar and wind projects, and ditch the clean energy goals set by Albanese’s government.
Dutton says nuclear power would be cheaper and more reliable than renewable energy.
“I haven’t committed to nuclear energy for votes. I committed to it because it’s in the best interest of our country,” he said in a televised leaders’ debate.
Interest in nuclear power is growing internationally as nations struggle to cut their dependence on fossil fuels. Thirty-one governments, including the US, France and Britain, have signed a pledge to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050.
Australia is a fossil fuel powerhouse with vast reserves of coal and gas, but it is also drenched in sun, with a broad landscape to accommodate wind turbines and solar panels.
The Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation estimates that the nuclear option would be 50 percent more expensive for the nation than renewable energy and take at least 15 years to become operational.
“The total development lead time needed for nuclear means it cannot play a major role in electricity sector emission abatement,” the government agency said.
Even countries with decades of experience in nuclear power generation struggle to get plants running on time and on budget.
France started its latest reactor, Flamanville 3, in December last year — 12 years behind schedule and about 10 billion euros (US$11 billion) beyond its original budget of 3 billion euros.
Albanese has embraced the global push toward decarbonization, pouring public money into the renewable sector.
The share of renewable energy in Australia’s electricity generation has increased to record highs in the past few years, contributing 35 percent in 2023, government data showed.
The energy industry has largely backed a renewables-first pathway as coal-fired plants are retired.
“We are in a position now where coal-fired power stations are closing — and they have done a great job for a long time, but they are old and need to be replaced by something,” Clean Energy Council spokesman Chris O’Keefe said. “The best economic response for Australia right now is to continue on the path we are on. That is, building batteries, solar farms, wind farms.”
“What we are seeing is a situation where nuclear energy is being used as an idea to placate the fossil fuel industry and the people they have been traditionally aligned with, but the problem is it will not deliver a single electron for close to two decades,” O’Keefe said.
Dave Sweeney, nuclear power analyst at the Australian Conservation Foundation, said switching the energy strategy now would cause “economic dislocation and rupture.”
“Why change horses from renewables when you are halfway there?” Sweeney said. “This is a 1950s piece of policy that is promoting a 1950s sense of technology.”
If Dutton’s coalition wins the election, there would be strong community, local government and stakeholder pushback to nuclear reactors being built, Sweeney said.
“It would cause uncertainty, contest, fights and a lack of action around secure and clean energy. We would be back to hostile and conflict-fueled and unproductive climate and energy wars,” he said.
Still, nuclear supporters say the spotlight on the issue is long overdue.
“Our decades-old nuclear ban no longer reflects the realities of modern reactor technology or the shifting attitudes of Australians,” said Kirsty Braybon, a university academic and nuclear law expert at the Nuclear for Australia lobby group.
While other countries were moving ahead with nuclear, Australia was “held back by outdated prohibitions that stifle innovation, jobs and the chance to power a cleaner future,” she said.
See THE WAR on page 7
An American scientist convicted of lying to US authorities about payments from China while he was at Harvard University has rebuilt his research lab in Shenzhen, China, to pursue technology the Chinese government has identified as a national priority: embedding electronics into the human brain. Charles Lieber, 67, is among the world’s leading researchers in brain-computer interfaces. The technology has shown promise in treating conditions such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and restoring movement in paralyzed people. It also has potential military applications: Scientists at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army have investigated brain interfaces as a way to engineer super soldiers by boosting
Jailed media entrepreneur Jimmy Lai (黎智英) has been awarded Deutsche Welle’s (DW) freedom of speech award for his contribution to Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. The German public broadcaster on Thursday said Lai would be presented in absentia with the 12th iteration of the award on June 23 at the DW Global Media Forum in Bonn. Deutsche Welle director-general Barbara Massing praised the 78-year-old founder of the now-shuttered news outlet Apple Daily for standing “unwaveringly for press freedom in Hong Kong at great personal risk.” “With Apple Daily, he gave journalists a platform for free reporting and a voice to the democracy movement in
PHILIPPINE COMMITTEE: The head of the committee that made the decision said: ‘If there is nothing to hide, there is no reason to hide, there is no reason to obstruct’ A Philippine congressional committee on Wednesday ruled that there was “probable cause” to impeach Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte after hearing allegations of unexplained wealth, misuse of state funds and threats to have the president assassinated. The unanimous decision of the 53-member committee in the Philippine House of Representatives sends the two impeachment complaints to deliberations and voting by the entire lower chamber, which has more than 300 lawmakers. The complaints centered on Duterte’s alleged illegal use and mishandling of intelligence funds from the vice president’s office, and from her time as education secretary under Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Duterte and the
Burmese President Min Aung Hlaing yesterday cut all prisoners’ sentences by one-sixth, a blanket measure that a source close to deposed leader Aung San Suu Kyi said would further shorten her detention. Aung San Suu Kyi has been sequestered since a 2021 military coup, but the senior member of her dissolved National League for Democracy (NLD) party said that while her term had been reduced, her remaining sentence is still unclear. “We also don’t know exactly how many years she has left,” the source told reporters, speaking on condition of anonymity for security reasons. The military toppled Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government
RSS