Qiao Mu (喬木) had always insisted he would not be forced to leave China.
“We must change our nation, not our nationality,” the outspoken academic told the Guardian over lunch in the summer of 2015.
However, on Friday last week, the former Beijing Foreign Studies University journalism professor and his family set off for Beijing Capital Airport to catch a Boeing 777 bound for the US.
Photo: AFP
“I am leaving my country and I will miss it. Farewell,” Qiao, 47, announced on the social messaging service WeChat, as he waited to board Air China Flight CA817 to Washington.
He did not say when, or indeed if, he might return.
In the nearly five years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office, Qiao, a journalism professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University and a human rights advocate, had emerged as an increasingly isolated voice of dissent in a country where political opposition appears to grow more perilous by the day.
China-based foreign correspondents and diplomats complain that under Xi — who is about to complete his first term in power — local academics have increasingly shied away from discussing politically sensitive topics or, in some cases, meeting with foreigners at all.
“The general climate for reporting in China deteriorated over the last year,” a report released by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China in November last year said. “Many denounced pressure exerted on organizations and academia, and cited growing difficulties in securing interviews with sources and experts.”
However, Qiao appeared to shrug off the pressure, granting regular interviews to media outlets worldwide, including the Guardian, the Financial Times the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.
He tackled thorny issues such as media censorship, ethnic rioting, elite politics and the Mao-style personality cult that some accuse Xi of trying to cultivate.
“I am a typical Chinese person. I love my country and I want to change it,” Qiao told Agence France-Presse earlier this year.
Qiao declined to go into details about his decision to swap northern China for the east coast of the US.
“I am busy making a living,” he said in a brief WeChat message this week
However, friends said he had decided to leave after seeing his academic career wrecked by his refusal to fall into line.
Since 2014, Qiao had been banished from the classroom, apparently in punishment for his public support for ideas such as multi-party democracy and freedom of speech.
In April, Qiao resigned, citing his frustrations at the political restrictions as a motivating factor.
“A journalism professor [who] has to be against a free media. Even Tchaikovsky could not play a symphony with enough sorrow for my situation,” he complained in a letter published online.
Former Beijing Normal University assistant professor of Classical Chinese Shi Jiepeng (史杰鵬), who also recently fell victim to the crackdown on liberal thinkers, said life had been made impossible for his friend.
“People like him cannot find any jobs within the system,” said Shi, who was sacked from his job at the university in July as a result of his politically charged online posts.
“There was still space outside the system, but without the backing of an institution a scholar faces all sorts of inconveniences,” Shi added.
He suggested financial difficulties had played a role in Qiao’s exit, since he would have lost the benefits that came with a university job, such as his daughter’s education.
“Going to [the US] is the least bad choice for him, but it is not the best choice and he has no alternative but to choose,” Shi said.
During his 2015 interview, Qiao said he was well aware of the risks involved in speaking out in Xi’s ever more illiberal China.
Just days before security forces had launched a notorious round-up of human rights lawyers and activists — later dubbed China’s “war on law” — spiriting some of the country’s best-known attorneys into secret detention.
“Before Xi Jinping, we feared only that they would delete our [online] posts. In the worst situation, they would delete [your account],” Qiao said. “But since Xi Jinping came to power this changed. They began to arrest people.”
Qiao avoided that fate, but with his departure last week he joined a growing list of liberal Chinese academics who abandon their homeland in search of sanctuary overseas.
“The situation in the last year has become not better, but worse for intellectual life in China ... It’s a sad time to be an intellectual,” China expert Jerome Cohen said, who has been helping refugee academics arriving in the US.
“It is not simple to get a permanent job abroad as good as the one you have had in China,” Cohen admitted. “But with the incentive of not being free to write and speak as they normally would, people scramble for whatever chance they can get.”
“People are trying to cope,” he added. “But they realize that they have at least five [more years of Xi Jinping] to deal with.”
News of Qiao’s unexpected retreat was celebrated by friends and supporters on Twitter, which Qiao will now be able to use without having to use a virtual private network to leap over China’s draconian Internet controls.
“Welcome to the free world,” wrote Zhou Fengsuo (周鋒鎖), a California-based exile who was forced from China after taking part in the 1989 Tiananmen protests.
“Breathe free air,” suggested another commenter.
Two years ago, Qiao said he dreamed of one day being elected to office in a democratic China and vowed to remain so he was ready to serve his country when that day came.
“I have studied the transition of eastern European countries — usually it is professors, writers, lawyers and journalists who become politicians,” he said. “I want to be a congressman — to criticize, to supervise the corrupt government.”
Did Qiao still harbour that dream, despite his decision to leave?
“It seems he still does,” Shi said.
CONDITIONS: The Russian president said a deal that was scuppered by ‘elites’ in the US and Europe should be revived, as Ukraine was generally satisfied with it Russian President Vladimir Putin yesterday said that he was ready for talks with Ukraine, after having previously rebuffed the idea of negotiations while Kyiv’s offensive into the Kursk region was ongoing. Ukraine last month launched a cross-border incursion into Russia’s Kursk region, sending thousands of troops across the border and seizing several villages. Putin said shortly after there could be no talk of negotiations. Speaking at a question and answer session at Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, Putin said that Russia was ready for talks, but on the basis of an aborted deal between Moscow’s and Kyiv’s negotiators reached in Istanbul, Turkey,
In months, Lo Yuet-ping would bid farewell to a centuries-old village he has called home in Hong Kong for more than seven decades. The Cha Kwo Ling village in east Kowloon is filled with small houses built from metal sheets and stones, as well as old granite buildings, contrasting sharply with the high-rise structures that dominate much of the Asian financial hub. Lo, 72, has spent his entire life here and is among an estimated 860 households required to move under a government redevelopment plan. He said he would miss the rich history, unique culture and warm interpersonal kindness that defined life in
AERIAL INCURSIONS: The incidents are a reminder that Russia’s aggressive actions go beyond Ukraine’s borders, Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said Two NATO members on Sunday said that Russian drones violated their airspace, as one reportedly flew into Romania during nighttime attacks on neighboring Ukraine, while another crashed in eastern Latvia the previous day. A drone entered Romanian territory early on Sunday as Moscow struck “civilian targets and port infrastructure” across the Danube in Ukraine, the Romanian Ministry of National Defense said. It added that Bucharest had deployed F-16 warplanes to monitor its airspace and issued text alerts to residents of two eastern regions. It also said investigations were underway of a potential “impact zone” in an uninhabited area along the Romanian-Ukrainian border. There
A French woman whose husband has admitted to enlisting dozens of strangers to rape her while she was drugged on Thursday told his trial that police had saved her life by uncovering the crimes. “The police saved my life by investigating Mister Pelicot’s computer,” Gisele Pelicot told the court in the southern city of Avignon, referring to her husband — one of 51 of her alleged abusers on trial — by only his surname. Speaking for the first time since the extraordinary trial began on Monday, Gisele Pelicot, now 71, revealed her emotion in almost 90 minutes of testimony, recounting her mysterious