Qiao Mu (喬木) had always insisted he would not be forced to leave China.
“We must change our nation, not our nationality,” the outspoken academic told the Guardian over lunch in the summer of 2015.
However, on Friday last week, the former Beijing Foreign Studies University journalism professor and his family set off for Beijing Capital Airport to catch a Boeing 777 bound for the US.
Photo: AFP
“I am leaving my country and I will miss it. Farewell,” Qiao, 47, announced on the social messaging service WeChat, as he waited to board Air China Flight CA817 to Washington.
He did not say when, or indeed if, he might return.
In the nearly five years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office, Qiao, a journalism professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University and a human rights advocate, had emerged as an increasingly isolated voice of dissent in a country where political opposition appears to grow more perilous by the day.
China-based foreign correspondents and diplomats complain that under Xi — who is about to complete his first term in power — local academics have increasingly shied away from discussing politically sensitive topics or, in some cases, meeting with foreigners at all.
“The general climate for reporting in China deteriorated over the last year,” a report released by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China in November last year said. “Many denounced pressure exerted on organizations and academia, and cited growing difficulties in securing interviews with sources and experts.”
However, Qiao appeared to shrug off the pressure, granting regular interviews to media outlets worldwide, including the Guardian, the Financial Times the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.
He tackled thorny issues such as media censorship, ethnic rioting, elite politics and the Mao-style personality cult that some accuse Xi of trying to cultivate.
“I am a typical Chinese person. I love my country and I want to change it,” Qiao told Agence France-Presse earlier this year.
Qiao declined to go into details about his decision to swap northern China for the east coast of the US.
“I am busy making a living,” he said in a brief WeChat message this week
However, friends said he had decided to leave after seeing his academic career wrecked by his refusal to fall into line.
Since 2014, Qiao had been banished from the classroom, apparently in punishment for his public support for ideas such as multi-party democracy and freedom of speech.
In April, Qiao resigned, citing his frustrations at the political restrictions as a motivating factor.
“A journalism professor [who] has to be against a free media. Even Tchaikovsky could not play a symphony with enough sorrow for my situation,” he complained in a letter published online.
Former Beijing Normal University assistant professor of Classical Chinese Shi Jiepeng (史杰鵬), who also recently fell victim to the crackdown on liberal thinkers, said life had been made impossible for his friend.
“People like him cannot find any jobs within the system,” said Shi, who was sacked from his job at the university in July as a result of his politically charged online posts.
“There was still space outside the system, but without the backing of an institution a scholar faces all sorts of inconveniences,” Shi added.
He suggested financial difficulties had played a role in Qiao’s exit, since he would have lost the benefits that came with a university job, such as his daughter’s education.
“Going to [the US] is the least bad choice for him, but it is not the best choice and he has no alternative but to choose,” Shi said.
During his 2015 interview, Qiao said he was well aware of the risks involved in speaking out in Xi’s ever more illiberal China.
Just days before security forces had launched a notorious round-up of human rights lawyers and activists — later dubbed China’s “war on law” — spiriting some of the country’s best-known attorneys into secret detention.
“Before Xi Jinping, we feared only that they would delete our [online] posts. In the worst situation, they would delete [your account],” Qiao said. “But since Xi Jinping came to power this changed. They began to arrest people.”
Qiao avoided that fate, but with his departure last week he joined a growing list of liberal Chinese academics who abandon their homeland in search of sanctuary overseas.
“The situation in the last year has become not better, but worse for intellectual life in China ... It’s a sad time to be an intellectual,” China expert Jerome Cohen said, who has been helping refugee academics arriving in the US.
“It is not simple to get a permanent job abroad as good as the one you have had in China,” Cohen admitted. “But with the incentive of not being free to write and speak as they normally would, people scramble for whatever chance they can get.”
“People are trying to cope,” he added. “But they realize that they have at least five [more years of Xi Jinping] to deal with.”
News of Qiao’s unexpected retreat was celebrated by friends and supporters on Twitter, which Qiao will now be able to use without having to use a virtual private network to leap over China’s draconian Internet controls.
“Welcome to the free world,” wrote Zhou Fengsuo (周鋒鎖), a California-based exile who was forced from China after taking part in the 1989 Tiananmen protests.
“Breathe free air,” suggested another commenter.
Two years ago, Qiao said he dreamed of one day being elected to office in a democratic China and vowed to remain so he was ready to serve his country when that day came.
“I have studied the transition of eastern European countries — usually it is professors, writers, lawyers and journalists who become politicians,” he said. “I want to be a congressman — to criticize, to supervise the corrupt government.”
Did Qiao still harbour that dream, despite his decision to leave?
“It seems he still does,” Shi said.
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to