The WHO is battling critics of its COVID-19 response who say it is scheming to take over health policy in sovereign nations as it pushes plans it says would help avert future pandemics.
High-profile attempts in countries around the world to discredit the WHO’s efforts are casting a shadow over talks in Geneva, Switzerland, this week.
Country representatives at the talks are discussing how to pave the way for a global agreement that could eventually regulate how nations prepare for and respond to future pandemic threats.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“We may face more severe pandemics in the future and we need to be a hell of a lot better prepared than we are now,” WHO Health Emergencies Program executive director Michael Ryan told reporters recently. “That’s going to require countries to work together.”
It is still far from clear what any future agreement would contain and whether countries would decide that they want it to be a treaty or some other “legal instrument.”
The negotiations — involving member states, not the WHO — are set to last at least two years.
Photo: AFP
However, critics have said that the UN health body is out for a power grab.
Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson, in a segment last month on the pandemic treaty, said that US President Joe Biden’s administration was close to “handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect, the intimate aspects of your life.”
Christine Anderson, a German member of the European Parliament, has warned that the agreement would grant “the WHO de facto governing power over member states.”
British comedian and YouTuber Russell Brand — who challenged the WHO over its attitude toward Taiwan — told his audience that the future treaty meant “your democracy is ... finished.”
“The solution to our ... [pandemic] problems is not to grant more power to an organization that is primarily funded by the United States of America, then Bill Gates’ foundation then the United Kingdom,” he said in a video released on May 21. “I think that they might be subject to biases that are at odds with ... our health requirements.”
The WHO and experts say that such theories, which have also been mentioned in Germany, Australia, Russia and other countries, have nothing to do with what is being discussed.
“I am frankly baffled by the degree of disinformation,” Suerie Moon, codirector of the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute, told reporters, adding that the agreement “is really in the embryonic stage.”
Many of the claims are “completely disconnected from the reality of what is being proposed and potentially negotiated,” Moon said.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also recently said that “unfortunately, there has been a small minority of groups making misleading statements and purposefully distorting facts.”
The “WHO’s agenda is public, open and transparent,” Tedros said.
The pandemic agreement is solely about establishing “the playbook for how we’re going to prepare together” for future pandemic threats, Ryan said.
“That’s not about sovereignty; that’s about responsibility,” he said.
However, proponents of the plans are struggling to make such arguments heard.
The WHO coined the term “infodemic,” saying that there was a deluge of disinformation surrounding its efforts to rein in the COVID-19 pandemic, especially regarding vaccines.
And now observers suggest that the WHO and the planned agreement it is pushing for have become targets of a disinformation campaign across multiple countries, although the exact goal and who is behind it remain unclear.
Just the name WHO “is like a trigger,” Tristan Mendes France, a French conspiracy theory expert, told reporters, adding that it was easy to “reactivate” the “huge conspiracy theory audience that has been growing during COVID.”
Sebastian Dieguez, a neuroscientist and disinformation expert at Switzerland’s University of Fribourg, pointed to how social media groups dedicated to one form of extremist thought or conspiracy theory often switch names and topics, bringing hundreds of thousands of followers along.
“When you have a solid network on something, it can be used for other things,” he said.
“Even though some of it is absurd, you still have to deal with it, you still have to explain, and this cuts out resources,” Dieguez said.
Moon said that there “are limits to what WHO can do,” pointing to rampant misinformation — when faulty information is shared due to honest misunderstandings — and mistrust in authorities across the board in “this post-truth era, where people live in different information universes.”
“Can WHO change that? Can anybody?” she asked.
Additional reporting by staff writer
A missing fingertip offers a clue to Mako Nishimura’s criminal past as one of Japan’s few female yakuza, but after clawing her way out of the underworld, she now spends her days helping other retired gangsters reintegrate into society. The multibillion-dollar yakuza organized crime network has long ruled over Japan’s drug rings, illicit gambling dens and sex trade. In the past few years, the empire has started to crumble as members have dwindled and laws targeting mafia are tightened. An intensifying police crackdown has shrunk yakuza forces nationwide, with their numbers dipping below 20,000 last year for the first time since records
EXTRADITION FEARS: The legislative changes come five years after a treaty was suspended in response to the territory’s crackdown on democracy advocates Exiled Hong Kong dissidents said they fear UK government plans to restart some extraditions with the territory could put them in greater danger, adding that Hong Kong authorities would use any pretext to pursue them. An amendment to UK extradition laws was passed on Tuesday. It came more than five years after the UK and several other countries suspended extradition treaties with Hong Kong in response to a government crackdown on the democracy movement and its imposition of a National Security Law. The British Home Office said that the suspension of the treaty made all extraditions with Hong Kong impossible “even if
CAUSE UNKNOWN: Weather and runway conditions were suitable for flight operations at the time of the accident, and no distress signal was sent, authorities said A cargo aircraft skidded off the runway into the sea at Hong Kong International Airport early yesterday, killing two ground crew in a patrol car, in one of the worst accidents in the airport’s 27-year history. The incident occurred at about 3:50am, when the plane is suspected to have lost control upon landing, veering off the runway and crashing through a fence, the Airport Authority Hong Kong said. The jet hit a security patrol car on the perimeter road outside the runway zone, which then fell into the water, it said in a statement. The four crew members on the plane, which
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its junior partner yesterday signed a coalition deal, paving the way for Sanae Takaichi to become the nation’s first female prime minister. The 11th-hour agreement with the Japan Innovation Party (JIP) came just a day before the lower house was due to vote on Takaichi’s appointment as the fifth prime minister in as many years. If she wins, she will take office the same day. “I’m very much looking forward to working with you on efforts to make Japan’s economy stronger, and to reshape Japan as a country that can be responsible for future generations,”
RSS