Lawmakers on Monday overwhelmingly backed constitutional changes targeting the Hungary’s LGBTQ community and dual nationals, the latest step to strengthen Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s self-styled “illiberal” brand of democracy.
Since his return to power in 2010, Hungary’s leader has widely restricted the rights of the LGBTQ community, the media, courts and academia. He vowed last month to undertake an “Easter cleanup” against his domestic opponents he has called “stink bugs.”
The constitutional amendment — which proclaims that people can only be male or female — echoes moves on gender by Orban’s ally US President Donald Trump.
Photo: AFP
It also allows the “temporary” stripping of citizenship from some dual or multiple nationals, which could target Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros, a regular fixture of populist conspiracy theories.
Ahead of the vote on the amendment — which passed parliament with 140 votes in favor to 21 against — a few dozen protesters temporarily blocked an entrance to parliament before police hauled them off.
“When we chained ourselves up during the constitution’s first overhaul in 2011, we never thought that 14 years later we would have to do the same thing,” opposition lawmaker Timea Szabo said.
Opposition politicians from Momentum unfurled a banner to protest the vote in parliament, while hundreds of protesters outside the building chanted: “We will not allow ourselves to be transformed into Putin’s Russia.”
Ruby, a 19-year-old transgender woman, who declined to give her surname, said that she joined the rally to stand up against the government which seeks “to eliminate transgender people” and “hide what they don’t like, just as in Russia.”
Besides the provision proclaiming that people can only be male or female, another declares that children’s rights for their “proper physical, mental and moral development take precedence over all other fundamental rights,” except the right to life.
That provision is seen as a way to strengthen the legal foundations for the prohibition of Pride marches.
Another prominent provision empowers the government to temporarily strip Hungarian citizenship from dual or multiple nationals — even if they acquired their nationalities by birth.
The governing party suggested the move is aimed at “speculators” financing “bogus non-governmental organizations, bought politicians and the so-called independent media from abroad.”
A related piece of legislation — to be voted on at a later date — specifies that Hungarian citizenship can be suspended for a maximum of 10 years and those affected can be expelled from the nation.
Nationals from other EU member states would be exempt, together with a few other nations in Europe, the proposal says.
More than 30 prominent Hungarian legal experts last week castigated the measure as “an unprecedented construction in international law” that could be contrary to binding human rights conventions.
Critics say the proposed legal changes further erode democratic rights in the central European nation, moving the EU member state even closer to the kind of authoritarianism seen under Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“You could consider this soft Putinism,” said Szabolcs Pek, chief analyst at the think tank Iranytu Intezet. “People are not falling out of the window, but the government is increasingly limiting the space for opposition politicians, journalists and civil society.”
Politically, the measures are seen as an effort to shore up dwindling support for the ruling coalition, divide the opposition along ideological lines and court the far right ahead of next year’s parliamentary election.
Orban’s legislative “boisterousness” is a bid to take back control of the public agenda, Pek said.
“In this respect, he has been successful, because public discourse is no longer about failing public services or the weak economy,” he said.
FAKE NEWS? ‘When the government demands the press become a state mouthpiece under the threat of punishment, something has gone very wrong,’ a civic group said The top US broadcast regulator on Saturday threatened media outlets over negative coverage of the Middle East war, after US President Donald Trump slammed critical headlines from the “Fake News Media.” The US president since his first term has derided mainstream media as “fake news” and has sued major outlets over what he sees as unfair coverage. Brendan Carr, head of the US Federal Communications Commission — which oversees the nation’s radio, television and Internet media — said broadcasters risked losing their licenses over news coverage. “The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will
INFLUTENTIAL THEORIST: Habermas was particularly critical of the ‘limited interest’ shown by German politicians in ‘shaping a politically effective Europe Jurgen Habermas, whose work on communication, rationality and sociology made him one of the world’s most influential philosophers and a key intellectual figure in his native Germany, has died. He was 96. Habermas’ publisher, Suhrkamp, said he died on Saturday in Starnberg, near Munich. Habermas frequently weighed in on political matters over several decades. His extensive writing crossed the boundaries of academic and philosophical disciplines, providing a vision of modern society and social interaction. His best-known works included the two-volume Theory of Communicative Action. Habermas, who was 15 at the time of Nazi Germany’s defeat, later recalled the dawn of
The Chinese public maintains relatively warm sentiments toward Taiwan and strongly prefers non-military paths to improving cross-strait relations, a recent survey conducted by the Atlanta, Georgia-based Carter Center and Emory University showed. The “China Pulse” research project, which polled 2,506 adults between Oct. 27 last year and Jan. 1 this year, found that 86 percent of respondents support strengthening cultural ties, while 81 percent favor deepening economic interaction. The report, co-authored by political scientists at Emory University and advisors at the Carter Center, indicates that the Chinese public views Taiwan’s importance through a lens of shared history and culture rather than geopolitical
Cannabis-based medicines have shown little evidence of effectiveness for treating most mental health and substance-use disorders, according to a large review of past studies published in a major medical journal on Monday. Medical use of cannabinoids has been expanding, including in the US, Canada and Australia, where many patients report using cannabis products to manage conditions such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and sleep problems. Researchers reviewed data from 54 randomized clinical trials conducted between 1980 and May last year involving 2,477 participants for their analysis published in The Lancet. The studies assessed cannabinoids as a primary treatment for mental disorders or substance-use
RSS