With anti-government protests sweeping across Turkey, the authorities have used all technological means to try to curb them, from restricting Internet access to using facial recognition to identify protesters, who have been forced to adapt.
Amid a ban on protests, about 2,000 people have been arrested in connection with the demonstrations that erupted on March 19 following the detention of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu on graft charges. As well as those apprehended in the streets, many others have been arrested in predawn raids at their homes after being identified from footage or photos taken by the police during the demonstrations. So far, 13 Turkish journalists have been detained for covering the protests, including Agence France-Presse (AFP) photographer Yasin Akgul, who was charged with “taking part in illegal rallies and marches” on the basis of images shot by the police.
For Orhan Sener, a digital technologies expert, the use of technology marks a major departure from 2013, when a small protest against plans to demolish Gezi Park in central Istanbul snowballed into a wave of national unrest over the rule of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who was prime minister then.
Photo: AFP
“The security forces’ information technology capabilities have increased considerably since then,” Sener said.
“During the Gezi movement, the protesters dominated social networks, and the police weren’t able to identify them,” he said. “But today, when you join a demonstration in Turkey, your face is recognized by a camera and the system cross-references it with your profile on social networks.”
Faced with such a risk, many demonstrators are now covering their heads and faces with hats, masks and scarves. In Istanbul, police have frequently surrounded protesters and ordered them to uncover their faces so they can be filmed, refusing to let them go if they do not, generating widespread distress for many young people, AFP correspondents said.
“Every means of pressure generates a countermeasure. We will soon see greater use of different clothing, glasses or makeup to thwart facial recognition technologies,” said Arif Kosar, who specializes in the impact of new technologies.
“But I don’t think facial recognition technology is the main source of pressure today. The use of disinformation to smear the protests, or neutralize and divide them, plays a more important role,” he said.
Erdogan has denounced the protests as “street terror,” accusing participants of “vandalizing” a mosque and a cemetery, charges the opposition has denied.
“Authoritarian regimes now know how to use the Internet to their advantage. They have found ways of censoring it,” Sener said. “But above all, they use it for their own propaganda.”
Immediately after Imamoglu’s arrest in a predawn raid, which he recounted on X before being taken away, the authorities started reducing bandwidth for Internet users in Istanbul, rendering access to social networks impossible for 42 hours. They also asked the social media platform X to close more than 700 accounts belonging to journalists, news organizations, political figures and students among others, the platform said.
“There was no court decision behind the bandwidth reduction or the bid to block X accounts. These measures were put in place arbitrarily,” said Yaman Akdeniz, a law professor and head of Turkey’s Freedom of Expression Association.
There was legislation being prepared that would require messaging services such as WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram to open offices in Turkey and disclose users’ identities to the authorities, Akdeniz said.
“We are moving towards a surveillance state,” he said.
Since 2020, Internet service providers have provided data on online activities and the identity of Internet users to the Turkish Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK), news Web site Medyascope revealed in 2022.
“By law, the BTK can only keep the data collected for two years. However, we have seen data going back 10 years being provided to prosecutors during the investigation into the Istanbul mayor,” Akdeniz said.
“This data retention, despite the law, for purposes which are unknown, opens the way for arbitrary practices,” he said.
For Sener, activism in the real world and online “used to be two different worlds, but now they are intertwined.”
With facial recognition, “the government is trying to discourage people from joining demonstrations, while hindering their mobilization through social networks,” he said.
VAGUE: The criteria of the amnesty remain unclear, but it would cover political violence from 1999 to today, and those convicted of murder or drug trafficking would not qualify Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodriguez on Friday announced an amnesty bill that could lead to the release of hundreds of prisoners, including opposition leaders, journalists and human rights activists detained for political reasons. The measure had long been sought by the US-backed opposition. It is the latest concession Rodriguez has made since taking the reins of the country on Jan. 3 after the brazen seizure of then-Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro. Rodriguez told a gathering of justices, magistrates, ministers, military brass and other government leaders that the ruling party-controlled Venezuelan National Assembly would take up the bill with urgency. Rodriguez also announced the shutdown
Civil society leaders and members of a left-wing coalition yesterday filed impeachment complaints against Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte, restarting a process sidelined by the Supreme Court last year. Both cases accuse Duterte of misusing public funds during her term as education secretary, while one revives allegations that she threatened to assassinate former ally Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The filings come on the same day that a committee in the House of Representatives was to begin hearings into impeachment complaints against Marcos, accused of corruption tied to a spiraling scandal over bogus flood control projects. Under the constitution, an impeachment by the
Exiled Tibetans began a unique global election yesterday for a government representing a homeland many have never seen, as part of a democratic exercise voters say carries great weight. From red-robed Buddhist monks in the snowy Himalayas, to political exiles in megacities across South Asia, to refugees in Australia, Europe and North America, voting takes place in 27 countries — but not China. “Elections ... show that the struggle for Tibet’s freedom and independence continues from generation to generation,” said candidate Gyaltsen Chokye, 33, who is based in the Indian hill-town of Dharamsala, headquarters of the government-in-exile, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA). It
China executed 11 people linked to Myanmar criminal gangs, including “key members” of telecom scam operations, state media reported yesterday, as Beijing toughens its response to the sprawling, transnational industry. Fraud compounds where scammers lure Internet users into fake romantic relationships and cryptocurrency investments have flourished across Southeast Asia, including in Myanmar. Initially largely targeting Chinese speakers, the criminal groups behind the compounds have expanded operations into multiple languages to steal from victims around the world. Those conducting the scams are sometimes willing con artists, and other times trafficked foreign nationals forced to work. In the past few years, Beijing has stepped up cooperation
RSS