The WHO is battling critics of its COVID-19 response who say it is scheming to take over health policy in sovereign nations as it pushes plans it says would help avert future pandemics.
High-profile attempts in countries around the world to discredit the WHO’s efforts are casting a shadow over talks in Geneva, Switzerland, this week.
Country representatives at the talks are discussing how to pave the way for a global agreement that could eventually regulate how nations prepare for and respond to future pandemic threats.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“We may face more severe pandemics in the future and we need to be a hell of a lot better prepared than we are now,” WHO Health Emergencies Program executive director Michael Ryan told reporters recently. “That’s going to require countries to work together.”
It is still far from clear what any future agreement would contain and whether countries would decide that they want it to be a treaty or some other “legal instrument.”
The negotiations — involving member states, not the WHO — are set to last at least two years.
Photo: AFP
However, critics have said that the UN health body is out for a power grab.
Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson, in a segment last month on the pandemic treaty, said that US President Joe Biden’s administration was close to “handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect, the intimate aspects of your life.”
Christine Anderson, a German member of the European Parliament, has warned that the agreement would grant “the WHO de facto governing power over member states.”
British comedian and YouTuber Russell Brand — who challenged the WHO over its attitude toward Taiwan — told his audience that the future treaty meant “your democracy is ... finished.”
“The solution to our ... [pandemic] problems is not to grant more power to an organization that is primarily funded by the United States of America, then Bill Gates’ foundation then the United Kingdom,” he said in a video released on May 21. “I think that they might be subject to biases that are at odds with ... our health requirements.”
The WHO and experts say that such theories, which have also been mentioned in Germany, Australia, Russia and other countries, have nothing to do with what is being discussed.
“I am frankly baffled by the degree of disinformation,” Suerie Moon, codirector of the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute, told reporters, adding that the agreement “is really in the embryonic stage.”
Many of the claims are “completely disconnected from the reality of what is being proposed and potentially negotiated,” Moon said.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also recently said that “unfortunately, there has been a small minority of groups making misleading statements and purposefully distorting facts.”
The “WHO’s agenda is public, open and transparent,” Tedros said.
The pandemic agreement is solely about establishing “the playbook for how we’re going to prepare together” for future pandemic threats, Ryan said.
“That’s not about sovereignty; that’s about responsibility,” he said.
However, proponents of the plans are struggling to make such arguments heard.
The WHO coined the term “infodemic,” saying that there was a deluge of disinformation surrounding its efforts to rein in the COVID-19 pandemic, especially regarding vaccines.
And now observers suggest that the WHO and the planned agreement it is pushing for have become targets of a disinformation campaign across multiple countries, although the exact goal and who is behind it remain unclear.
Just the name WHO “is like a trigger,” Tristan Mendes France, a French conspiracy theory expert, told reporters, adding that it was easy to “reactivate” the “huge conspiracy theory audience that has been growing during COVID.”
Sebastian Dieguez, a neuroscientist and disinformation expert at Switzerland’s University of Fribourg, pointed to how social media groups dedicated to one form of extremist thought or conspiracy theory often switch names and topics, bringing hundreds of thousands of followers along.
“When you have a solid network on something, it can be used for other things,” he said.
“Even though some of it is absurd, you still have to deal with it, you still have to explain, and this cuts out resources,” Dieguez said.
Moon said that there “are limits to what WHO can do,” pointing to rampant misinformation — when faulty information is shared due to honest misunderstandings — and mistrust in authorities across the board in “this post-truth era, where people live in different information universes.”
“Can WHO change that? Can anybody?” she asked.
Additional reporting by staff writer
AFGHAN CHILD: A court battle is ongoing over if the toddler can stay with Joshua Mast and his wife, who wanted ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ for her Major Joshua Mast, a US Marine whose adoption of an Afghan war orphan has spurred a years-long legal battle, is to remain on active duty after a three-member panel of Marines on Tuesday found that while he acted in a way unbecoming of an officer to bring home the baby girl, it did not warrant his separation from the military. Lawyers for the Marine Corps argued that Mast abused his position, disregarded orders of his superiors, mishandled classified information and improperly used a government computer in his fight over the child who was found orphaned on the battlefield in rural Afghanistan
STICKING TO DEFENSE: Despite the screening of videos in which they appeared, one of the defendants said they had no memory of the event A court trying a Frenchman charged with drugging his wife and enlisting dozens of strangers to rape her screened videos of the abuse to the public on Friday, to challenge several codefendants who denied knowing she was unconscious during their actions. The judge in the southern city of Avignon had nine videos and several photographs of the abuse of Gisele Pelicot shown in the courtroom and an adjoining public chamber, involving seven of the 50 men accused alongside her husband. Present in the courtroom herself, Gisele Pelicot looked at her telephone during the hour and a half of screenings, while her ex-husband
NEW STORM: investigators dubbed the attacks on US telecoms ‘Salt Typhoon,’ after authorities earlier this year disrupted China’s ‘Flax Typhoon’ hacking group Chinese hackers accessed the networks of US broadband providers and obtained information from systems that the federal government uses for court-authorized wiretapping, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Saturday. The networks of Verizon Communications, AT&T and Lumen Technologies, along with other telecoms, were breached by the recently discovered intrusion, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter. The hackers might have held access for months to network infrastructure used by the companies to cooperate with court-authorized US requests for communications data, the report said. The hackers had also accessed other tranches of Internet traffic, it said. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
EYEING THE US ELECTION: Analysts say that Pyongyang would likely leverage its enlarged nuclear arsenal for concessions after a new US administration is inaugurated North Korean leader Kim Jong-un warned again that he could use nuclear weapons in potential conflicts with South Korea and the US, as he accused them of provoking North Korea and raising animosities on the Korean Peninsula, state media reported yesterday. Kim has issued threats to use nuclear weapons pre-emptively numerous times, but his latest warning came as experts said that North Korea could ramp up hostilities ahead of next month’s US presidential election. In a Monday speech at a university named after him, the Kim Jong-un National Defense University, he said that North Korea “will without hesitation use all its attack
RSS