Fri, Jan 19, 2024 page5

• Lawmakers raise doubts about US Navy logistics

  INDO-PACIFIC CONFLICT: The US House committee on China said the defense department lacked a long-term solution to sustain US bases, ships and aircraft in the area

  • Reuters, WASHINGTON
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A US congressional committee on China has sent a letter to the secretary of the US Navy raising doubts about a plan to move fuel from Hawaii to storage facilities across the Indo-Pacific and warning that the US military risks being unprepared for a possible conflict.

  In a letter dated Jan. 17, US Representative Mike Gallagher, the Republican chair of the House of Representatives’ Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, told US Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro that a long-term plan to redistribute fuel from Hawaii’s Red Hill underground bulk storage facility was a “strategic imperative” in light of China’s historic military buildup.

  The Pentagon in October last year began to drain the 1940s-era Red Hill facility at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam after a leak contaminated the water systems there, and said the fuel would be loaded onto tanker ships and transported to existing support sites. The full closure of the site is expected to take several years.

  

  US Representative Mike Gallagher, left, chair of the House of Representatives’ Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, delivers remarks to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Blank Paper Movement in China alongside a group of students and Chinese democracy campaigners outside the US Capitol in Washington on Nov. 29.

  Photo: AFP

  Gallagher wrote that he was not convinced the US Department of Defense had developed a long-term solution and that without a robust logistics network to sustain US bases, ships and aircraft with fuel, the US military in the Pacific would “grind to a halt.”

  “It is unclear how exactly the navy will replace and distribute the aggregate bulk fuel capacity of Red Hill,” Gallagher said, adding that storage capacity at new dispersed locations would require more frequent trips by ships around the Pacific, adding to operational risk.

  “As with all congressional correspondence, the Department of the Navy will respond, as appropriate,” a US Navy spokesperson said. “We have nothing additional to provide at this time.”

  US military experts have warned about gaps in US defense logistics as China, which now has more naval vessels than the US, has dramatically expanded its military and not ruled out using force to bring Taiwan under its control.

  US officials have turned to commercial tankers under the Tanker Security Program to give the Pentagon access to US-registered vessels to deliver fuel to the military in the event of a crisis.

  That program would not be enough, Gallagher said.

  “The navy appears to be short — by several dozen — ships that will be needed to transport and deliver fuel to our bases and forces operating across the Indo-Pacific,” Gallagher said, citing a 2016 Department of Defense determination that it would need 86 tankers to move equipment and supplies for global operations.

  Gallagher requested that Del Toro detail in writing to the committee whether the department had enough forward fuel storage facilities and access to refinery capacity for operations in the Indo-Pacific region, whether it had identified secure locations to build replacement facilities for Red Hill, and whether it had plans to integrate facilities of allies and partners in redistributing fuel.

  “We must address potential weaknesses in our logistical supply lines, while we still have the time to do so,” he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    CGA urges China not to use shipwreck for gain

  • 2

    China ‘incentives’ fail to sway Taiwan

  • 3

    Taipei-born US astronaut to visit Taiwan next week

  • 4

    KMT voices concern over migrant worker plan

  • 5

    Cuts to amusement tax advanced