The year 2027 is regarded as the year China would likely gain the capability to invade Taiwan, not the year it would launch an invasion, Taiwanese defense experts said yesterday.
The experts made the remarks after President William Lai (賴清德) told a news conference on Wednesday that his administration would introduce a NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) special defense budget bill to boost Taiwan’s overall defense posture over the next eight years.
Lai said that Beijing aims for military unification of Taiwan by 2027. The Presidential Office later clarified that what Lai meant was that China’s goal is to “prepare for military unification of Taiwan by 2027.”
Photo: Taipei Times
Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲), director of the Division of Defense Strategy and Resources at the military-funded Institute for National Defense and Security Research, on Thursday said that former top US Indo-Pacific commander Philip Davidson in 2021 predicted that China would attain the military capability to mount an invasion by 2027.
Although the timeframe — later coined the Davidson window — is frequently discussed in the context of Chinese military development, it does not mean that experts believe Beijing would launch an invasion that year, or that it would win if such an attack were attempted, Su said.
For China, obtaining the military capabilities to invade Taiwan enables the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to try waging war, but does not guarantee victory, he said.
Davidson’s discussions of the timeframe are speculations based on Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) publicly stated force modernization goals revolving around scheduled milestone events on the Chinese administrative-political calendar, Su said.
The years 2027, 2035 and 2049 are the years that Xi is anticipated to seek a fourth term as China’s supreme leader, the centennial benchmark of the PLA’s force modernization plan and the People’s Republic of China’s 100th founding anniversary respectively, Su said.
For that reason, Beijing is expected to set 2027 as the year the PLA must acquire the capabilities to conduct an offensive campaign against Taiwan, he said.
Taiwan’s regular military spending accounts for 3.23 percent of GDP, which is low, he said.
Lai’s pledge on Wednesday to invest in national defense is a remedial measure aimed at addressing urgent needs, not a permanent answer to the underlying problem, he said.
While the president’s defense pledge could potentially boost total military spending to 5 percent of GDP by 2030, the appropriate solution should be to achieve the expenditure via the regular defense budget, Su said.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, US-China trade disputes, China’s economic decline and Xi’s military purge have introduced uncertainties about Beijing’s ability to meet the PLA’s force modernization timetable, said Shen Ming-shih (沈明室), another researcher at the institute.
It is unknown whether Xi would remain in power past 2027 and the likelihood of the Chinese leader resorting to invading Taiwan for internal political ends has significantly declined, Shen said.
Additionally, Xi’s repeated public calls on the PLA to be prepared to invade Taiwan suggest that the Chinese military has not achieved its modernization goals, he said.
The Davidson window remains prominent in expert discourse because the concrete dates it furnishes are useful for informing strategic planning, including Taiwan’s timetable for acquiring F-16 jets and M1 tanks, he said.
The public should refrain from incorrectly interpreting Lai’s comments surrounding his pledge to boost defense spending as a prediction that China would attack in 2027, Shen said.
The strategic environment, China’s internal political struggles leading up to the 21st National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party and the PLA’s level of preparedness would likely play major roles in determining whether China would invade, he said.
However, Taiwan’s military capabilities and preparedness — which dictate its deterrence capabilities — remain the most important factors, Shen said.
As there is no possible method to accurately predict if and when war would break out, the best and only measure for the nation is to be prepared to repel a Chinese invasion in 2027, he said.
A small number of Taiwanese this year lost their citizenship rights after traveling in China and obtaining a one-time Chinese passport to cross the border into Russia, a source said today. The people signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of neighboring Russia with companies claiming they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, the source said on condition of anonymity. The travelers were actually issued one-time-use Chinese passports, they said. Taiwanese are prohibited from holding a Chinese passport or household registration. If found to have a Chinese ID, they may lose their resident status under Article 9-1
Taiwanese were praised for their composure after a video filmed by Taiwanese tourists capturing the moment a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Aomori Prefecture went viral on social media. The video shows a hotel room shaking violently amid Monday’s quake, with objects falling to the ground. Two Taiwanese began filming with their mobile phones, while two others held the sides of a TV to prevent it from falling. When the shaking stopped, the pair calmly took down the TV and laid it flat on a tatami mat, the video shows. The video also captured the group talking about the safety of their companions bathing
PROBLEMATIC APP: Citing more than 1,000 fraud cases, the government is taking the app down for a year, but opposition voices are calling it censorship Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) yesterday decried a government plan to suspend access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書) for one year as censorship, while the Presidential Office backed the plan. The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday cited security risks and accusations that the Instagram-like app, known as Rednote in English, had figured in more than 1,700 fraud cases since last year. The company, which has about 3 million users in Taiwan, has not yet responded to requests for comment. “Many people online are already asking ‘How to climb over the firewall to access Xiaohongshu,’” Cheng posted on
A classified Pentagon-produced, multiyear assessment — the Overmatch brief — highlighted unreported Chinese capabilities to destroy US military assets and identified US supply chain choke points, painting a disturbing picture of waning US military might, a New York Times editorial published on Monday said. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s comments in November last year that “we lose every time” in Pentagon-conducted war games pitting the US against China further highlighted the uncertainty about the US’ capability to intervene in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. “It shows the Pentagon’s overreliance on expensive, vulnerable weapons as adversaries field cheap, technologically