US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s arrival in Taiwan on Tuesday has inflamed US-China relations anew, with China’s military announcing live-fire exercises around the nation and Chinese media condemning the visit as “stupid, reckless and dangerous.”
Meanwhile, US commentators across the ideological spectrum, from Thomas Friedman to Tucker Carlson to Code Pink, have called Pelosi’s trip a reckless provocation to war.
However, to Taiwanese Americans who have spent a lifetime grappling with the nation’s geopolitical status, the hyperbolic tenor of the debate over Pelosi’s visit is indicative of how little most Americans know or care about the people of Taiwan.
“All of the hoopla and yellow journalism blowing up, it really only serves to bolster the Chinese acts of aggression,” said SueAnn Shiah (夏叔安), a 30-year-old writer and theologian who has made a film about Taiwanese-American identity. “People come in with very little to no background knowledge, and often with a hyperbolic, fearmongering attitude. And then I’m hearing a lot of my people in Taiwan who have an extremely different approach to this situation.”
Taiwanese and Taiwanese Americans have long debated whether the nation should formally declare independence, seek unification with China or maintain the “status quo.”
It is a heated debate that occurs under the daily threat of Chinese aggression, which is something that Americans — including anti-war protesters — often do not understand, Shiah said.
“I just want Americans to de-center themselves for a second,” she said. “I’m not going to pretend that the United States does not participate in imperialism, but in the specific case of Taiwan, the war is not being mongered by the United States. It’s acts of imperialist aggression from China. For those familiar with complexities of Taiwan situation, we understand US support as a deterrent to war.”
Taiwan is kept out of international bodies, while just a handful of countries officially recognize the nation. That ambiguity can be confusing, even to Taiwanese Americans.
“When I was growing up, I kept hearing that the US agrees with China’s position that Taiwan is a part of China,” said Jessica Drun, a nonresident fellow at the Global China Hub of the Atlantic Council, a pro-NATO think tank. “It wasn’t until I came to [Washington] DC that I was able to parse out the truth that fundamentally the US does not take a position on Taiwan’s status.”
Drun warned that China would use Pelosi’s visit to “shift the blame of any escalation or actions they take against Taiwan on to the United States, for supposedly violating the [‘one China’ principle].”
“It’s important for us to push back on that narrative — we’ve never agreed,” she said.
Others hope the administration of US President Joe Biden might help create a new paradigm for the debate around Taiwan’s future.
Albert Wu (吳孟軒), a Taiwanese-American historian based in Taipei, said that Pelosi’s visit is a “huge deal symbolically.”
However, the framing of the story around US-China conflict repeats a common problem in Western stories about Taiwan: It erases Taiwan’s perspective, Wu said.
“Even in the coverage of this Pelosi situation, which has brought so much attention to Taiwan, there’s just very little about what the actors in Taiwan are actually thinking,” he said. “The narrative is, still: You need the US to come in and save Taiwan.”
Instead, he would like to see a rethinking of international relations where Taiwan has a say in its future.
“If the Biden administration could say: ‘OK, let’s try to get all of us on talking terms,’ or even try to broker some sort of conversation, I feel like that would be so much more exciting to people in Taiwan,” he said.
Still, Wu is wary of how supporters of Taiwanese independence have shown a willingness to ally with American politicians based on their hawkishness toward China.
“I feel very uncomfortable that we have to rely on people like [former US secretary of state] Mike Pompeo for security, and they have no qualms about it,” Wu said. “They’re like: ‘Anybody who supports Taiwanese independence, or anybody who even is willing to toe the line and be a little bit more belligerent and in your face with China, that is an ally.’”
OUTRAGE: The former strongman was accused of corruption and responsibility for the killings of hundreds of thousands of political opponents during his time in office Indonesia yesterday awarded the title of national hero to late president Suharto, provoking outrage from rights groups who said the move was an attempt to whitewash decades of human rights abuses and corruption that took place during his 32 years in power. Suharto was a US ally during the Cold War who presided over decades of authoritarian rule, during which up to 1 million political opponents were killed, until he was toppled by protests in 1998. He was one of 10 people recognized by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto in a televised ceremony held at the presidential palace in Jakarta to mark National
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr yesterday vowed that those behind bogus flood control projects would be arrested before Christmas, days after deadly back-to-back typhoons left swathes of the country underwater. Scores of construction firm owners, government officials and lawmakers — including Marcos’ cousin congressman — have been accused of pocketing funds for substandard or so-called “ghost” infrastructure projects. The Philippine Department of Finance has estimated the nation’s economy lost up to 118.5 billion pesos (US$2 billion) since 2023 due to corruption in flood control projects. Criminal cases against most of the people implicated are nearly complete, Marcos told reporters. “We don’t file cases for
Ecuadorans are today to vote on whether to allow the return of foreign military bases and the drafting of a new constitution that could give the country’s president more power. Voters are to decide on the presence of foreign military bases, which have been banned on Ecuadoran soil since 2008. A “yes” vote would likely bring the return of the US military to the Manta air base on the Pacific coast — once a hub for US anti-drug operations. Other questions concern ending public funding for political parties, reducing the number of lawmakers and creating an elected body that would
LANDMARK: After first meeting Trump in Riyadh in May, al-Sharaa’s visit to the White House today would be the first by a Syrian leader since the country’s independence Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa arrived in the US on Saturday for a landmark official visit, his country’s state news agency SANA reported, a day after Washington removed him from a terrorism blacklist. Sharaa, whose rebel forces ousted long-time former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad late last year, is due to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House today. It is the first such visit by a Syrian president since the country’s independence in 1946, according to analysts. The interim leader met Trump for the first time in Riyadh during the US president’s regional tour in May. US envoy to Syria Tom Barrack earlier