Mon, Jul 06, 2009 page4

• Fighting the ‘neo-liberal’ label

  FUZZY ELECTIONS: Sloganeering has dominated Indonesia’s presidential campaign, as opposition candidates tout ‘self-reliance’ and nationalism without detailing their plans

  • AFP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono can be forgiven for feeling smug ahead of Wednesday’s presidential polls — he is overseeing one of the best performing economies in the G20 amid a global crisis.

  The liberal ex-general has a huge lead over his main rival, former president Megawati Sukarnoputri, and is hoping to avoid a September runoff by winning a clear majority in the first round of elections.

  Indonesia’s economy is growing at more than 4 percent and is expected to rebound to around 6 percent next year on the back of strong domestic demand and revived export sales.

  

  Indonesian residents walk past an official election commission banner showing the three presidential candidates with their running mates along a street in Tanggerang, Banten Province, yesterday.

  PHOTO: AFP

  Such numbers should make Indonesians of all political stripes pleased as Punch, especially after the mauling the economy received during the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, when the country virtually went bankrupt.

  But not so. Almost by virtue of his administration’s economic success, the soft-spoken president known simply as SBY has come under attack as a “neo-liberal,” a free-market zealot and stooge of foreign capitalists.

  His opponents have offered an alternative economic vision based on national “self reliance” and raged against the allegedly uneven exploitation of the country’s vast natural resources by foreign mining and forestry companies.

  All well and good, except that no one seems to know exactly what any of the candidates are talking about when it comes to economic policy in Southeast Asia’s biggest economy.

  Center for Strategic and International Studies economist Pande Raja Silalahi said attempts to paint Yudhoyono as a “neo-liberal” were no more than negative campaign tactics and populist sloganeering.

  “There’s no such thing as ‘neo-liberal’ in this country. Those who rant about it don’t understand what ‘neo-liberal’ means,” he said.

  Megawati’s running mate, former special forces commander Prabowo Subianto, has attacked Yudhoyono as a “neo-liberal” and jumped on the “self-reliance” bandwagon.

  The third candidate in the race, Vice President Jusuf Kalla, has taken the same line, saying that if Indonesia wants to be a “big country” it has to shun outside influence and go it alone.

  What that means in practice, though, is hard to fathom.

  “Ideally, self reliance is possible for Indonesia but in practice it can’t work,” Silalahi said.

  “There are no countries in the world that practice the economy of Robinson Crusoe. Self-reliance is a silly idea. International trade is done on the basis that nations can create better welfare for their people,” he said.

  Prabowo and Kalla have not given a detailed set of proposals on how they plan to make Indonesia a self-reliant agrarian paradise.

  “Don’t accept the idea that we are destined to be a poor nation forever,” Prabowo said in a recent campaign speech. “Don’t accept the verdict of the neo-liberal agents who are not honest, who are afraid to admit to themselves that they are neo-liberal.”

  “As the election approaches they pretend to be nationalists but the nation’s assets are being sold one by one,” he said.

  Kalla described it in even starker terms.

  “Don’t let the blond-haired businessmen rule Indonesia ... we can become the masters of our own country,” he said during a televised election debate.

  Yudhoyono has hardly done a better job of explaining his economic strategy, but vehemently rejects the “neo-liberal” label.

  “I choose an economy of the middle-ground and will not leave everything to the market, or what you call fundamentalist capitalism or neo-liberalism,” the president said in his first campaign speech last month.

  When Yudhoyono ousted Megawati in a landslide in 2004, foreign direct investment excluding oil, gas and banking was valued at US$4.57 billion. It had increased to US$10.34 billion by 2007 and US$14.87 billion last year.

  Most economists believe more foreign direct investment (FDI) is needed, especially in infrastructure and energy projects.

  “The rising value of FDI doesn’t mean the government is neo-liberal. Capital and labor in the globalization era are mobile and cross-border,” Standard Chartered Bank economist Fauzi Ichsan said. “Even during Megawati’s term, foreign direct investment increased,” he said. “FDI is good because it creates more job opportunities and decreases the number of poor people.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    Police identify man who engaged in indecency at park

  • 3

    TSMC expects global chip revenue to hit US$1.5tn

  • 4

    Trump weighs Taiwan arms package

  • 5

    No surprises at Xi-Trump talks: MAC